论医学与国家的边界:《为了萨玛》与《同呼吸》中具身性与时间性的创伤状态

Aleksander Sedzielarz
{"title":"论医学与国家的边界:《为了萨玛》与《同呼吸》中具身性与时间性的创伤状态","authors":"Aleksander Sedzielarz","doi":"10.54103/2036-461x/17912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Set in the zone of egregious war crimes against the civilian population of Aleppo and in the biohazard zones of the encroaching COVID-19 epidemic, Waad Al-Kateab’s For Sama and Wang Nanfu’s In the Same Breath invent documentary approaches that create complex temporalities — modes of cinematic address that engage trauma as a field of experience that has been absorbed within institutional discourses of state power built through crises. Filmed in zones of crises in which hospitals exist in states of exception that generate and guarantee state sovereignty, the traumatic scene of crisis becomes both excess and fragment that documentary form contains and interprets. This analysis draws on Ruth Leys’ ‘genealogy’ of trauma and Lisa Guenther’s notion of the ‘necrobiopolitical rituals’ of state bureaucracy to show that both documentaries illuminate a fundamental split between discourses of medical knowledge and state power within which cinema asserts fluid and shifting temporalities as a mode of engaging events of crisis as history.","PeriodicalId":262328,"journal":{"name":"Cinéma & Cie. Film and Media Studies Journal","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Frontier Between Medicine and State: Traumatic States of Embodiment and Temporality in Waad Al-Kateab’s For Sama and Wang Nanfu’s In the Same Breath\",\"authors\":\"Aleksander Sedzielarz\",\"doi\":\"10.54103/2036-461x/17912\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Set in the zone of egregious war crimes against the civilian population of Aleppo and in the biohazard zones of the encroaching COVID-19 epidemic, Waad Al-Kateab’s For Sama and Wang Nanfu’s In the Same Breath invent documentary approaches that create complex temporalities — modes of cinematic address that engage trauma as a field of experience that has been absorbed within institutional discourses of state power built through crises. Filmed in zones of crises in which hospitals exist in states of exception that generate and guarantee state sovereignty, the traumatic scene of crisis becomes both excess and fragment that documentary form contains and interprets. This analysis draws on Ruth Leys’ ‘genealogy’ of trauma and Lisa Guenther’s notion of the ‘necrobiopolitical rituals’ of state bureaucracy to show that both documentaries illuminate a fundamental split between discourses of medical knowledge and state power within which cinema asserts fluid and shifting temporalities as a mode of engaging events of crisis as history.\",\"PeriodicalId\":262328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cinéma & Cie. Film and Media Studies Journal\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cinéma & Cie. Film and Media Studies Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54103/2036-461x/17912\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cinéma & Cie. Film and Media Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54103/2036-461x/17912","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Waad Al-Kateab的《为了萨玛》(For Sama)和王南甫的《同呼吸》(in the Same Breath)以阿勒颇平民遭受严重战争罪行的地区和正在蔓延的COVID-19流行病的生物危害地区为背景,发明了创造复杂时间的纪录片方法——将创伤作为一种经验领域的电影处理模式,被通过危机建立起来的国家权力的制度性话语所吸收。在危机地区拍摄,医院存在于产生和保障国家主权的例外状态中,危机的创伤场景成为纪录片形式包含和解释的多余和片段。这一分析借鉴了Ruth Leys的创伤“谱系”和Lisa Guenther的国家官僚机构的“死亡生物政治仪式”的概念,以表明两部纪录片都阐明了医学知识和国家权力话语之间的根本分裂,在这种分裂中,电影将流动和变化的时间性作为一种参与危机事件作为历史的模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On the Frontier Between Medicine and State: Traumatic States of Embodiment and Temporality in Waad Al-Kateab’s For Sama and Wang Nanfu’s In the Same Breath
Set in the zone of egregious war crimes against the civilian population of Aleppo and in the biohazard zones of the encroaching COVID-19 epidemic, Waad Al-Kateab’s For Sama and Wang Nanfu’s In the Same Breath invent documentary approaches that create complex temporalities — modes of cinematic address that engage trauma as a field of experience that has been absorbed within institutional discourses of state power built through crises. Filmed in zones of crises in which hospitals exist in states of exception that generate and guarantee state sovereignty, the traumatic scene of crisis becomes both excess and fragment that documentary form contains and interprets. This analysis draws on Ruth Leys’ ‘genealogy’ of trauma and Lisa Guenther’s notion of the ‘necrobiopolitical rituals’ of state bureaucracy to show that both documentaries illuminate a fundamental split between discourses of medical knowledge and state power within which cinema asserts fluid and shifting temporalities as a mode of engaging events of crisis as history.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Symptomatic Images/Contagious Images: The Ambivalence of Visual Narratives of Eating Disorders ‘Hands at Work’: Patching Women’s Film Histories through Sabrina Gschwandtner’s Film Quilts Ph.D. Thesis Abstract - Long Live Sport. Toward an Interdisciplinary Approach to Liveness and Televised Sporting Event Sacha Polak's Dirty God and the Politics of Authenticity Audiovisual Means to Therapeutic Ends. The Cinematic Dispositive within Medical Humanities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1