{"title":"通过关注视觉与嗅觉感知之间的差距,走向价值驱动的体验设计","authors":"Sukyoung Kim","doi":"10.35199/epde.2022.90","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intuition and insight are two processes that link the tacit and the explicit knowledge, which are relevant to idea sharing in the design process for evolving critical values into an innovative design. Experiences to link the tacit and the explicit knowledge easily enhance and foster more valuable and creative thinking. The present research aimed to verify unanswered questions focused on multisensory stimulation and integration as follows. Q1: Visual or olfactory stimuli influence the same way regardless of whether it is unimodal or multimodal ? Q2: Is liking the only intuitive value compared to other semantical values such as freshness, weightiness and experience ? The current research presented significant findings which answer the above-mentioned questions. A1: Visual knowledge is more solid and influenceable than olfactory knowledge in unimodal conditions, whereas olfactory knowledge is more solid and influenceable than visual knowledge in multimodal conditions. A2: Liking is a more clear and effectible value to verify the impression of the perceived stimuli. And the worthiest finding from the results is that liking is relevant to experience. The evaluation results of liking show similar trends as experience, and vice versa. Further research should clarify in further research whether liking correlates with sensitivity or not in the structured sensory and leads the subjective evaluations to modify specific evaluation values. The findings of this research are worthy as they provide a hint to enhance value-driven design factors to foster more valuable and creative experiences which will be beyond our expectations.","PeriodicalId":147286,"journal":{"name":"DS 117: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE 2022), London South Bank University in London, UK. 8th - 9th September 2022","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TOWARDS VALUE-DRIVEN EXPERIENCE DESIGN BY MINDING THE GAP BETWEEN VISUAL-OLFACTORY PERCEPTION\",\"authors\":\"Sukyoung Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.35199/epde.2022.90\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Intuition and insight are two processes that link the tacit and the explicit knowledge, which are relevant to idea sharing in the design process for evolving critical values into an innovative design. Experiences to link the tacit and the explicit knowledge easily enhance and foster more valuable and creative thinking. The present research aimed to verify unanswered questions focused on multisensory stimulation and integration as follows. Q1: Visual or olfactory stimuli influence the same way regardless of whether it is unimodal or multimodal ? Q2: Is liking the only intuitive value compared to other semantical values such as freshness, weightiness and experience ? The current research presented significant findings which answer the above-mentioned questions. A1: Visual knowledge is more solid and influenceable than olfactory knowledge in unimodal conditions, whereas olfactory knowledge is more solid and influenceable than visual knowledge in multimodal conditions. A2: Liking is a more clear and effectible value to verify the impression of the perceived stimuli. And the worthiest finding from the results is that liking is relevant to experience. The evaluation results of liking show similar trends as experience, and vice versa. Further research should clarify in further research whether liking correlates with sensitivity or not in the structured sensory and leads the subjective evaluations to modify specific evaluation values. The findings of this research are worthy as they provide a hint to enhance value-driven design factors to foster more valuable and creative experiences which will be beyond our expectations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":147286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DS 117: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE 2022), London South Bank University in London, UK. 8th - 9th September 2022\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DS 117: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE 2022), London South Bank University in London, UK. 8th - 9th September 2022\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35199/epde.2022.90\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DS 117: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE 2022), London South Bank University in London, UK. 8th - 9th September 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35199/epde.2022.90","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

直觉和洞察力是连接隐性知识和显性知识的两个过程,它们与设计过程中的思想共享有关,从而将关键价值演变为创新设计。将隐性知识和显性知识联系起来的经验,容易增强和培养更有价值和创造性的思维。本研究旨在验证以下多感觉刺激和整合的未解之谜。无论是单峰还是多峰,视觉或嗅觉刺激的影响方式都是一样的?Q2:与新鲜度、分量和体验等其他语义价值相比,喜欢是唯一的直观价值吗?目前的研究提出了重要的发现,回答了上述问题。A1:在单模态条件下,视觉知识比嗅觉知识更坚实、更有影响力,而在多模态条件下,嗅觉知识比视觉知识更坚实、更有影响力。A2:喜欢是验证感知刺激印象的更清晰有效的价值。结果中最有价值的发现是,喜欢与经历有关。“喜欢”的评价结果与“经验”的评价结果具有相似的趋势,反之亦然。进一步的研究应进一步阐明喜欢是否与结构化感官的敏感性相关,并导致主观评价对具体评价值的修改。这项研究的发现是有价值的,因为它提供了一个提示,以增强价值驱动的设计因素,以培养更多的有价值的和创造性的体验,将超出我们的期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
TOWARDS VALUE-DRIVEN EXPERIENCE DESIGN BY MINDING THE GAP BETWEEN VISUAL-OLFACTORY PERCEPTION
Intuition and insight are two processes that link the tacit and the explicit knowledge, which are relevant to idea sharing in the design process for evolving critical values into an innovative design. Experiences to link the tacit and the explicit knowledge easily enhance and foster more valuable and creative thinking. The present research aimed to verify unanswered questions focused on multisensory stimulation and integration as follows. Q1: Visual or olfactory stimuli influence the same way regardless of whether it is unimodal or multimodal ? Q2: Is liking the only intuitive value compared to other semantical values such as freshness, weightiness and experience ? The current research presented significant findings which answer the above-mentioned questions. A1: Visual knowledge is more solid and influenceable than olfactory knowledge in unimodal conditions, whereas olfactory knowledge is more solid and influenceable than visual knowledge in multimodal conditions. A2: Liking is a more clear and effectible value to verify the impression of the perceived stimuli. And the worthiest finding from the results is that liking is relevant to experience. The evaluation results of liking show similar trends as experience, and vice versa. Further research should clarify in further research whether liking correlates with sensitivity or not in the structured sensory and leads the subjective evaluations to modify specific evaluation values. The findings of this research are worthy as they provide a hint to enhance value-driven design factors to foster more valuable and creative experiences which will be beyond our expectations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
HOW GRAPHIC DESIGN CAN INFLUENCE THE PERCEPTION OF SUSTAINABLE FOOD PACKAGING EXPERIENCES WITH EMOTIONAL DESIGN ECOLOGICAL ETHICS: TOWARDS AN EDUCATION OF TECHNO-DIVERSITY ANTICIPATIVE CO-CREATION METHOD EVALUATION OF WORKBOOKS AS AN ACTIVE LEARNING TOOL FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN ENGINEERING
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1