分层(辅助)生殖的繁殖

L. Harris
{"title":"分层(辅助)生殖的繁殖","authors":"L. Harris","doi":"10.1093/med/9780190873028.003.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter considers epidemiological, historical, and ideological forces that constructed infertility as a “white” ailment and in vitro fertilization (IVF) as a treatment for the infertility of white professional women in their late 30s, 40s, and beyond. The author begins with a case from her own practice and then returns to IVF’s origins in the United States in the 1980s to show how in its practice and its technical details it reproduces race and class inequalities. Ultimately, the author argues that IVF grew out of an ideology of stratified reproduction, in which the fertility, reproduction, and motherhood of white, professional women was valued and that of poor women and women of color was not. While usual bioethical analyses of infertility treatment focus on the questions raised in sensational cases, here the author considers the race and class coding of infertility as a moral issue because, as she concludes, it is a question of whose lives matter.","PeriodicalId":269787,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Ethics in Clinical Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Reproduction of Stratified (Assisted) Reproduction\",\"authors\":\"L. Harris\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/med/9780190873028.003.0008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter considers epidemiological, historical, and ideological forces that constructed infertility as a “white” ailment and in vitro fertilization (IVF) as a treatment for the infertility of white professional women in their late 30s, 40s, and beyond. The author begins with a case from her own practice and then returns to IVF’s origins in the United States in the 1980s to show how in its practice and its technical details it reproduces race and class inequalities. Ultimately, the author argues that IVF grew out of an ideology of stratified reproduction, in which the fertility, reproduction, and motherhood of white, professional women was valued and that of poor women and women of color was not. While usual bioethical analyses of infertility treatment focus on the questions raised in sensational cases, here the author considers the race and class coding of infertility as a moral issue because, as she concludes, it is a question of whose lives matter.\",\"PeriodicalId\":269787,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reproductive Ethics in Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reproductive Ethics in Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780190873028.003.0008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Ethics in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780190873028.003.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章考虑流行病学、历史和意识形态的力量,这些力量将不孕症构建为一种“白人”疾病,并将体外受精(IVF)作为一种治疗30多岁、40多岁及以上的白人职业女性不孕症的方法。作者从她自己的一个案例开始,然后回到20世纪80年代美国试管婴儿的起源,以展示其实践和技术细节如何再现种族和阶级不平等。最后,作者认为体外受精产生于一种分层生殖的意识形态,在这种意识形态中,白人职业女性的生育能力、生育能力和母性受到重视,而贫穷女性和有色人种女性则不受重视。虽然通常对不孕症治疗的生物伦理分析集中在耸人听闻的病例中提出的问题上,但在这里,作者认为不孕症的种族和阶级编码是一个道德问题,因为正如她总结的那样,这是一个谁的生命重要的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Reproduction of Stratified (Assisted) Reproduction
This chapter considers epidemiological, historical, and ideological forces that constructed infertility as a “white” ailment and in vitro fertilization (IVF) as a treatment for the infertility of white professional women in their late 30s, 40s, and beyond. The author begins with a case from her own practice and then returns to IVF’s origins in the United States in the 1980s to show how in its practice and its technical details it reproduces race and class inequalities. Ultimately, the author argues that IVF grew out of an ideology of stratified reproduction, in which the fertility, reproduction, and motherhood of white, professional women was valued and that of poor women and women of color was not. While usual bioethical analyses of infertility treatment focus on the questions raised in sensational cases, here the author considers the race and class coding of infertility as a moral issue because, as she concludes, it is a question of whose lives matter.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Accessing Reproductive Technology in France Why Reproductive Justice Matters to Reproductive Ethics Doing Harm Contemporary Challenges to Providing Confidential Reproductive Healthcare to Minors Oncofertility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1