使用AHP模型的能源交易市场模型的专家建议

M. Montakhabi, J. Vannieuwenhuyze, P. Ballon
{"title":"使用AHP模型的能源交易市场模型的专家建议","authors":"M. Montakhabi, J. Vannieuwenhuyze, P. Ballon","doi":"10.1109/energycon53164.2022.9830404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we investigate how experts evaluate peer-to-peer (P2P), community self-consumption (CSC), and transactive energy (TE) market models compared to a traditional market model. The different models are evaluated on their capacities to generate different types of values in the electricity market. To facilitate the evaluations, we adopted the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The AHP is a quantitative multiple criteria decision-making tool facilitating experts to make a difficult choice between various options along a set of distinct evaluation criteria by a sequence of pairwise comparisons. So far, the AHP has not yet been applied in the context of energy transaction markets. Results show that experts prefer the community self-consumption and transactive energy market models because they might be most successful in generating green energy. These results help policy makers to better understand the heterogeneous capacities of the market models.","PeriodicalId":106388,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE 7th International Energy Conference (ENERGYCON)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expert Recommendations on Energy Trading Market Models using the AHP model\",\"authors\":\"M. Montakhabi, J. Vannieuwenhuyze, P. Ballon\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/energycon53164.2022.9830404\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we investigate how experts evaluate peer-to-peer (P2P), community self-consumption (CSC), and transactive energy (TE) market models compared to a traditional market model. The different models are evaluated on their capacities to generate different types of values in the electricity market. To facilitate the evaluations, we adopted the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The AHP is a quantitative multiple criteria decision-making tool facilitating experts to make a difficult choice between various options along a set of distinct evaluation criteria by a sequence of pairwise comparisons. So far, the AHP has not yet been applied in the context of energy transaction markets. Results show that experts prefer the community self-consumption and transactive energy market models because they might be most successful in generating green energy. These results help policy makers to better understand the heterogeneous capacities of the market models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":106388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE 7th International Energy Conference (ENERGYCON)\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE 7th International Energy Conference (ENERGYCON)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/energycon53164.2022.9830404\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE 7th International Energy Conference (ENERGYCON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/energycon53164.2022.9830404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们研究了专家如何评估点对点(P2P)、社区自消费(CSC)和交易能源(TE)市场模型与传统市场模型的比较。评估了不同的模型在电力市场上产生不同类型价值的能力。为了便于评价,我们采用了层次分析法(AHP)。AHP是一种定量的多标准决策工具,通过一系列的两两比较,帮助专家在一系列不同的评估标准中做出困难的选择。到目前为止,AHP还没有在能源交易市场中得到应用。结果表明,专家们更倾向于社区自用和交易能源市场模式,因为它们可能在产生绿色能源方面最成功。这些结果有助于决策者更好地理解市场模型的异质性能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Expert Recommendations on Energy Trading Market Models using the AHP model
In this paper, we investigate how experts evaluate peer-to-peer (P2P), community self-consumption (CSC), and transactive energy (TE) market models compared to a traditional market model. The different models are evaluated on their capacities to generate different types of values in the electricity market. To facilitate the evaluations, we adopted the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The AHP is a quantitative multiple criteria decision-making tool facilitating experts to make a difficult choice between various options along a set of distinct evaluation criteria by a sequence of pairwise comparisons. So far, the AHP has not yet been applied in the context of energy transaction markets. Results show that experts prefer the community self-consumption and transactive energy market models because they might be most successful in generating green energy. These results help policy makers to better understand the heterogeneous capacities of the market models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Monitoring System for PV plants using Open Technologies Fast charging for electric vehicles station integration with renewable energy sources Multi-objective Combined Heuristic-SPSO for Power Loss and Congestion Mitigation in Distribution Networks Long-term Energy and Fuel Consumption Forecast in Private and Commercial Transport using Artificial Life Approach Enhanced Control of the Interchange Power Flows in the Interconnected Energy System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1