乳腺癌初级治疗的延迟因素。

Acta chirurgica Scandinavica Pub Date : 1990-09-01
J Tennvall, T Möller, R Attewell
{"title":"乳腺癌初级治疗的延迟因素。","authors":"J Tennvall,&nbsp;T Möller,&nbsp;R Attewell","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An effort has been made to study possible delaying factors in the diagnosis and primary treatment of breast cancer. The data are based on 273 female patients, referred to the Department of Oncology, Lund, constituting 50% of all primary breast carcinomas without a previous malignancy diagnosed in 1986 in a catchment area of 1.2 million. Of these, 68% initially consulted a general or private practitioner, whereas only 21% directly consulted surgical departments. The interval from the initial consultation to operation, analysed multivariately, was correlated to the number of referral-steps (13 vs. 75 days), the category of physician initially consulted (15 vs. 33 days), and the outcome of a combined positive or negative mammography + aspiration cytology (13 vs. 58 days). If one or both of these diagnostic procedures were negative, the delay varied considerably between the four categories of physicians initially consulted. The median time between decision and start of radiotherapy was 38 days, constituting 46% of the time from the initial consultation to start of this treatment modality.</p>","PeriodicalId":7005,"journal":{"name":"Acta chirurgica Scandinavica","volume":"156 9","pages":"591-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Delaying factors in primary treatment of breast cancer.\",\"authors\":\"J Tennvall,&nbsp;T Möller,&nbsp;R Attewell\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>An effort has been made to study possible delaying factors in the diagnosis and primary treatment of breast cancer. The data are based on 273 female patients, referred to the Department of Oncology, Lund, constituting 50% of all primary breast carcinomas without a previous malignancy diagnosed in 1986 in a catchment area of 1.2 million. Of these, 68% initially consulted a general or private practitioner, whereas only 21% directly consulted surgical departments. The interval from the initial consultation to operation, analysed multivariately, was correlated to the number of referral-steps (13 vs. 75 days), the category of physician initially consulted (15 vs. 33 days), and the outcome of a combined positive or negative mammography + aspiration cytology (13 vs. 58 days). If one or both of these diagnostic procedures were negative, the delay varied considerably between the four categories of physicians initially consulted. The median time between decision and start of radiotherapy was 38 days, constituting 46% of the time from the initial consultation to start of this treatment modality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta chirurgica Scandinavica\",\"volume\":\"156 9\",\"pages\":\"591-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta chirurgica Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta chirurgica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

已经在努力研究乳腺癌的诊断和初步治疗中可能的延迟因素。这些数据来自隆德肿瘤科的273名女性患者,占1986年在120万集水区诊断出的所有无恶性肿瘤的原发性乳腺癌的50%。其中68%的人最初咨询了全科医生或私人医生,而只有21%的人直接咨询了外科医生。从初次会诊到手术的时间间隔,经多变量分析,与转诊步骤数(13天vs. 75天)、初次会诊医师类别(15天vs. 33天)以及乳房x光检查+吸痰细胞学检查阳性或阴性结果(13天vs. 58天)相关。如果这些诊断程序中的一个或两个都是阴性的,那么最初咨询的四类医生之间的延迟差异很大。从决定到开始放射治疗的中位时间为38天,占从最初咨询到开始这种治疗方式时间的46%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Delaying factors in primary treatment of breast cancer.

An effort has been made to study possible delaying factors in the diagnosis and primary treatment of breast cancer. The data are based on 273 female patients, referred to the Department of Oncology, Lund, constituting 50% of all primary breast carcinomas without a previous malignancy diagnosed in 1986 in a catchment area of 1.2 million. Of these, 68% initially consulted a general or private practitioner, whereas only 21% directly consulted surgical departments. The interval from the initial consultation to operation, analysed multivariately, was correlated to the number of referral-steps (13 vs. 75 days), the category of physician initially consulted (15 vs. 33 days), and the outcome of a combined positive or negative mammography + aspiration cytology (13 vs. 58 days). If one or both of these diagnostic procedures were negative, the delay varied considerably between the four categories of physicians initially consulted. The median time between decision and start of radiotherapy was 38 days, constituting 46% of the time from the initial consultation to start of this treatment modality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis. Atrial septal defects. Prevention of adhesions by high molecular weight dextran in rats. Re-evaluation in nine experiments. Relevant factors in the prognosis of ductal pancreatic carcinoma. A comparison of polypropylene mesh, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch and polyglycolic acid mesh for the repair of experimental abdominal wall defects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1