{"title":"DECT和WLAN信号用于室内定位的比较研究","authors":"M. Kranz, Carl Fischer, A. Schmidt","doi":"10.1109/PERCOM.2010.5466970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While there is more to context than location, localization and positioning must continue to be improved. Location-aware applications, such as Google Latitude, are enjoying great popularity. Location-based applications and services are widely used on platforms such as the iPhone. The localization itself thus remains an issue, especially in indoor scenarios.","PeriodicalId":207774,"journal":{"name":"2010 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"43","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study of DECT and WLAN signals for indoor localization\",\"authors\":\"M. Kranz, Carl Fischer, A. Schmidt\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PERCOM.2010.5466970\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While there is more to context than location, localization and positioning must continue to be improved. Location-aware applications, such as Google Latitude, are enjoying great popularity. Location-based applications and services are widely used on platforms such as the iPhone. The localization itself thus remains an issue, especially in indoor scenarios.\",\"PeriodicalId\":207774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom)\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"43\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PERCOM.2010.5466970\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PERCOM.2010.5466970","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A comparative study of DECT and WLAN signals for indoor localization
While there is more to context than location, localization and positioning must continue to be improved. Location-aware applications, such as Google Latitude, are enjoying great popularity. Location-based applications and services are widely used on platforms such as the iPhone. The localization itself thus remains an issue, especially in indoor scenarios.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
