自由是如何被先进技术破坏的,我们该怎么做

Gerlinde Weger
{"title":"自由是如何被先进技术破坏的,我们该怎么做","authors":"Gerlinde Weger","doi":"10.1145/3335082.3335099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper will provide a three-part analysis to demonstrate that automated decision-making systems (ADMS), representing advanced technologies, can and do undermine our freedom. The analysis will assess their impact on our freedom with three perspectives of how freedom can be defined. Based on each perspective, the paper will address how the encroachment to our freedom can be mitigated, preserved or regained. The three-part analysis will focus on Charles Taylor’s concept of having autonomy to exercise control over one’s life; interference from the perspective of Philip Pettit’s concept of domination-antipower and Sharon Krause’s framing of the socially distributed character of human agency and how technological and human bias impacts freedom. This layered analysis captures the complex impact advanced technologies have on our freedom.","PeriodicalId":279162,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 31st European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Freedom is Undermined by Advanced Technology and What to Do About It\",\"authors\":\"Gerlinde Weger\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3335082.3335099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper will provide a three-part analysis to demonstrate that automated decision-making systems (ADMS), representing advanced technologies, can and do undermine our freedom. The analysis will assess their impact on our freedom with three perspectives of how freedom can be defined. Based on each perspective, the paper will address how the encroachment to our freedom can be mitigated, preserved or regained. The three-part analysis will focus on Charles Taylor’s concept of having autonomy to exercise control over one’s life; interference from the perspective of Philip Pettit’s concept of domination-antipower and Sharon Krause’s framing of the socially distributed character of human agency and how technological and human bias impacts freedom. This layered analysis captures the complex impact advanced technologies have on our freedom.\",\"PeriodicalId\":279162,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 31st European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 31st European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3335082.3335099\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 31st European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3335082.3335099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文将提供三部分分析,以证明代表先进技术的自动决策系统(ADMS)可以并且确实破坏了我们的自由。分析将从如何定义自由的三个角度来评估它们对我们自由的影响。基于每一个观点,本文将讨论如何减轻、保护或恢复对我们自由的侵犯。这三部分的分析将集中在查尔斯·泰勒(Charles Taylor)的自主概念上,即对自己的生活进行控制;从菲利普·佩蒂特的统治-反权力概念和莎伦·克劳斯对人类代理的社会分布特征的框架以及技术和人类偏见如何影响自由的角度来研究干涉。这种分层分析抓住了先进技术对我们的自由产生的复杂影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How Freedom is Undermined by Advanced Technology and What to Do About It
This paper will provide a three-part analysis to demonstrate that automated decision-making systems (ADMS), representing advanced technologies, can and do undermine our freedom. The analysis will assess their impact on our freedom with three perspectives of how freedom can be defined. Based on each perspective, the paper will address how the encroachment to our freedom can be mitigated, preserved or regained. The three-part analysis will focus on Charles Taylor’s concept of having autonomy to exercise control over one’s life; interference from the perspective of Philip Pettit’s concept of domination-antipower and Sharon Krause’s framing of the socially distributed character of human agency and how technological and human bias impacts freedom. This layered analysis captures the complex impact advanced technologies have on our freedom.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Towards an empirically developed scale for measuring trust Design Friction Category, Time, and Space: Structures in Cross-Media Design and Production Rethinking Cognitive Ergonomics Older adults eating together in a virtual living room: opportunities and limitations of eating in augmented virtuality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1