参与式设计是瑞典创建资源社区的一种工具

Agatino Rizzo, B. Ekelund, J. Bergström, Kristina Ek
{"title":"参与式设计是瑞典创建资源社区的一种工具","authors":"Agatino Rizzo, B. Ekelund, J. Bergström, Kristina Ek","doi":"10.24140/2020-SCT-VOL.4-1.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For decades, alternative (to carbon) sources of energy in Sweden have been linked to hydroand nuclear power. However, this is set to change as the Swedish government’s agenda has placed extraordinary emphasis on renewables. The implementation of renewables in Sweden poses several challenges. Literature shows that two main aspects deter local communities from embracing large renewable projects: lack of acceptance (of the impacts) and lack of participation (in the making and benefits). Sweden has a long tradition of stakeholder engagement in state-funded projects in the form of participatory meetings and written feedbacks. However, other participatory techniques are less established. Since 2014, we have engaged in research projects dealing with energy landscapes, design thinking, and what we have recently named “resourceful communities”. The aim of this chapter is to report on the results of our recent projects that engage with the above-mentioned concepts/ strategies to foster collaboration and understanding between end-users and other stakeholders.","PeriodicalId":214794,"journal":{"name":"Culture and Territory","volume":"314 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Participatory Design as a Tool to Create Resourceful Communities in Sweden\",\"authors\":\"Agatino Rizzo, B. Ekelund, J. Bergström, Kristina Ek\",\"doi\":\"10.24140/2020-SCT-VOL.4-1.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For decades, alternative (to carbon) sources of energy in Sweden have been linked to hydroand nuclear power. However, this is set to change as the Swedish government’s agenda has placed extraordinary emphasis on renewables. The implementation of renewables in Sweden poses several challenges. Literature shows that two main aspects deter local communities from embracing large renewable projects: lack of acceptance (of the impacts) and lack of participation (in the making and benefits). Sweden has a long tradition of stakeholder engagement in state-funded projects in the form of participatory meetings and written feedbacks. However, other participatory techniques are less established. Since 2014, we have engaged in research projects dealing with energy landscapes, design thinking, and what we have recently named “resourceful communities”. The aim of this chapter is to report on the results of our recent projects that engage with the above-mentioned concepts/ strategies to foster collaboration and understanding between end-users and other stakeholders.\",\"PeriodicalId\":214794,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Culture and Territory\",\"volume\":\"314 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Culture and Territory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24140/2020-SCT-VOL.4-1.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture and Territory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24140/2020-SCT-VOL.4-1.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

几十年来,瑞典的替代能源(碳)一直与水力和核能联系在一起。然而,随着瑞典政府的议程非常重视可再生能源,这种情况将会改变。可再生能源在瑞典的实施面临着几个挑战。文献表明,有两个主要方面阻碍当地社区接受大型可再生能源项目:缺乏接受(影响)和缺乏参与(制定和收益)。瑞典有以参与式会议和书面反馈的形式让利益相关者参与国家资助项目的悠久传统。然而,其他参与性技术还不太成熟。自2014年以来,我们一直从事研究项目,涉及能源景观,设计思维,以及我们最近命名的“资源社区”。本章的目的是报告我们最近采用上述概念/策略的项目的结果,以促进最终用户和其他利益相关者之间的合作和理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Participatory Design as a Tool to Create Resourceful Communities in Sweden
For decades, alternative (to carbon) sources of energy in Sweden have been linked to hydroand nuclear power. However, this is set to change as the Swedish government’s agenda has placed extraordinary emphasis on renewables. The implementation of renewables in Sweden poses several challenges. Literature shows that two main aspects deter local communities from embracing large renewable projects: lack of acceptance (of the impacts) and lack of participation (in the making and benefits). Sweden has a long tradition of stakeholder engagement in state-funded projects in the form of participatory meetings and written feedbacks. However, other participatory techniques are less established. Since 2014, we have engaged in research projects dealing with energy landscapes, design thinking, and what we have recently named “resourceful communities”. The aim of this chapter is to report on the results of our recent projects that engage with the above-mentioned concepts/ strategies to foster collaboration and understanding between end-users and other stakeholders.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Web 2.0 tools as framework for participation and co-creation Public Spaces, spaces of public domain: Icons of a contemporary simulacrum? Modifying and co-creating the urban soundscape through digital technologies Exploring co-creation as a learning process to (re)think public space from a transformative perspective Use and appropriation as the everyday design of public space in the Bexiga Neighbourhood (são paulo)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1