H Van Aken, J Van Hemelrijck, L Merckx, T Möllhoff, J Mulier, H J Lübbesmeyer
{"title":"[异丙酚和阿芬太尼全静脉麻醉与神经外科平衡麻醉的比较]。","authors":"H Van Aken, J Van Hemelrijck, L Merckx, T Möllhoff, J Mulier, H J Lübbesmeyer","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anaesthesia for neurosurgical patients should provide haemodynamic stability, reduce cerebral metabolism, preserve cerebral autoregulation, avoid increases of intracranial pressure and guarantee rapid recovery without respiratory depression. A commonly used Balanced Anaesthesia (BA, n = 20) (thiopental and fentanyl bolus induction and maintenance with repetition boluses of fentanyl and droperidol, thiopental infusion, and isoflurane in N2O/O2) was compared to Total Intravenous Anaesthesia (TIVA, n = 20) with propofol and alfentanil infusion. Pancuronium was employed for muscle relaxation in both groups. The TIVA evinced more haemodynamic stability during induction; notably, there was no increase in blood pressure after intubation, as seen in the BA group. Another advantage of TIVA is that it obviates the use of N2O. Quality of recovery after the procedure was determined by standardised psychometric tests. The time span between awakening of patients to orientation and concentration was significantly shorter in the TIVA group compared to the BA group. There was also a smaller deviation of these parameters in the TIVA group indicating a more predictable recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":7813,"journal":{"name":"Anasthesie, Intensivtherapie, Notfallmedizin","volume":"25 1","pages":"54-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Total intravenous anesthesia using propofol and alfentanil in comparison with balanced anesthesia in neurosurgery].\",\"authors\":\"H Van Aken, J Van Hemelrijck, L Merckx, T Möllhoff, J Mulier, H J Lübbesmeyer\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Anaesthesia for neurosurgical patients should provide haemodynamic stability, reduce cerebral metabolism, preserve cerebral autoregulation, avoid increases of intracranial pressure and guarantee rapid recovery without respiratory depression. A commonly used Balanced Anaesthesia (BA, n = 20) (thiopental and fentanyl bolus induction and maintenance with repetition boluses of fentanyl and droperidol, thiopental infusion, and isoflurane in N2O/O2) was compared to Total Intravenous Anaesthesia (TIVA, n = 20) with propofol and alfentanil infusion. Pancuronium was employed for muscle relaxation in both groups. The TIVA evinced more haemodynamic stability during induction; notably, there was no increase in blood pressure after intubation, as seen in the BA group. Another advantage of TIVA is that it obviates the use of N2O. Quality of recovery after the procedure was determined by standardised psychometric tests. The time span between awakening of patients to orientation and concentration was significantly shorter in the TIVA group compared to the BA group. There was also a smaller deviation of these parameters in the TIVA group indicating a more predictable recovery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7813,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anasthesie, Intensivtherapie, Notfallmedizin\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"54-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anasthesie, Intensivtherapie, Notfallmedizin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anasthesie, Intensivtherapie, Notfallmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
神经外科患者的麻醉应保证血流动力学稳定,减少脑代谢,保持大脑自身调节,避免颅内压升高,保证快速恢复,无呼吸抑制。将一种常用的平衡麻醉(BA, n = 20)(硫喷妥钠和芬太尼丸诱导和维持,芬太尼和哌啶醇重复剂量,硫喷妥钠输注,异氟醚在N2O/O2中)与丙泊酚和阿芬太尼输注全静脉麻醉(TIVA, n = 20)进行比较。两组均应用泮库溴铵进行肌肉松弛。在诱导过程中,TIVA表现出更强的血流动力学稳定性;值得注意的是,与BA组相比,插管后血压没有升高。TIVA的另一个优点是它避免了N2O的使用。手术后的恢复质量由标准化心理测试确定。与BA组相比,TIVA组患者对定向和集中的觉醒时间间隔明显缩短。在TIVA组中,这些参数的偏差也较小,表明恢复更可预测。
[Total intravenous anesthesia using propofol and alfentanil in comparison with balanced anesthesia in neurosurgery].
Anaesthesia for neurosurgical patients should provide haemodynamic stability, reduce cerebral metabolism, preserve cerebral autoregulation, avoid increases of intracranial pressure and guarantee rapid recovery without respiratory depression. A commonly used Balanced Anaesthesia (BA, n = 20) (thiopental and fentanyl bolus induction and maintenance with repetition boluses of fentanyl and droperidol, thiopental infusion, and isoflurane in N2O/O2) was compared to Total Intravenous Anaesthesia (TIVA, n = 20) with propofol and alfentanil infusion. Pancuronium was employed for muscle relaxation in both groups. The TIVA evinced more haemodynamic stability during induction; notably, there was no increase in blood pressure after intubation, as seen in the BA group. Another advantage of TIVA is that it obviates the use of N2O. Quality of recovery after the procedure was determined by standardised psychometric tests. The time span between awakening of patients to orientation and concentration was significantly shorter in the TIVA group compared to the BA group. There was also a smaller deviation of these parameters in the TIVA group indicating a more predictable recovery.