谁写了莎士比亚?

J. Michell
{"title":"谁写了莎士比亚?","authors":"J. Michell","doi":"10.7591/cornell/9781501749704.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter concentrates on the Shakespeare authorship controversy. It examines the correlation between the literary persona that is the author of the Shakespearean corpus with the historical persona that is William of Stratford. It also talks about the English schoolteacher named J. Thomas Looney, who created a profile of the author of the Shakespearean corpus based on the contents of the plays and poetry. The chapter looks into Looney's proposal that Edward de Vere is the author of the Shakespearean corpus. It also discusses the “New Criticism,” which is an approach to literature that intentionally ignores authorship or authorial intent as well as social and cultural context in favor of deep readings of the text and an aesthetic appreciation of its structure and perceived meaning.","PeriodicalId":364483,"journal":{"name":"Who Wrote That?","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who Wrote Shakespeare?\",\"authors\":\"J. Michell\",\"doi\":\"10.7591/cornell/9781501749704.003.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter concentrates on the Shakespeare authorship controversy. It examines the correlation between the literary persona that is the author of the Shakespearean corpus with the historical persona that is William of Stratford. It also talks about the English schoolteacher named J. Thomas Looney, who created a profile of the author of the Shakespearean corpus based on the contents of the plays and poetry. The chapter looks into Looney's proposal that Edward de Vere is the author of the Shakespearean corpus. It also discusses the “New Criticism,” which is an approach to literature that intentionally ignores authorship or authorial intent as well as social and cultural context in favor of deep readings of the text and an aesthetic appreciation of its structure and perceived meaning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":364483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Who Wrote That?\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Who Wrote That?\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501749704.003.0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Who Wrote That?","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501749704.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

这一章集中讨论莎士比亚的作者争议。它考察了文学角色,即莎士比亚文集的作者与历史角色,即斯特拉特福德的威廉之间的关系。它还谈到了一位名叫j·托马斯·鲁尼的英语教师,他根据戏剧和诗歌的内容创建了莎士比亚语料库作者的简介。本章探讨了鲁尼关于爱德华·德维尔是莎士比亚语料库作者的建议。它还讨论了“新批评”,这是一种有意忽略作者身份或作者意图以及社会和文化背景的文学方法,有利于深入阅读文本以及对其结构和感知意义的审美欣赏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Who Wrote Shakespeare?
This chapter concentrates on the Shakespeare authorship controversy. It examines the correlation between the literary persona that is the author of the Shakespearean corpus with the historical persona that is William of Stratford. It also talks about the English schoolteacher named J. Thomas Looney, who created a profile of the author of the Shakespearean corpus based on the contents of the plays and poetry. The chapter looks into Looney's proposal that Edward de Vere is the author of the Shakespearean corpus. It also discusses the “New Criticism,” which is an approach to literature that intentionally ignores authorship or authorial intent as well as social and cultural context in favor of deep readings of the text and an aesthetic appreciation of its structure and perceived meaning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Who Wrote the Analects? Frontmatter Acknowledgments 2. Who Wrote the Analects? Did Abelard and Heloise Write the Letters Attributed to Them?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1