COVID-19疫苗犹豫与品牌选择不确定性

Paula Rodrigues, Ana Pinto Borges, Ana Brochado, Ana Sousa
{"title":"COVID-19疫苗犹豫与品牌选择不确定性","authors":"Paula Rodrigues, Ana Pinto Borges, Ana Brochado, Ana Sousa","doi":"10.1108/ijphm-12-2021-0117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This study aims to examine individual behaviours regarding coronavirus disease-2019 vaccine brands. Design/methodology/approach Firstly, qualitative research identified the reasons for vaccine hesitancy in relation to specific brands using data gathered from 36 semi-structured interviews and processed with Leximancer software. Secondly, a new conceptual model was developed with data from 917 questionnaires and analysed using partial least squares-structural equation modelling. The model integrates health treatment effectiveness, vaccines’ immediate health benefits and individuals’ hope as antecedents of perceived vaccine brand reliability and company reputation and their relationships with choice uncertainty. Findings The results reveal that vaccine hesitancy can be linked with individual, group and contextual and vaccine brand influences and that brand reliability and company reputation antecedents have variable but statistically significant effects on choice uncertainty. Practical implications This research’s contribution lies in its analyses of vaccine acceptance and uncertainty from a vaccine brand perspective. The results can guide brand management policies implemented by public and private organisations. Originality/value This study contributes to academic literature by filling in two gaps. The first was that no prior studies have directly addressed vaccine brands’ impact, whereas the second gap was the need for brand management policies that public (e.g. governments and public health agencies) and private organisations (e.g. pharmaceutical laboratories) can apply.","PeriodicalId":51798,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19 vaccine hesitation and brand choice uncertainty\",\"authors\":\"Paula Rodrigues, Ana Pinto Borges, Ana Brochado, Ana Sousa\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijphm-12-2021-0117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose This study aims to examine individual behaviours regarding coronavirus disease-2019 vaccine brands. Design/methodology/approach Firstly, qualitative research identified the reasons for vaccine hesitancy in relation to specific brands using data gathered from 36 semi-structured interviews and processed with Leximancer software. Secondly, a new conceptual model was developed with data from 917 questionnaires and analysed using partial least squares-structural equation modelling. The model integrates health treatment effectiveness, vaccines’ immediate health benefits and individuals’ hope as antecedents of perceived vaccine brand reliability and company reputation and their relationships with choice uncertainty. Findings The results reveal that vaccine hesitancy can be linked with individual, group and contextual and vaccine brand influences and that brand reliability and company reputation antecedents have variable but statistically significant effects on choice uncertainty. Practical implications This research’s contribution lies in its analyses of vaccine acceptance and uncertainty from a vaccine brand perspective. The results can guide brand management policies implemented by public and private organisations. Originality/value This study contributes to academic literature by filling in two gaps. The first was that no prior studies have directly addressed vaccine brands’ impact, whereas the second gap was the need for brand management policies that public (e.g. governments and public health agencies) and private organisations (e.g. pharmaceutical laboratories) can apply.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51798,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijphm-12-2021-0117\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijphm-12-2021-0117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在研究冠状病毒病-2019疫苗品牌的个体行为。首先,定性研究利用从36个半结构化访谈中收集的数据,并使用Leximancer软件进行处理,确定了与特定品牌相关的疫苗犹豫的原因。其次,利用917份问卷的数据建立了一个新的概念模型,并采用偏最小二乘结构方程模型进行了分析。该模型将健康治疗有效性、疫苗的即时健康效益和个人希望作为感知疫苗品牌可靠性和公司声誉的先决条件,以及它们与选择不确定性的关系。结果表明,疫苗犹豫与个体、群体、情境和疫苗品牌影响有关,而品牌可靠性和公司声誉前因对选择不确定性的影响是可变的,但具有统计学意义。本研究的贡献在于从疫苗品牌的角度分析了疫苗的接受度和不确定性。研究结果可以指导公共和私人组织实施品牌管理政策。原创性/价值本研究填补了学术文献的两个空白。第一个差距是以前没有研究直接解决疫苗品牌的影响,而第二个差距是需要公共(例如政府和公共卫生机构)和私人组织(例如制药实验室)可以应用的品牌管理政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 vaccine hesitation and brand choice uncertainty
Purpose This study aims to examine individual behaviours regarding coronavirus disease-2019 vaccine brands. Design/methodology/approach Firstly, qualitative research identified the reasons for vaccine hesitancy in relation to specific brands using data gathered from 36 semi-structured interviews and processed with Leximancer software. Secondly, a new conceptual model was developed with data from 917 questionnaires and analysed using partial least squares-structural equation modelling. The model integrates health treatment effectiveness, vaccines’ immediate health benefits and individuals’ hope as antecedents of perceived vaccine brand reliability and company reputation and their relationships with choice uncertainty. Findings The results reveal that vaccine hesitancy can be linked with individual, group and contextual and vaccine brand influences and that brand reliability and company reputation antecedents have variable but statistically significant effects on choice uncertainty. Practical implications This research’s contribution lies in its analyses of vaccine acceptance and uncertainty from a vaccine brand perspective. The results can guide brand management policies implemented by public and private organisations. Originality/value This study contributes to academic literature by filling in two gaps. The first was that no prior studies have directly addressed vaccine brands’ impact, whereas the second gap was the need for brand management policies that public (e.g. governments and public health agencies) and private organisations (e.g. pharmaceutical laboratories) can apply.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Purchase intent in social media for healthcare services: the influence of value co-creation, brand equity and engagement Revealing the synergetic influence of pharmaceutical marketing strategies on physician prescription patterns: a moderated mediation investigation COVID-sumers: consumers’ feelings due Covid-19 pandemic in Brazil and potential implications for services marketing Role of fashion-consciousness, health-awareness and environmental concerns on millennials’ usage of smartwatches Managing my own health! An ancillary outlook on pharmaceutical and health supplements consumption
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1