CC14指南更新:更绿色的投资,更大的不确定性?

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW Trusts & Trustees Pub Date : 2023-11-14 DOI:10.1093/tandt/ttad085
Lloyd Brown
{"title":"CC14指南更新:更绿色的投资,更大的不确定性?","authors":"Lloyd Brown","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttad085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article examines the newly released Charity Commission guidance, known simply as the “CC14”. The CC14 provides investment guidance to the charity sector and has recently been renewed following the case of Butler-Sloss & Ors v The Charity Commission for England and Wales & Anor [2022] EWHC 974 (Ch). In Butler-Sloss, the High Court was asked to determine whether charitable trustees could deploy an investment plan that aligned with the Paris Agreement and excluded investments that contributed to climate change. Mr Michael Green J ruled that such an “ethical” investment plan was lawful. Following Butler-Sloss, the CC14’s use of “social investment” may indeed encourage “greener” investment opportunities amongst charitable trustees, in that the advice attempts to bring charitable trustee investment more in line with modern investment practices. However, this work opines that the guidance could be actively encouraging environmentally inspired investments at the expense of the sacrosanct fiduciary duty of investment.","PeriodicalId":43396,"journal":{"name":"Trusts & Trustees","volume":"79 23","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CC14 guidance update: greener investments, greater uncertainty?\",\"authors\":\"Lloyd Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/tandt/ttad085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article examines the newly released Charity Commission guidance, known simply as the “CC14”. The CC14 provides investment guidance to the charity sector and has recently been renewed following the case of Butler-Sloss & Ors v The Charity Commission for England and Wales & Anor [2022] EWHC 974 (Ch). In Butler-Sloss, the High Court was asked to determine whether charitable trustees could deploy an investment plan that aligned with the Paris Agreement and excluded investments that contributed to climate change. Mr Michael Green J ruled that such an “ethical” investment plan was lawful. Following Butler-Sloss, the CC14’s use of “social investment” may indeed encourage “greener” investment opportunities amongst charitable trustees, in that the advice attempts to bring charitable trustee investment more in line with modern investment practices. However, this work opines that the guidance could be actively encouraging environmentally inspired investments at the expense of the sacrosanct fiduciary duty of investment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trusts & Trustees\",\"volume\":\"79 23\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trusts & Trustees\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttad085\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trusts & Trustees","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttad085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了新发布的慈善委员会指导意见,简称“CC14”。CC14为慈善部门提供投资指导,最近在Butler-Sloss &Ors诉英格兰和威尔士慈善委员会& &;Anor [2022] EWHC 974 (Ch)。在巴特勒-斯洛斯案中,高等法院被要求确定慈善受托人是否可以部署与《巴黎协定》一致的投资计划,并排除导致气候变化的投资。迈克尔•格林裁定,这种“合乎道德”的投资计划是合法的。继Butler-Sloss之后,CC14对“社会投资”的使用可能确实鼓励慈善受托人进行“更环保”的投资机会,因为该建议试图使慈善受托人的投资更符合现代投资惯例。然而,这项工作认为,指导方针可能会以牺牲神圣的投资信托义务为代价,积极鼓励环境方面的投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CC14 guidance update: greener investments, greater uncertainty?
Abstract This article examines the newly released Charity Commission guidance, known simply as the “CC14”. The CC14 provides investment guidance to the charity sector and has recently been renewed following the case of Butler-Sloss & Ors v The Charity Commission for England and Wales & Anor [2022] EWHC 974 (Ch). In Butler-Sloss, the High Court was asked to determine whether charitable trustees could deploy an investment plan that aligned with the Paris Agreement and excluded investments that contributed to climate change. Mr Michael Green J ruled that such an “ethical” investment plan was lawful. Following Butler-Sloss, the CC14’s use of “social investment” may indeed encourage “greener” investment opportunities amongst charitable trustees, in that the advice attempts to bring charitable trustee investment more in line with modern investment practices. However, this work opines that the guidance could be actively encouraging environmentally inspired investments at the expense of the sacrosanct fiduciary duty of investment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
66.70%
发文量
92
期刊最新文献
CC14 guidance update: greener investments, greater uncertainty? Australian tax arrangements for trusts: Section 100A of the Income Tax Assessment Act (1936) Cth Fathers, daughters, and matters of trust In brief An analysis of the risks that arise for discretionary trust settlements in the event of a divorce: to what extent does the Family Court’s asset division approach undermine discretionary trusts?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1