Richard A. Pickett, John W. Nowlin, Ahmed A. Hashem, Michele L. Reba, Joseph H. Massey, Scott Alsbrook
{"title":"小型无人机系统与农业地面测量的比较:为灌溉和精确分级生成数字高程面","authors":"Richard A. Pickett, John W. Nowlin, Ahmed A. Hashem, Michele L. Reba, Joseph H. Massey, Scott Alsbrook","doi":"10.3390/drones7110649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Advances in remote sensing and small unmanned aircraft systems (sUAS) have been applied to various precision agriculture applications. However, there has been limited research on the accuracy of real-time kinematic (RTK) sUAS photogrammetric elevation surveys, especially in preparation for precision agriculture practices that require precise topographic surfaces, such as increasing irrigation system efficiency. These practices include, but are not limited to, precision land grading, placement of levees, multiple inlet rice irrigation, and computerized hole size selection for furrow irrigation. All such practices rely, in some way, on the characterization of surface topography. While agro-terrestrial (ground-based) surveying is the dominant method of agricultural surveying, aerial surveying is emerging and attracting potential early adopters. This is the first study of its kind to assess the accuracy, precision, time, and cost efficiency of RTK sUAS surveying in comparison to traditional agro-terrestrial techniques. Our findings suggest sUAS are superior to ground survey methods in terms of relative elevation and produce much more precise raster surfaces than ground-based methods. We also showed that this emergent technology reduces costs and the time it takes to generate agricultural elevation surveys.","PeriodicalId":36448,"journal":{"name":"Drones","volume":"4 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems and Agro-Terrestrial Surveys Comparison for Generating Digital Elevation Surfaces for Irrigation and Precision Grading\",\"authors\":\"Richard A. Pickett, John W. Nowlin, Ahmed A. Hashem, Michele L. Reba, Joseph H. Massey, Scott Alsbrook\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/drones7110649\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Advances in remote sensing and small unmanned aircraft systems (sUAS) have been applied to various precision agriculture applications. However, there has been limited research on the accuracy of real-time kinematic (RTK) sUAS photogrammetric elevation surveys, especially in preparation for precision agriculture practices that require precise topographic surfaces, such as increasing irrigation system efficiency. These practices include, but are not limited to, precision land grading, placement of levees, multiple inlet rice irrigation, and computerized hole size selection for furrow irrigation. All such practices rely, in some way, on the characterization of surface topography. While agro-terrestrial (ground-based) surveying is the dominant method of agricultural surveying, aerial surveying is emerging and attracting potential early adopters. This is the first study of its kind to assess the accuracy, precision, time, and cost efficiency of RTK sUAS surveying in comparison to traditional agro-terrestrial techniques. Our findings suggest sUAS are superior to ground survey methods in terms of relative elevation and produce much more precise raster surfaces than ground-based methods. We also showed that this emergent technology reduces costs and the time it takes to generate agricultural elevation surveys.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36448,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drones\",\"volume\":\"4 6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drones\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/drones7110649\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REMOTE SENSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drones","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/drones7110649","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REMOTE SENSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems and Agro-Terrestrial Surveys Comparison for Generating Digital Elevation Surfaces for Irrigation and Precision Grading
Advances in remote sensing and small unmanned aircraft systems (sUAS) have been applied to various precision agriculture applications. However, there has been limited research on the accuracy of real-time kinematic (RTK) sUAS photogrammetric elevation surveys, especially in preparation for precision agriculture practices that require precise topographic surfaces, such as increasing irrigation system efficiency. These practices include, but are not limited to, precision land grading, placement of levees, multiple inlet rice irrigation, and computerized hole size selection for furrow irrigation. All such practices rely, in some way, on the characterization of surface topography. While agro-terrestrial (ground-based) surveying is the dominant method of agricultural surveying, aerial surveying is emerging and attracting potential early adopters. This is the first study of its kind to assess the accuracy, precision, time, and cost efficiency of RTK sUAS surveying in comparison to traditional agro-terrestrial techniques. Our findings suggest sUAS are superior to ground survey methods in terms of relative elevation and produce much more precise raster surfaces than ground-based methods. We also showed that this emergent technology reduces costs and the time it takes to generate agricultural elevation surveys.