从技术和经济角度论证了采用排水沥青混凝土铺设覆盖物技术的可行性

None A.D. Zheltobriukh, None V.Y. Savenko
{"title":"从技术和经济角度论证了采用排水沥青混凝土铺设覆盖物技术的可行性","authors":"None A.D. Zheltobriukh, None V.Y. Savenko","doi":"10.31435/rsglobal_ws/30092023/8052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study assesses the economic viability of utilizing porous asphalt concrete in comparison to crushed-mastic asphalt concrete, both of which share similar applications and use cases. Key differentiators affecting costs between these two asphalt concrete types are identified, including fuel consumption during production, material expenses, and overall mixture costs. Methodologies encompassing technical specifications and experimental investigations are applied, employing analytical and comparative techniques.A comprehensive technical and economic evaluation of porous and crushed-mastic asphalt concrete is conducted, factoring in identified cost variables. To determine comparative economic efficiency, industry-standard resource consumption metrics, material utilization norms, recommendations, and laboratory analyses are incorporated. Estimates are derived using aggregated data and the price calculator provided by the State Enterprise \"DerzhdorNDI SE,\" referencing June 2023 data from Ukraine's infrastructure restoration and development services. Analysis reveals that, when assessing material, production, and installation costs exclusively, porous asphalt concrete demonstrates superior economic advantages. Furthermore, the study establishes that the implementation of porous asphalt concrete has the potential to reduce road accidents substantially. This reduction in accidents yields significant economic benefits by mitigating overall socio-economic losses stemming from traffic incidents, thus counterbalancing expenses associated with specific challenges linked to winter maintenance and the cleaning of asphalt pores.","PeriodicalId":19855,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy World & Science","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TECHNICAL AND ECONOMIC JUSTIFICATION OF THE FEASIBILITY OF USING THE TECHNOLOGY OF LAYING COVERS FROM DRAINING ASPHALT CONCRETE\",\"authors\":\"None A.D. Zheltobriukh, None V.Y. Savenko\",\"doi\":\"10.31435/rsglobal_ws/30092023/8052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study assesses the economic viability of utilizing porous asphalt concrete in comparison to crushed-mastic asphalt concrete, both of which share similar applications and use cases. Key differentiators affecting costs between these two asphalt concrete types are identified, including fuel consumption during production, material expenses, and overall mixture costs. Methodologies encompassing technical specifications and experimental investigations are applied, employing analytical and comparative techniques.A comprehensive technical and economic evaluation of porous and crushed-mastic asphalt concrete is conducted, factoring in identified cost variables. To determine comparative economic efficiency, industry-standard resource consumption metrics, material utilization norms, recommendations, and laboratory analyses are incorporated. Estimates are derived using aggregated data and the price calculator provided by the State Enterprise \\\"DerzhdorNDI SE,\\\" referencing June 2023 data from Ukraine's infrastructure restoration and development services. Analysis reveals that, when assessing material, production, and installation costs exclusively, porous asphalt concrete demonstrates superior economic advantages. Furthermore, the study establishes that the implementation of porous asphalt concrete has the potential to reduce road accidents substantially. This reduction in accidents yields significant economic benefits by mitigating overall socio-economic losses stemming from traffic incidents, thus counterbalancing expenses associated with specific challenges linked to winter maintenance and the cleaning of asphalt pores.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacy World & Science\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacy World & Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31435/rsglobal_ws/30092023/8052\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacy World & Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31435/rsglobal_ws/30092023/8052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估了利用多孔沥青混凝土与破碎沥青混凝土的经济可行性,两者具有相似的应用和用例。确定了影响这两种沥青混凝土类型成本的关键因素,包括生产过程中的燃料消耗、材料费用和总体混合成本。方法包括技术规范和实验调查的应用,采用分析和比较技术。考虑已确定的成本变量,对多孔沥青混凝土和破碎沥青混凝土进行了综合技术经济评价。为了确定比较经济效率,结合了行业标准的资源消耗指标、材料利用规范、建议和实验室分析。估算是使用汇总数据和国有企业“DerzhdorNDI SE”提供的价格计算器得出的,参考了乌克兰基础设施恢复和发展服务的2023年6月数据。分析表明,在单独评估材料、生产和安装成本时,多孔沥青混凝土具有优越的经济优势。此外,研究表明,多孔沥青混凝土的实施有可能大大减少道路事故。通过减少交通事故造成的整体社会经济损失,从而抵消与冬季维护和沥青孔隙清洁相关的特定挑战相关的费用,事故的减少产生了显著的经济效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
TECHNICAL AND ECONOMIC JUSTIFICATION OF THE FEASIBILITY OF USING THE TECHNOLOGY OF LAYING COVERS FROM DRAINING ASPHALT CONCRETE
This study assesses the economic viability of utilizing porous asphalt concrete in comparison to crushed-mastic asphalt concrete, both of which share similar applications and use cases. Key differentiators affecting costs between these two asphalt concrete types are identified, including fuel consumption during production, material expenses, and overall mixture costs. Methodologies encompassing technical specifications and experimental investigations are applied, employing analytical and comparative techniques.A comprehensive technical and economic evaluation of porous and crushed-mastic asphalt concrete is conducted, factoring in identified cost variables. To determine comparative economic efficiency, industry-standard resource consumption metrics, material utilization norms, recommendations, and laboratory analyses are incorporated. Estimates are derived using aggregated data and the price calculator provided by the State Enterprise "DerzhdorNDI SE," referencing June 2023 data from Ukraine's infrastructure restoration and development services. Analysis reveals that, when assessing material, production, and installation costs exclusively, porous asphalt concrete demonstrates superior economic advantages. Furthermore, the study establishes that the implementation of porous asphalt concrete has the potential to reduce road accidents substantially. This reduction in accidents yields significant economic benefits by mitigating overall socio-economic losses stemming from traffic incidents, thus counterbalancing expenses associated with specific challenges linked to winter maintenance and the cleaning of asphalt pores.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacy World & Science
Pharmacy World & Science 医学-药学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
RESULTS OF DETERMINING THE HARDNESS OF THE SEED COAT OF GRAINS GROWN IN MONGOLIA TECHNICAL AND ECONOMIC JUSTIFICATION OF THE FEASIBILITY OF USING THE TECHNOLOGY OF LAYING COVERS FROM DRAINING ASPHALT CONCRETE BIODEGRADATION OF WASTED BIOPLASTICS DETERMINATION OF THE COMPOSITION OF ASPHALT CONCRETE MIXTURES BASED ON EPOXY COMPONENTS FOR THEIR APPLICATION AS THIN-LAYER COATINGS OF ROAD BRIDGES DETERMINING HEAT LOSSES FROM THE BUILDING ENVELOPE USING THE NON-STATIONARY METHOD
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1