寻找护理教育解剖课最有效的教学方法:经典课堂与翻转课堂之比较

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL European Journal of Therapeutics Pub Date : 2023-09-19 DOI:10.58600/eurjther1767
Ümran Gözde Çeliker, Serra Öztürk, Mustafa Kemal Alimoğlu, Levent Sarıkcıoğlu, Erol Gürpınar, Muzaffer Sindel
{"title":"寻找护理教育解剖课最有效的教学方法:经典课堂与翻转课堂之比较","authors":"Ümran Gözde Çeliker, Serra Öztürk, Mustafa Kemal Alimoğlu, Levent Sarıkcıoğlu, Erol Gürpınar, Muzaffer Sindel","doi":"10.58600/eurjther1767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The objective of this research is to determine the comparative superiority between classical face-to-face education and flipped classroom models from the students' perspective. Methods: This educational intervention study involved 109 first-term students from Akdeniz University Faculty of Nursing who participated in all the discussed flipped training and classical lecture courses. The study included the administration of feedback forms and an exam. Results: The averages of the total student feedback scores for the classical lecture and flipped classroom were 45.9± 11.7 and 46.0± 8.5, respectively, and the difference between them was not statistically significant (student t-test, p=0.986). The mean of the knowledge acquisition test total scores were found to be 4.79 ± 1.62 and 4.82 ± 1.65, respectively, and the difference between them was not statistically significant (student t-test, p=0.872) Conclusion: In conclusion, the results suggest that while the flipped classroom approach does not negatively impact knowledge acquisition or student satisfaction compared to traditional lectures, it does not offer a significant overall advantage. Further research and exploration may be needed to fully understand the potential benefits and limitations of the flipped classroom model in enhancing critical thinking skills and knowledge absorption.","PeriodicalId":42642,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Therapeutics","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Finding the Most Effective Method in Anatomy Lesson in Nursing Education: A Comparison of Classical Lecture and Flipped Classroom\",\"authors\":\"Ümran Gözde Çeliker, Serra Öztürk, Mustafa Kemal Alimoğlu, Levent Sarıkcıoğlu, Erol Gürpınar, Muzaffer Sindel\",\"doi\":\"10.58600/eurjther1767\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The objective of this research is to determine the comparative superiority between classical face-to-face education and flipped classroom models from the students' perspective. Methods: This educational intervention study involved 109 first-term students from Akdeniz University Faculty of Nursing who participated in all the discussed flipped training and classical lecture courses. The study included the administration of feedback forms and an exam. Results: The averages of the total student feedback scores for the classical lecture and flipped classroom were 45.9± 11.7 and 46.0± 8.5, respectively, and the difference between them was not statistically significant (student t-test, p=0.986). The mean of the knowledge acquisition test total scores were found to be 4.79 ± 1.62 and 4.82 ± 1.65, respectively, and the difference between them was not statistically significant (student t-test, p=0.872) Conclusion: In conclusion, the results suggest that while the flipped classroom approach does not negatively impact knowledge acquisition or student satisfaction compared to traditional lectures, it does not offer a significant overall advantage. Further research and exploration may be needed to fully understand the potential benefits and limitations of the flipped classroom model in enhancing critical thinking skills and knowledge absorption.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"95 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58600/eurjther1767\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58600/eurjther1767","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是从学生的角度来确定经典的面对面教育与翻转课堂模式的比较优势。方法:对109名阿克德尼兹大学护理学院一年级学生进行教育干预研究,这些学生参加了所有的讨论式翻转训练和经典讲座课程。这项研究包括反馈表格的管理和考试。结果:经典课堂与翻转课堂的学生反馈总分平均值分别为45.9±11.7分和46.0±8.5分,差异无统计学意义(学生t检验,p=0.986)。知识习得测试总分的平均值分别为4.79±1.62和4.82±1.65,两者之间的差异无统计学意义(学生t检验,p=0.872)。结论:与传统教学相比,翻转课堂教学对知识习得和学生满意度没有负面影响,但总体上没有显著优势。要充分了解翻转课堂模式在提高批判性思维技能和知识吸收方面的潜在好处和局限性,还需要进一步的研究和探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Finding the Most Effective Method in Anatomy Lesson in Nursing Education: A Comparison of Classical Lecture and Flipped Classroom
Objective: The objective of this research is to determine the comparative superiority between classical face-to-face education and flipped classroom models from the students' perspective. Methods: This educational intervention study involved 109 first-term students from Akdeniz University Faculty of Nursing who participated in all the discussed flipped training and classical lecture courses. The study included the administration of feedback forms and an exam. Results: The averages of the total student feedback scores for the classical lecture and flipped classroom were 45.9± 11.7 and 46.0± 8.5, respectively, and the difference between them was not statistically significant (student t-test, p=0.986). The mean of the knowledge acquisition test total scores were found to be 4.79 ± 1.62 and 4.82 ± 1.65, respectively, and the difference between them was not statistically significant (student t-test, p=0.872) Conclusion: In conclusion, the results suggest that while the flipped classroom approach does not negatively impact knowledge acquisition or student satisfaction compared to traditional lectures, it does not offer a significant overall advantage. Further research and exploration may be needed to fully understand the potential benefits and limitations of the flipped classroom model in enhancing critical thinking skills and knowledge absorption.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Therapeutics
European Journal of Therapeutics MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
期刊最新文献
Immunoglobulin-G4 Related Disease with Multiple Organ Involvement Welcome to the December 2023 Issue (Vol:29, No:4) and Current News of the European Journal of Therapeutics Protective Effect of Pomegranate Juice on Lead Acetate-Induced Liver Toxicity in Male Rats Tubuloside A Induces DNA Damage and Apoptosis in Human Ovarian Cancer A2780 Cells Correction to: Correlation of Diffusion-weighted MR imaging and FDG PET/CT in the Diagnosis of Metastatic Lymph Nodes of Head and Neck Malignant Tumors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1