尿路感染中大肠杆菌和克雷伯菌对甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑和环丙沙星耐药率的10年评价

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Klimik Journal Pub Date : 2023-09-30 DOI:10.36519/kd.2023.4558
Pinar Samlioglu, Ilknur Kilic
{"title":"尿路感染中大肠杆菌和克雷伯菌对甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑和环丙沙星耐药率的10年评价","authors":"Pinar Samlioglu, Ilknur Kilic","doi":"10.36519/kd.2023.4558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Urinary tract infections are the most common bacterial infections among community-acquired infections in all age groups. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the distribution of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. in community-acquired urinary tract infections by years and the resistance rates to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SXT) and ciprofloxacin antibiotics, which are used as the first choice in community-acquired urinary tract infections. Methods: All urine culture samples from all age groups admitted to the medical microbiology laboratory from outpatient clinics and emergency services between January 2011 and August 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Samples with E. coli and Klebsiella spp. detected as causative agents in urine cultures were included in the study. Conventional methods and automated systems were used to identify bacteria and for antibiotic susceptibility tests. Results: E. coli (n=50 430) and Klebsiella spp. (n=7763) isolated from urine cultures between January 2011 and August 2021 were evaluated. The lowest and highest resistance rates for ciprofloxacin and TMP-SXT for E. coli were 25-40% and 35-51%, respectively. Ciprofloxacin and TMP-SXT resistance rates for Klebsiella spp. were the lowest and highest at 17-43% and 31-43%, respectively. Conclusion: Knowing the resistance rates of antibiotics used as the first choice against common agents such as E. coli and Klebsiella spp. in treating community-acquired urinary tract infections may guide the empirical antimicrobial therapy.","PeriodicalId":44309,"journal":{"name":"Klimik Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole and Ciprofloxacin Resistance Rates in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. in Urinary Tract Infections: A 10-Year Evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Pinar Samlioglu, Ilknur Kilic\",\"doi\":\"10.36519/kd.2023.4558\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Urinary tract infections are the most common bacterial infections among community-acquired infections in all age groups. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the distribution of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. in community-acquired urinary tract infections by years and the resistance rates to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SXT) and ciprofloxacin antibiotics, which are used as the first choice in community-acquired urinary tract infections. Methods: All urine culture samples from all age groups admitted to the medical microbiology laboratory from outpatient clinics and emergency services between January 2011 and August 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Samples with E. coli and Klebsiella spp. detected as causative agents in urine cultures were included in the study. Conventional methods and automated systems were used to identify bacteria and for antibiotic susceptibility tests. Results: E. coli (n=50 430) and Klebsiella spp. (n=7763) isolated from urine cultures between January 2011 and August 2021 were evaluated. The lowest and highest resistance rates for ciprofloxacin and TMP-SXT for E. coli were 25-40% and 35-51%, respectively. Ciprofloxacin and TMP-SXT resistance rates for Klebsiella spp. were the lowest and highest at 17-43% and 31-43%, respectively. Conclusion: Knowing the resistance rates of antibiotics used as the first choice against common agents such as E. coli and Klebsiella spp. in treating community-acquired urinary tract infections may guide the empirical antimicrobial therapy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Klimik Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Klimik Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36519/kd.2023.4558\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Klimik Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36519/kd.2023.4558","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:尿路感染是各年龄组社区获得性感染中最常见的细菌感染。在本研究中,我们旨在评估大肠杆菌和克雷伯菌在社区获得性尿路感染中的分布情况,以及对社区获得性尿路感染首选抗生素甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑(TMP-SXT)和环丙沙星的耐药率。方法:回顾性分析2011年1月至2021年8月期间门诊和急诊医学微生物实验室收治的所有年龄组尿液培养样本。在尿液培养物中检测到大肠杆菌和克雷伯氏杆菌作为病原体的样本包括在研究中。常规方法和自动化系统用于细菌鉴定和抗生素敏感性试验。结果:对2011年1月至2021年8月尿液培养中分离的大肠杆菌(n= 50430)和克雷伯氏菌(n=7763)进行了评估。大肠杆菌对环丙沙星和TMP-SXT的最低耐药率为25-40%,最高耐药率为35-51%。克雷伯菌对环丙沙星和TMP-SXT的耐药率最低,分别为17-43%和31-43%。结论:了解社区获得性尿路感染首选抗生素对大肠杆菌、克雷伯氏菌等常见药物的耐药率,可指导临床用药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole and Ciprofloxacin Resistance Rates in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. in Urinary Tract Infections: A 10-Year Evaluation
Objective: Urinary tract infections are the most common bacterial infections among community-acquired infections in all age groups. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the distribution of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. in community-acquired urinary tract infections by years and the resistance rates to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SXT) and ciprofloxacin antibiotics, which are used as the first choice in community-acquired urinary tract infections. Methods: All urine culture samples from all age groups admitted to the medical microbiology laboratory from outpatient clinics and emergency services between January 2011 and August 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Samples with E. coli and Klebsiella spp. detected as causative agents in urine cultures were included in the study. Conventional methods and automated systems were used to identify bacteria and for antibiotic susceptibility tests. Results: E. coli (n=50 430) and Klebsiella spp. (n=7763) isolated from urine cultures between January 2011 and August 2021 were evaluated. The lowest and highest resistance rates for ciprofloxacin and TMP-SXT for E. coli were 25-40% and 35-51%, respectively. Ciprofloxacin and TMP-SXT resistance rates for Klebsiella spp. were the lowest and highest at 17-43% and 31-43%, respectively. Conclusion: Knowing the resistance rates of antibiotics used as the first choice against common agents such as E. coli and Klebsiella spp. in treating community-acquired urinary tract infections may guide the empirical antimicrobial therapy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Klimik Journal
Klimik Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
Fourth-year Results of HBeAg Negative Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Discontinuing Nucleos(t)ide Analogue Therapy Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole and Ciprofloxacin Resistance Rates in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. in Urinary Tract Infections: A 10-Year Evaluation The Incidence and Factors Affecting the 28-day Hospital Admission Among Adult Ambulatory COVID-19 Patients Correlation of Real-Time PCR Cycle Threshold Values and Clinical Progress, Mortality, and Laboratory Parameters of COVID-19 Patients Evaluation of Risk Factors Causing Nosocomial Acinetobacter Bacteremia and Mortality in the Intensive Care Unit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1