重复冲刺之间不同时间间隔对业余五人制运动员运动表现反应的急性影响

Leandro De Oliveira Sant'Ana, Lucas Muniz Carnevalli, Sérgio Machado, Gilmar Weber Senna, Estevão Scudese, Jeferson Macedo Vianna, Cristiano Queiroz de Oliveira
{"title":"重复冲刺之间不同时间间隔对业余五人制运动员运动表现反应的急性影响","authors":"Leandro De Oliveira Sant'Ana, Lucas Muniz Carnevalli, Sérgio Machado, Gilmar Weber Senna, Estevão Scudese, Jeferson Macedo Vianna, Cristiano Queiroz de Oliveira","doi":"10.4025/jphyseduc.v34i1.3408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Verify the influence of different break times between sprints on the performance of amateur futsal athletes. Methods: 10 individuals, men, amateur futsal athletes (Age: 21.5 ± 1.6; Weight: 72.4 ± 6.88; Height: 1.72 ± 0.05; BMI: 24.3 ± 1.2; Fat%: 13.7 ± 3.3, VO2peak: 49.1 ± 10.5) participated in the study. Individuals were randomly selected to perform sessions with sprints (10 sets 20 m) with different pause times of 15 (S15), 30 (S30) and 60 (S60) seconds. For performance analysis, the speed (km / h) applied to each sprint was used and monitored by a device with a photocell (CEFISE Biotecnologia Esportiva®). Results: There was an interaction between speed and interval time (p = 0.000). For condition S15, a greater reduction in performance was observed (p ≤ 0.05), while for S30 and S60, no significant reduction in performance was observed (p > 0.05). The data for the area under the curve showed a significant difference (p = 0.000), where the interval of 60 s (S60) was longer compared to the values of 30 (S30) (p = 0.000) and 15 s (S15) (p = 0.000). However, there were no significant differences between the 30 and 15 s data (p = 0.248). Conclusion: A shorter time (15 s) interval between repeated sprints can significantly affect performance compared to longer breaks (30 and 60 s), but all the conditions tested here can be positive for the improvement of performance, mainly in sports that demand fast and efficient motor actions such as futsal.","PeriodicalId":16809,"journal":{"name":"journal of physical education","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acute effects of different intervals between repeated sprints on performance responses in amateur futsal athletes\",\"authors\":\"Leandro De Oliveira Sant'Ana, Lucas Muniz Carnevalli, Sérgio Machado, Gilmar Weber Senna, Estevão Scudese, Jeferson Macedo Vianna, Cristiano Queiroz de Oliveira\",\"doi\":\"10.4025/jphyseduc.v34i1.3408\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Verify the influence of different break times between sprints on the performance of amateur futsal athletes. Methods: 10 individuals, men, amateur futsal athletes (Age: 21.5 ± 1.6; Weight: 72.4 ± 6.88; Height: 1.72 ± 0.05; BMI: 24.3 ± 1.2; Fat%: 13.7 ± 3.3, VO2peak: 49.1 ± 10.5) participated in the study. Individuals were randomly selected to perform sessions with sprints (10 sets 20 m) with different pause times of 15 (S15), 30 (S30) and 60 (S60) seconds. For performance analysis, the speed (km / h) applied to each sprint was used and monitored by a device with a photocell (CEFISE Biotecnologia Esportiva®). Results: There was an interaction between speed and interval time (p = 0.000). For condition S15, a greater reduction in performance was observed (p ≤ 0.05), while for S30 and S60, no significant reduction in performance was observed (p > 0.05). The data for the area under the curve showed a significant difference (p = 0.000), where the interval of 60 s (S60) was longer compared to the values of 30 (S30) (p = 0.000) and 15 s (S15) (p = 0.000). However, there were no significant differences between the 30 and 15 s data (p = 0.248). Conclusion: A shorter time (15 s) interval between repeated sprints can significantly affect performance compared to longer breaks (30 and 60 s), but all the conditions tested here can be positive for the improvement of performance, mainly in sports that demand fast and efficient motor actions such as futsal.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"journal of physical education\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"journal of physical education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4025/jphyseduc.v34i1.3408\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"journal of physical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4025/jphyseduc.v34i1.3408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:验证不同短跑间歇时间对业余五人制运动员成绩的影响。方法:10人,男性,业余五人制运动员(年龄:21.5±1.6;重量:72.4±6.88;身高:1.72±0.05;Bmi: 24.3±1.2;脂肪%:13.7±3.3,VO2peak: 49.1±10.5)参加研究。随机选择个体进行冲刺(10组20米),暂停时间分别为15 (S15)、30 (S30)和60 (S60)秒。为了进行性能分析,每次冲刺的速度(km / h)由带有光电池的设备(CEFISE biotecologia Esportiva®)进行监测。结果:速度与间隔时间之间存在交互作用(p = 0.000)。在S15条件下,性能下降幅度较大(p≤0.05),而在S30和S60条件下,性能没有显著下降(p >0.05)。曲线下面积的数据显示有显著差异(p = 0.000),其中60 s (S60)的间隔较30 s (S30) (p = 0.000)和15 s (S15) (p = 0.000)的值更长。然而,30秒和15秒的数据没有显著差异(p = 0.248)。结论:与较长的休息时间(30秒和60秒)相比,较短的时间间隔(15秒)对重复冲刺的表现有显著影响,但这里测试的所有条件都对提高表现有积极作用,主要是在需要快速有效的运动动作的运动中,如五人制足球。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Acute effects of different intervals between repeated sprints on performance responses in amateur futsal athletes
Objective: Verify the influence of different break times between sprints on the performance of amateur futsal athletes. Methods: 10 individuals, men, amateur futsal athletes (Age: 21.5 ± 1.6; Weight: 72.4 ± 6.88; Height: 1.72 ± 0.05; BMI: 24.3 ± 1.2; Fat%: 13.7 ± 3.3, VO2peak: 49.1 ± 10.5) participated in the study. Individuals were randomly selected to perform sessions with sprints (10 sets 20 m) with different pause times of 15 (S15), 30 (S30) and 60 (S60) seconds. For performance analysis, the speed (km / h) applied to each sprint was used and monitored by a device with a photocell (CEFISE Biotecnologia Esportiva®). Results: There was an interaction between speed and interval time (p = 0.000). For condition S15, a greater reduction in performance was observed (p ≤ 0.05), while for S30 and S60, no significant reduction in performance was observed (p > 0.05). The data for the area under the curve showed a significant difference (p = 0.000), where the interval of 60 s (S60) was longer compared to the values of 30 (S30) (p = 0.000) and 15 s (S15) (p = 0.000). However, there were no significant differences between the 30 and 15 s data (p = 0.248). Conclusion: A shorter time (15 s) interval between repeated sprints can significantly affect performance compared to longer breaks (30 and 60 s), but all the conditions tested here can be positive for the improvement of performance, mainly in sports that demand fast and efficient motor actions such as futsal.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Atividade física total e em domínios antes e durante a pandemia de Covid-19 em adolescentes de uma cidade brasileira Knowledge about recommendations for physical activity and personal practices of primary health care professionals Time in sedentary behavior and physical activity as discriminators of diabesity in quilombolas Analysis of the quality of bicycle paths and their relationship with bicycle use in Florianópolis Daily physical activity in children enrolled in extracurricular activity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1