最高法院推翻其具有约束力的法律意见的先决条件

IF 0.3 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Revista de la Universidad del Zulia Pub Date : 2023-09-07 DOI:10.46925//rdluz.41.34
Yevhenii Doiar, Pavlo Liutikov, Vladyslav Lipynskyi, Nataliya Kantor
{"title":"最高法院推翻其具有约束力的法律意见的先决条件","authors":"Yevhenii Doiar, Pavlo Liutikov, Vladyslav Lipynskyi, Nataliya Kantor","doi":"10.46925//rdluz.41.34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper aims at developing recommendations for improving procedural laws and guiding case law related to reasons for a supreme court to overrule its universally binding legal opinions with a particular emphasis on relevant Ukrainian legal context as a perfectly illustrative example. This research purpose prompts the reliance on a set of appropriate scientific methods of descriptive and comparative law research including the comparative analysis itself as a fundamental instrument for review of relevant legal material, as well as the structural, analytical and law-in-context scientific methods. The paper covers, in particular, a)Ukrainian statutory framework and case law regulating of the Supreme Court of Ukraine's departure from its legal opinions; b)concepts of overrulingprecedents of the highest courts of the most developed countries with common law legal system; c)current views of scientific community and prospects of development of the relevant case lawon Supreme Court of Ukraineoverruling its legal opinions.The authors maintain that it is extremely important to substantiate compelling reasons for a supreme court to review its vision of the correct application of the Law, exposing the reasons for considering the previous one defective, to the extent that it leads tofundamental negative consequences.","PeriodicalId":42302,"journal":{"name":"Revista de la Universidad del Zulia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prerequisites for a Supreme Court to Overrule its Binding Legal Opinions\",\"authors\":\"Yevhenii Doiar, Pavlo Liutikov, Vladyslav Lipynskyi, Nataliya Kantor\",\"doi\":\"10.46925//rdluz.41.34\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper aims at developing recommendations for improving procedural laws and guiding case law related to reasons for a supreme court to overrule its universally binding legal opinions with a particular emphasis on relevant Ukrainian legal context as a perfectly illustrative example. This research purpose prompts the reliance on a set of appropriate scientific methods of descriptive and comparative law research including the comparative analysis itself as a fundamental instrument for review of relevant legal material, as well as the structural, analytical and law-in-context scientific methods. The paper covers, in particular, a)Ukrainian statutory framework and case law regulating of the Supreme Court of Ukraine's departure from its legal opinions; b)concepts of overrulingprecedents of the highest courts of the most developed countries with common law legal system; c)current views of scientific community and prospects of development of the relevant case lawon Supreme Court of Ukraineoverruling its legal opinions.The authors maintain that it is extremely important to substantiate compelling reasons for a supreme court to review its vision of the correct application of the Law, exposing the reasons for considering the previous one defective, to the extent that it leads tofundamental negative consequences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42302,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de la Universidad del Zulia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de la Universidad del Zulia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46925//rdluz.41.34\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de la Universidad del Zulia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46925//rdluz.41.34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文件旨在就最高法院驳回其具有普遍约束力的法律意见的理由提出改进程序法和指导判例法的建议,并特别强调有关的乌克兰法律背景,作为一个完美的说明性例子。这一研究目的促使我们依赖一套适当的描述性和比较法研究的科学方法,包括将比较分析本身作为审查相关法律材料的基本工具,以及结构、分析和法律语境科学方法。该文件特别涵盖了a)乌克兰的法定框架和规范乌克兰最高法院偏离其法律意见的判例法;B)推翻普通法制度下最发达国家最高法院判例的概念;c)科学界的当前观点和乌克兰最高法院推翻其法律意见的相关案件的发展前景。作者认为,极为重要的是要证明令人信服的理由,以便最高法院审查其对正确适用《法律》的看法,暴露出认为前一个观点有缺陷的理由,因为它会导致根本的负面后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prerequisites for a Supreme Court to Overrule its Binding Legal Opinions
The paper aims at developing recommendations for improving procedural laws and guiding case law related to reasons for a supreme court to overrule its universally binding legal opinions with a particular emphasis on relevant Ukrainian legal context as a perfectly illustrative example. This research purpose prompts the reliance on a set of appropriate scientific methods of descriptive and comparative law research including the comparative analysis itself as a fundamental instrument for review of relevant legal material, as well as the structural, analytical and law-in-context scientific methods. The paper covers, in particular, a)Ukrainian statutory framework and case law regulating of the Supreme Court of Ukraine's departure from its legal opinions; b)concepts of overrulingprecedents of the highest courts of the most developed countries with common law legal system; c)current views of scientific community and prospects of development of the relevant case lawon Supreme Court of Ukraineoverruling its legal opinions.The authors maintain that it is extremely important to substantiate compelling reasons for a supreme court to review its vision of the correct application of the Law, exposing the reasons for considering the previous one defective, to the extent that it leads tofundamental negative consequences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista de la Universidad del Zulia
Revista de la Universidad del Zulia SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
74
期刊最新文献
The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Physical Activity and Quality of Life Among Ukrainian Students El cambio climático también afecta al bienestar educativo. Consecuencias para la Educación Superior The Use of Cloud Technologies in the Professional Training of Future Doctors The Impact of Smart Technologies on the Medicine 4.0 Transformation in the Context of the Technological Revolution Evaluación de la calidad del agua: Caso río Copueno en Ecuador
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1