ORC-Q

IF 0.6 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Diagnostica Pub Date : 2023-09-18 DOI:10.1026/0012-1924/a000324
Hendrik Gräfe, Simone Kauffeld
{"title":"ORC-Q","authors":"Hendrik Gräfe, Simone Kauffeld","doi":"10.1026/0012-1924/a000324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Organizational changes as a method for ensuring competitiveness are an integral part of an organization’s daily life. A comprehensive understanding of organizational readiness for change is essential for managing change successfully and in a goal-oriented manner. Yet, established measures for mapping organizational readiness for change are often based on a unidimensional construct definition. Therefore, the goal of this study was to construct and validate a measure of a well-defined organizational readiness for change construct. Based on a systematic development process, the measure was constructed and tested in two samples for its psychometric properties and validity. A five-factor structure aligned with theoretical assumptions was identified that enabled the interpretation of the factors Organizational Valence, Individual Valence, Positive Affect, Negative Affect, and Change Behavior, which in turn constitute a second-order factor Organizational Readiness for Change. Further results indicated satisfactory values for the reliability of the measure as well as its convergent, discriminant, criterion, and construct validity. Implications and limitations are discussed and the outlook for potential future research questions is given.","PeriodicalId":11293,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ORC-Q\",\"authors\":\"Hendrik Gräfe, Simone Kauffeld\",\"doi\":\"10.1026/0012-1924/a000324\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: Organizational changes as a method for ensuring competitiveness are an integral part of an organization’s daily life. A comprehensive understanding of organizational readiness for change is essential for managing change successfully and in a goal-oriented manner. Yet, established measures for mapping organizational readiness for change are often based on a unidimensional construct definition. Therefore, the goal of this study was to construct and validate a measure of a well-defined organizational readiness for change construct. Based on a systematic development process, the measure was constructed and tested in two samples for its psychometric properties and validity. A five-factor structure aligned with theoretical assumptions was identified that enabled the interpretation of the factors Organizational Valence, Individual Valence, Positive Affect, Negative Affect, and Change Behavior, which in turn constitute a second-order factor Organizational Readiness for Change. Further results indicated satisfactory values for the reliability of the measure as well as its convergent, discriminant, criterion, and construct validity. Implications and limitations are discussed and the outlook for potential future research questions is given.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11293,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a000324\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a000324","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:组织变革作为一种确保竞争力的方法,是组织日常生活中不可或缺的一部分。对组织变革准备的全面理解对于以目标导向的方式成功地管理变革是必不可少的。然而,为映射组织对变更的准备情况而建立的度量通常是基于一维构造定义的。因此,本研究的目标是构建并验证定义良好的组织变更准备构造的度量。基于系统的开发过程,构建了该量表,并在两个样本中对其心理测量特性和有效性进行了测试。在理论假设的基础上,确定了组织效价、个体效价、积极情感、消极情感和变革行为的五因子结构,这些因子构成了组织变革准备的二级因子。进一步的结果表明,该测量的信度及其收敛效度、判别效度、判据效度和构念效度都令人满意。讨论了影响和局限性,并对潜在的未来研究问题进行了展望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ORC-Q
Abstract: Organizational changes as a method for ensuring competitiveness are an integral part of an organization’s daily life. A comprehensive understanding of organizational readiness for change is essential for managing change successfully and in a goal-oriented manner. Yet, established measures for mapping organizational readiness for change are often based on a unidimensional construct definition. Therefore, the goal of this study was to construct and validate a measure of a well-defined organizational readiness for change construct. Based on a systematic development process, the measure was constructed and tested in two samples for its psychometric properties and validity. A five-factor structure aligned with theoretical assumptions was identified that enabled the interpretation of the factors Organizational Valence, Individual Valence, Positive Affect, Negative Affect, and Change Behavior, which in turn constitute a second-order factor Organizational Readiness for Change. Further results indicated satisfactory values for the reliability of the measure as well as its convergent, discriminant, criterion, and construct validity. Implications and limitations are discussed and the outlook for potential future research questions is given.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnostica
Diagnostica PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Validierung des Onlinefragebogens zur sozialen Akzeptanz von Eltern und Lehrkräften gegenüber Künstlicher Intelligenz in der Schule (SAELKIS) und Überprüfung der Faktorstruktur Validierung einer deutschen Übersetzung der Academic Motivation Scale Konstruktion und explorative Analysen zur Güte des Inventars zur Erfassung von Achtsamkeit bei Jugendlichen Was misst der Wahl-O-Mat Das Konfidenz- / Signifikanzniveau impliziert ein bestimmtes Kostenverhältnis zwischen Fehler 1. Art und Fehler 2. Art
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1