通过文献计量分析发现有利于组织创新文化实施和发展的研究方向

Q3 Social Sciences Innovar Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.15446/innovar.v33n89.107049
Lourdes Pineda-Celaya, María Paz Andrés Reina, Manuel González Pérez
{"title":"通过文献计量分析发现有利于组织创新文化实施和发展的研究方向","authors":"Lourdes Pineda-Celaya, María Paz Andrés Reina, Manuel González Pérez","doi":"10.15446/innovar.v33n89.107049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyzes the lines of research derived from the implementation and development of the organizational culture of innovation in order to identify the trends followed within this field of study. In doing so, we identified potential and recent-interest trends that could contribute both to the development of this scientific field and to the search of companies for competitive advantages. The most productive authors, journals and countries were also identified, thus offering a solid basis for future research. The methodology consisted of the analysis of bibliometric indicators from scientific articles in Scopus database published between 1980 and 2000. The Web of Science was not considered since the results obtained in both databases were similar. Among the relevant findings related to administration, in publishing terms, the United States is the most productive country, followed by the United Kingdom and Australia. The analysis of topological data between keywords and science areas shows that the analyzed sample focuses on inter- and multidisciplinary studies, and that most theories and basic frameworks were created between 1980 and 2000. These findings provide a basic framework for qualitative and quantitative research that could be applied by experts in the field of management.","PeriodicalId":40012,"journal":{"name":"Innovar","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detection of the Lines of Research in Favor of the Implementation and Development of Organizational Culture of Innovation through a Bibliometric Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Lourdes Pineda-Celaya, María Paz Andrés Reina, Manuel González Pérez\",\"doi\":\"10.15446/innovar.v33n89.107049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper analyzes the lines of research derived from the implementation and development of the organizational culture of innovation in order to identify the trends followed within this field of study. In doing so, we identified potential and recent-interest trends that could contribute both to the development of this scientific field and to the search of companies for competitive advantages. The most productive authors, journals and countries were also identified, thus offering a solid basis for future research. The methodology consisted of the analysis of bibliometric indicators from scientific articles in Scopus database published between 1980 and 2000. The Web of Science was not considered since the results obtained in both databases were similar. Among the relevant findings related to administration, in publishing terms, the United States is the most productive country, followed by the United Kingdom and Australia. The analysis of topological data between keywords and science areas shows that the analyzed sample focuses on inter- and multidisciplinary studies, and that most theories and basic frameworks were created between 1980 and 2000. These findings provide a basic framework for qualitative and quantitative research that could be applied by experts in the field of management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovar\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovar\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v33n89.107049\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v33n89.107049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了组织创新文化的实施和发展的研究思路,以确定这一研究领域的趋势。在这样做的过程中,我们确定了潜在的和最近的兴趣趋势,这些趋势既有助于这一科学领域的发展,也有助于寻找公司的竞争优势。还确定了最高产的作者、期刊和国家,从而为未来的研究提供了坚实的基础。该方法包括对1980年至2000年间发表的Scopus数据库中的科学论文的文献计量指标进行分析。由于在两个数据库中获得的结果相似,因此没有考虑Web of Science。在与行政管理有关的调查结果中,从出版的角度来看,美国是生产力最高的国家,其次是英国和澳大利亚。关键词与科学领域之间的拓扑数据分析表明,所分析的样本集中于跨学科和多学科研究,大多数理论和基本框架是在1980 - 2000年之间创建的。这些发现为定性和定量研究提供了一个基本框架,可供管理领域的专家应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Detection of the Lines of Research in Favor of the Implementation and Development of Organizational Culture of Innovation through a Bibliometric Analysis
This paper analyzes the lines of research derived from the implementation and development of the organizational culture of innovation in order to identify the trends followed within this field of study. In doing so, we identified potential and recent-interest trends that could contribute both to the development of this scientific field and to the search of companies for competitive advantages. The most productive authors, journals and countries were also identified, thus offering a solid basis for future research. The methodology consisted of the analysis of bibliometric indicators from scientific articles in Scopus database published between 1980 and 2000. The Web of Science was not considered since the results obtained in both databases were similar. Among the relevant findings related to administration, in publishing terms, the United States is the most productive country, followed by the United Kingdom and Australia. The analysis of topological data between keywords and science areas shows that the analyzed sample focuses on inter- and multidisciplinary studies, and that most theories and basic frameworks were created between 1980 and 2000. These findings provide a basic framework for qualitative and quantitative research that could be applied by experts in the field of management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Innovar
Innovar Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊介绍: INNOVAR is a journal that publishes top research in organizations from social sciences and other fields. Its target is composed by professionals and scholars. INNOVAR is indexed in recognized international databases as Scopus. In light of its quality and visibility, in Colombia INNOVAR have the highest category in the National Bibliographic Index of Colombian scientific and technological publications (A1). INNOVAR publishes original works, result of rigorous research, from different approaches in social and management sciences, without biases to certain methodological perspectives.
期刊最新文献
How to Report Systematic Literature Reviews in Management Using SyReMa Caracterización e impacto de los hallazgos contenidos en informes de auditoría aprobados por la Contraloría General del Estado del Ecuador entre los períodos 2016-2019 Intercooperação, (eco)inovação e desempenho: um estudo de caso na Rede de Comercialização Solidária do Tapajós, estado do Pará, Brasil El emprendimiento social: un acercamiento a su medición dentro del contexto mexicano Política tecnológica e innovación. El rol de la dirección de recursos humanos desde una perspectiva dual de proceso y contenido
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1