储蓄和个人预算对理财知识和幸福有何影响

Nataliia Versal, Ihor Honchar, Mariia Balytska, Vasyl Erastov
{"title":"储蓄和个人预算对理财知识和幸福有何影响","authors":"Nataliia Versal, Ihor Honchar, Mariia Balytska, Vasyl Erastov","doi":"10.3846/bmee.2023.19062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – the well-being of individuals plays a vital role in fostering sustainable economic development. The differentiation between subjective and objective well-being in selected EU and selected non-EU countries, with a particular focus on financial literacy, as individuals’ assessments of their own well-being can significantly differ from objective economic indicators, emphasizing the subjective nature of well-being. The research objective is to investigate how savings and personal budgeting indicators affect both objective and subjective well-being and to examine the role of these indicators in promoting financial literacy. Research methodology – the research investigates the impact of savings and personal budgeting indicators on financial literacy (FLI), financial well-being (FWB), and gross domestic product at purchasing power parity per capita (GDP PPP per capita). We applied Pearson’s pairwise correlation between nine indicators of personal budgeting and savings and the method of principal components to identify the reasonable factors according to their statistical significance based on data from 22 countries included in the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development/International Network on Financial Education (OECD/INFE) survey data, Global Findex Database. The application of the Varimax procedure made it possible to identify factor groups of indicators. Findings – we identify two factors for the whole sample and a sample of selected EU-countries; for non-EU-countries were identified three factors. Our research reveals that subjective FWB across all countries and non-EU countries is under the significant influence of factor group 1 mainly represented by savings indicators, with no significance for EU countries. FLI also significantly depends on factor group 1 for the entire sample of countries and across EU and non-EU countries. GDP PPP per capita is under the significant influence of all factors both in the sample of countries and across EU and non-EU countries. Research limitations – FLI databases started to be gathered relatively recently and are not regularly updated. This can cause a situation when data for different countries are provided with time gaps. Moreover, due to the high cost involved, not all countries conduct such research, which hinders the creation of large datasets for more accurate country comparisons. Practical implications – the results of this study may have interest for policymakers since they focus on improvement of the financial literacy and FWB of individuals, that results in a higher level of financial stability. Originality/Value – this research is to address existing gaps in understanding of the interplay between subjective and objective FWB. Also, it proposes a novel approach that views savings as a factor that enhances financial literacy, in contrast to the conventional approach that considers savings as a consequence of improved FWB.","PeriodicalId":34504,"journal":{"name":"Business Management and Economics Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"HOW DO SAVINGS AND PERSONAL BUDGETING MATTER ON FINANCIAL LITERACY AND WELL-BEING\",\"authors\":\"Nataliia Versal, Ihor Honchar, Mariia Balytska, Vasyl Erastov\",\"doi\":\"10.3846/bmee.2023.19062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose – the well-being of individuals plays a vital role in fostering sustainable economic development. The differentiation between subjective and objective well-being in selected EU and selected non-EU countries, with a particular focus on financial literacy, as individuals’ assessments of their own well-being can significantly differ from objective economic indicators, emphasizing the subjective nature of well-being. The research objective is to investigate how savings and personal budgeting indicators affect both objective and subjective well-being and to examine the role of these indicators in promoting financial literacy. Research methodology – the research investigates the impact of savings and personal budgeting indicators on financial literacy (FLI), financial well-being (FWB), and gross domestic product at purchasing power parity per capita (GDP PPP per capita). We applied Pearson’s pairwise correlation between nine indicators of personal budgeting and savings and the method of principal components to identify the reasonable factors according to their statistical significance based on data from 22 countries included in the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development/International Network on Financial Education (OECD/INFE) survey data, Global Findex Database. The application of the Varimax procedure made it possible to identify factor groups of indicators. Findings – we identify two factors for the whole sample and a sample of selected EU-countries; for non-EU-countries were identified three factors. Our research reveals that subjective FWB across all countries and non-EU countries is under the significant influence of factor group 1 mainly represented by savings indicators, with no significance for EU countries. FLI also significantly depends on factor group 1 for the entire sample of countries and across EU and non-EU countries. GDP PPP per capita is under the significant influence of all factors both in the sample of countries and across EU and non-EU countries. Research limitations – FLI databases started to be gathered relatively recently and are not regularly updated. This can cause a situation when data for different countries are provided with time gaps. Moreover, due to the high cost involved, not all countries conduct such research, which hinders the creation of large datasets for more accurate country comparisons. Practical implications – the results of this study may have interest for policymakers since they focus on improvement of the financial literacy and FWB of individuals, that results in a higher level of financial stability. Originality/Value – this research is to address existing gaps in understanding of the interplay between subjective and objective FWB. Also, it proposes a novel approach that views savings as a factor that enhances financial literacy, in contrast to the conventional approach that considers savings as a consequence of improved FWB.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Business Management and Economics Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Business Management and Economics Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3846/bmee.2023.19062\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Management and Economics Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3846/bmee.2023.19062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的-个人的福祉在促进可持续经济发展方面起着至关重要的作用。在选定的欧盟和选定的非欧盟国家中,主观和客观福祉之间的差异,特别关注金融素养,因为个人对自己福祉的评估可能与客观经济指标显著不同,强调了福祉的主观性。研究目的是调查储蓄和个人预算指标如何影响客观和主观幸福感,并检查这些指标在促进金融素养方面的作用。研究方法-该研究调查了储蓄和个人预算指标对金融素养(FLI)、财务福利(FWB)和人均购买力平价国内生产总值(GDP PPP)的影响。我们基于经济合作与发展组织/国际金融教育网络(OECD/INFE)调查数据和全球金融指数数据库中的22个国家的数据,应用个人预算和储蓄9个指标之间的Pearson两两相关和主成分法,根据其统计显著性来确定合理因素。应用Varimax程序可以确定指标的因素组。研究结果-我们确定了整个样本和选定的欧盟国家样本的两个因素;对非欧盟国家的影响确定了三个因素。我们的研究表明,所有国家和非欧盟国家的主观FWB都受到以储蓄指标为主要代表的因子组1的显著影响,而欧盟国家的主观FWB不显著。对于整个国家样本以及欧盟和非欧盟国家,FLI也显著依赖于因子组1。无论是在国家样本中,还是在欧盟和非欧盟国家中,人均GDP PPP都受到所有因素的显著影响。研究限制- FLI数据库是最近才开始收集的,并没有定期更新。这可能导致不同国家的数据有时间差的情况。此外,由于所涉及的高成本,并非所有国家都进行此类研究,这阻碍了创建更准确的国家比较的大型数据集。实际意义——这项研究的结果可能会引起政策制定者的兴趣,因为他们关注的是提高个人的金融素养和FWB,从而提高金融稳定性。原创性/价值——这项研究是为了解决在理解主观和客观FWB之间相互作用方面存在的差距。此外,它提出了一种新颖的方法,将储蓄视为提高金融知识的一个因素,而不是将储蓄视为改善FWB的结果的传统方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
HOW DO SAVINGS AND PERSONAL BUDGETING MATTER ON FINANCIAL LITERACY AND WELL-BEING
Purpose – the well-being of individuals plays a vital role in fostering sustainable economic development. The differentiation between subjective and objective well-being in selected EU and selected non-EU countries, with a particular focus on financial literacy, as individuals’ assessments of their own well-being can significantly differ from objective economic indicators, emphasizing the subjective nature of well-being. The research objective is to investigate how savings and personal budgeting indicators affect both objective and subjective well-being and to examine the role of these indicators in promoting financial literacy. Research methodology – the research investigates the impact of savings and personal budgeting indicators on financial literacy (FLI), financial well-being (FWB), and gross domestic product at purchasing power parity per capita (GDP PPP per capita). We applied Pearson’s pairwise correlation between nine indicators of personal budgeting and savings and the method of principal components to identify the reasonable factors according to their statistical significance based on data from 22 countries included in the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development/International Network on Financial Education (OECD/INFE) survey data, Global Findex Database. The application of the Varimax procedure made it possible to identify factor groups of indicators. Findings – we identify two factors for the whole sample and a sample of selected EU-countries; for non-EU-countries were identified three factors. Our research reveals that subjective FWB across all countries and non-EU countries is under the significant influence of factor group 1 mainly represented by savings indicators, with no significance for EU countries. FLI also significantly depends on factor group 1 for the entire sample of countries and across EU and non-EU countries. GDP PPP per capita is under the significant influence of all factors both in the sample of countries and across EU and non-EU countries. Research limitations – FLI databases started to be gathered relatively recently and are not regularly updated. This can cause a situation when data for different countries are provided with time gaps. Moreover, due to the high cost involved, not all countries conduct such research, which hinders the creation of large datasets for more accurate country comparisons. Practical implications – the results of this study may have interest for policymakers since they focus on improvement of the financial literacy and FWB of individuals, that results in a higher level of financial stability. Originality/Value – this research is to address existing gaps in understanding of the interplay between subjective and objective FWB. Also, it proposes a novel approach that views savings as a factor that enhances financial literacy, in contrast to the conventional approach that considers savings as a consequence of improved FWB.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
DIGITAL EMPLOYEE EXPERIENCE AND ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE: A STUDY OF THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS SECTOR IN OMAN MBSE-LITE: A FRAMEWORK FOR ADOPTING MODEL-BASED SYSTEMS ENGINEERING IN SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES IN SOUTH AFRICA STUDY OF THE INFLUENCE OF SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT ON TRAFFIC INCIDENTS EXTENDED WARRANTY AND ITS IMPACT ON PERCEPTION IN SALES PROMOTION OF DURABLES HOW DO SAVINGS AND PERSONAL BUDGETING MATTER ON FINANCIAL LITERACY AND WELL-BEING
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1