口腔实验室技术人员的呼吸系统疾病:全科医生问诊率的比较研究。

M E Sheikh, R Guest
{"title":"口腔实验室技术人员的呼吸系统疾病:全科医生问诊率的比较研究。","authors":"M E Sheikh,&nbsp;R Guest","doi":"10.1093/occmed/40.2.68","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Eighteen Royal Air Force dental laboratory technicians (DLTs) and 69 Service controls matched for age, sex and smoking status were compared by means of incidence rates of GP consultation for respiratory, and all other, illness. By retrospectively calculating for each individual the time served (man-years at risk) at the RAF Station concerned, together with the number of consultations that fell into each of the study categories, it was possible to produce an incidence rate, per man-year at risk, of consultations for both study and control groups. By calculating a relative risk (RR) it was observed that DLTs were nearly three times (RR = 2.95. CI 1.69-5.13), more likely to attend their GP with respiratory problems than members of the control group, and 1.7 times (RR = 1.71. CI 0.98-3.01) more likely to attend their GP with other problems. Comparison of the numbers of individuals continuing to use bronchodilator therapy in each of the two groups suggested that DLTs have a higher prevalence of conditions that require this form of therapy as treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":76684,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Society of Occupational Medicine","volume":"40 2","pages":"68-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/occmed/40.2.68","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Respiratory ill-health in dental laboratory technicians: a comparative study of GP consultation rates.\",\"authors\":\"M E Sheikh,&nbsp;R Guest\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/occmed/40.2.68\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Eighteen Royal Air Force dental laboratory technicians (DLTs) and 69 Service controls matched for age, sex and smoking status were compared by means of incidence rates of GP consultation for respiratory, and all other, illness. By retrospectively calculating for each individual the time served (man-years at risk) at the RAF Station concerned, together with the number of consultations that fell into each of the study categories, it was possible to produce an incidence rate, per man-year at risk, of consultations for both study and control groups. By calculating a relative risk (RR) it was observed that DLTs were nearly three times (RR = 2.95. CI 1.69-5.13), more likely to attend their GP with respiratory problems than members of the control group, and 1.7 times (RR = 1.71. CI 0.98-3.01) more likely to attend their GP with other problems. Comparison of the numbers of individuals continuing to use bronchodilator therapy in each of the two groups suggested that DLTs have a higher prevalence of conditions that require this form of therapy as treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of the Society of Occupational Medicine\",\"volume\":\"40 2\",\"pages\":\"68-70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/occmed/40.2.68\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of the Society of Occupational Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/40.2.68\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Society of Occupational Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/40.2.68","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

18名皇家空军牙科实验室技术人员(dlt)和69名符合年龄、性别和吸烟状况的服务控制者通过全科医生对呼吸系统疾病和所有其他疾病的咨询发生率进行了比较。通过回顾性计算每个人在有关的皇家空军基地的服务时间(有风险的人年),以及属于每个研究类别的咨询次数,可以得出研究组和对照组的每个有风险的人年的咨询发生率。通过计算相对风险(RR),观察到dlt几乎是3倍(RR = 2.95)。CI 1.69-5.13),比对照组的成员更有可能因呼吸问题去看全科医生,是对照组的1.7倍(RR = 1.71)。CI 0.98-3.01)更有可能因其他问题去看全科医生。比较两组继续使用支气管扩张剂治疗的个体数量表明,dlt有更高的患病率需要这种形式的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Respiratory ill-health in dental laboratory technicians: a comparative study of GP consultation rates.

Eighteen Royal Air Force dental laboratory technicians (DLTs) and 69 Service controls matched for age, sex and smoking status were compared by means of incidence rates of GP consultation for respiratory, and all other, illness. By retrospectively calculating for each individual the time served (man-years at risk) at the RAF Station concerned, together with the number of consultations that fell into each of the study categories, it was possible to produce an incidence rate, per man-year at risk, of consultations for both study and control groups. By calculating a relative risk (RR) it was observed that DLTs were nearly three times (RR = 2.95. CI 1.69-5.13), more likely to attend their GP with respiratory problems than members of the control group, and 1.7 times (RR = 1.71. CI 0.98-3.01) more likely to attend their GP with other problems. Comparison of the numbers of individuals continuing to use bronchodilator therapy in each of the two groups suggested that DLTs have a higher prevalence of conditions that require this form of therapy as treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Disabled people and jobs. The occupational physician. Occupational health and hygiene following a fire in a warehouse with an asbestos cement roof. Economic indicators and involvement of health professionals at worksite health services in a developing country. Absence and labour turnover in a foundry attributable to respiratory disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1