审美上不认同自己是他者

Uku Tooming
{"title":"审美上不认同自己是他者","authors":"Uku Tooming","doi":"10.33134/eeja.369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Can disagreement with my past self about aesthetic matters give a reason to reconsider my present aesthetic verdict and if it does, under what conditions? In other words, can such a disagreement be a sign of my failing in my present aesthetic judgement? In this paper, I argue that revising one’s judgement in response to disagreeing with one’s former self is appropriate but only when the former and the present self share the same aesthetic personality. The possibility of failure in one’s aesthetic judgement is therefore bound up, among other things, with facts about one’s aesthetic identity over time. The resulting view has implications for our understanding of the scope of the autonomy in aesthetics and is consistent with empirical evidence regarding the way in which people evaluate aesthetic judgments.","PeriodicalId":53570,"journal":{"name":"Estetika : The Central European Journal of Aesthetics","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aesthetic Disagreement with Oneself as Another\",\"authors\":\"Uku Tooming\",\"doi\":\"10.33134/eeja.369\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Can disagreement with my past self about aesthetic matters give a reason to reconsider my present aesthetic verdict and if it does, under what conditions? In other words, can such a disagreement be a sign of my failing in my present aesthetic judgement? In this paper, I argue that revising one’s judgement in response to disagreeing with one’s former self is appropriate but only when the former and the present self share the same aesthetic personality. The possibility of failure in one’s aesthetic judgement is therefore bound up, among other things, with facts about one’s aesthetic identity over time. The resulting view has implications for our understanding of the scope of the autonomy in aesthetics and is consistent with empirical evidence regarding the way in which people evaluate aesthetic judgments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Estetika : The Central European Journal of Aesthetics\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Estetika : The Central European Journal of Aesthetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33134/eeja.369\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estetika : The Central European Journal of Aesthetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33134/eeja.369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在审美问题上与过去的自己意见不一致,能不能给我一个理由重新考虑我现在的审美判断?如果可以,在什么条件下?换句话说,这样的分歧会是我目前审美判断失败的标志吗?在本文中,我认为,修正一个人的判断,以回应不同意自己的前自我是适当的,但只有在前自我和现在的自我具有相同的审美人格。因此,一个人的审美判断失败的可能性,除其他外,与一个人随着时间推移的审美认同的事实联系在一起。由此产生的观点对我们理解美学自主性的范围具有启示意义,并且与人们评估审美判断的方式的经验证据一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Aesthetic Disagreement with Oneself as Another
Can disagreement with my past self about aesthetic matters give a reason to reconsider my present aesthetic verdict and if it does, under what conditions? In other words, can such a disagreement be a sign of my failing in my present aesthetic judgement? In this paper, I argue that revising one’s judgement in response to disagreeing with one’s former self is appropriate but only when the former and the present self share the same aesthetic personality. The possibility of failure in one’s aesthetic judgement is therefore bound up, among other things, with facts about one’s aesthetic identity over time. The resulting view has implications for our understanding of the scope of the autonomy in aesthetics and is consistent with empirical evidence regarding the way in which people evaluate aesthetic judgments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Estetika : The Central European Journal of Aesthetics
Estetika : The Central European Journal of Aesthetics Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Emilia Dilke on Aesthetics Aesthetic Engagement and Soundscape: A Case of Convenience Store Woman, a Contemporary Japanese Novel Looking through Images: A Phenomenology of Visual Media by Emmanuel Alloa The Implied Designer of Digital Games Contemporary Art and the Problem of Indiscernibles: An Adverbialist Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1