提克里特急诊医院腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗复杂急性阑尾炎

Thaer J Mohammed, Mohammed S Qadoori, Abdulnaser A Salih
{"title":"提克里特急诊医院腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗复杂急性阑尾炎","authors":"Thaer J Mohammed, Mohammed S Qadoori, Abdulnaser A Salih","doi":"10.33545/surgery.2023.v7.i4b.1031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: With a prevalence of 1.17 cases per 1000 people and an approximate 7 percent risk over the course of a lifetime, acute appendicitis continues to be one of the most common causes of acute abdominal pain Materials and Methods: During the time period of this observational study, which began on January 1, 2022 and ended on November 30, 2022, 57 patients were admitted to the emergency unit of Tikrit General Hospital with a diagnosis of suspected complicated acute appendicitis. Antibiotics and fluids were given intravenously to the patient before the operation. Pneumo-peritoneum was created using either the Verrus needle or the Hasson open approach while the patient was under general anesthesia and intubated with an endotracheal tube. Additionally, the patient was positioned in the supine position. The appendix could be extracted using either the endo-catch bag or the 10 mm port, depending on which method was used. After performing a peritoneal wash with saline until the wash fluid turned clear, an intra-peritoneal tube drain was left either in an appendicular bed or the pelvis. Results: The study enrolled 57 participants (38 females, 19 males) with a mean age of 26.73±6.5 years, ranging from 17 to 50 years. All patients underwent diagnostic laparoscopy, and intra-operative findings showed that 26 patients (45.61%) had perforated appendicitis, 13 patients (22.81%) had gangrenous appendicitis, 11 patients (19.30%) had appendicular abscess, and 7 patients (12.28%) had appendicular mass. The mean operation time was 49.5±16.86 minutes, with a range of 39 to 117 minutes. Laparoscopy was the preferred option for 52 patients (91.23%), while 5 patients required open surgery. Hospital stay duration varied, with 13 patients staying for 2 days, 20 patients for 3 days, 17 patients for 4 days, and 4 patients for more than 5 days. During the post-operative follow-up, 43 patients had no complications (75.44%), 2 patients (3.51%) had a fever with a collection on follow-up ultrasound, 5 patients (8.77%) had a fever without a collection, 2 patients (3.51%) had postoperative ileus, and 3 patients (5.26%) had wound seroma or infected seroma.Conclusions: This study shows that laparoscopic appendectomy may treat severe appendicitis safely and effectively. It reduced hospital stays and conversions. Prevents postoperative infections.","PeriodicalId":14421,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Surgery Science","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated acute appendicitis in Tikrit emergency hospital\",\"authors\":\"Thaer J Mohammed, Mohammed S Qadoori, Abdulnaser A Salih\",\"doi\":\"10.33545/surgery.2023.v7.i4b.1031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: With a prevalence of 1.17 cases per 1000 people and an approximate 7 percent risk over the course of a lifetime, acute appendicitis continues to be one of the most common causes of acute abdominal pain Materials and Methods: During the time period of this observational study, which began on January 1, 2022 and ended on November 30, 2022, 57 patients were admitted to the emergency unit of Tikrit General Hospital with a diagnosis of suspected complicated acute appendicitis. Antibiotics and fluids were given intravenously to the patient before the operation. Pneumo-peritoneum was created using either the Verrus needle or the Hasson open approach while the patient was under general anesthesia and intubated with an endotracheal tube. Additionally, the patient was positioned in the supine position. The appendix could be extracted using either the endo-catch bag or the 10 mm port, depending on which method was used. After performing a peritoneal wash with saline until the wash fluid turned clear, an intra-peritoneal tube drain was left either in an appendicular bed or the pelvis. Results: The study enrolled 57 participants (38 females, 19 males) with a mean age of 26.73±6.5 years, ranging from 17 to 50 years. All patients underwent diagnostic laparoscopy, and intra-operative findings showed that 26 patients (45.61%) had perforated appendicitis, 13 patients (22.81%) had gangrenous appendicitis, 11 patients (19.30%) had appendicular abscess, and 7 patients (12.28%) had appendicular mass. The mean operation time was 49.5±16.86 minutes, with a range of 39 to 117 minutes. Laparoscopy was the preferred option for 52 patients (91.23%), while 5 patients required open surgery. Hospital stay duration varied, with 13 patients staying for 2 days, 20 patients for 3 days, 17 patients for 4 days, and 4 patients for more than 5 days. During the post-operative follow-up, 43 patients had no complications (75.44%), 2 patients (3.51%) had a fever with a collection on follow-up ultrasound, 5 patients (8.77%) had a fever without a collection, 2 patients (3.51%) had postoperative ileus, and 3 patients (5.26%) had wound seroma or infected seroma.Conclusions: This study shows that laparoscopic appendectomy may treat severe appendicitis safely and effectively. It reduced hospital stays and conversions. Prevents postoperative infections.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Surgery Science\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Surgery Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33545/surgery.2023.v7.i4b.1031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Surgery Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33545/surgery.2023.v7.i4b.1031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:急性阑尾炎的患病率为每1000人1.17例,一生中风险约为7%,仍然是急性腹痛最常见的原因之一。材料和方法:在这项观察性研究期间,从2022年1月1日开始到2022年11月30日结束,57名患者被提克里特总医院急诊室收治,诊断为疑似并发症急性阑尾炎。手术前给病人静脉注射抗生素和液体。在患者全身麻醉和气管内插管的情况下,使用Verrus针或Hasson开放入路制造腹膜充气。此外,将患者置于仰卧位。根据使用的方法不同,阑尾可采用夹尾袋或10mm口提取。用生理盐水冲洗腹膜,直到洗液变清,在阑尾床或骨盆留下腹膜内引流管。结果:研究共纳入57例受试者,其中女性38例,男性19例,平均年龄26.73±6.5岁,年龄从17岁到50岁不等。所有患者均行诊断性腹腔镜检查,术中表现为阑尾炎穿孔26例(45.61%),坏疽性阑尾炎13例(22.81%),阑尾脓肿11例(19.30%),阑尾肿块7例(12.28%)。平均手术时间49.5±16.86分钟,39 ~ 117分钟。52例(91.23%)患者首选腹腔镜,5例需要开腹手术。住院时间各不相同,2天13例,3天20例,4天17例,5天以上4例。术后随访中,无并发症43例(75.44%),随访超声有发热采集2例(3.51%),有发热未采集5例(8.77%),术后肠梗肠炎2例(3.51%),创面血肿或感染性血肿3例(5.26%)。结论:腹腔镜阑尾切除术可以安全有效地治疗重症阑尾炎。它减少了住院时间和转换。防止术后感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated acute appendicitis in Tikrit emergency hospital
Background: With a prevalence of 1.17 cases per 1000 people and an approximate 7 percent risk over the course of a lifetime, acute appendicitis continues to be one of the most common causes of acute abdominal pain Materials and Methods: During the time period of this observational study, which began on January 1, 2022 and ended on November 30, 2022, 57 patients were admitted to the emergency unit of Tikrit General Hospital with a diagnosis of suspected complicated acute appendicitis. Antibiotics and fluids were given intravenously to the patient before the operation. Pneumo-peritoneum was created using either the Verrus needle or the Hasson open approach while the patient was under general anesthesia and intubated with an endotracheal tube. Additionally, the patient was positioned in the supine position. The appendix could be extracted using either the endo-catch bag or the 10 mm port, depending on which method was used. After performing a peritoneal wash with saline until the wash fluid turned clear, an intra-peritoneal tube drain was left either in an appendicular bed or the pelvis. Results: The study enrolled 57 participants (38 females, 19 males) with a mean age of 26.73±6.5 years, ranging from 17 to 50 years. All patients underwent diagnostic laparoscopy, and intra-operative findings showed that 26 patients (45.61%) had perforated appendicitis, 13 patients (22.81%) had gangrenous appendicitis, 11 patients (19.30%) had appendicular abscess, and 7 patients (12.28%) had appendicular mass. The mean operation time was 49.5±16.86 minutes, with a range of 39 to 117 minutes. Laparoscopy was the preferred option for 52 patients (91.23%), while 5 patients required open surgery. Hospital stay duration varied, with 13 patients staying for 2 days, 20 patients for 3 days, 17 patients for 4 days, and 4 patients for more than 5 days. During the post-operative follow-up, 43 patients had no complications (75.44%), 2 patients (3.51%) had a fever with a collection on follow-up ultrasound, 5 patients (8.77%) had a fever without a collection, 2 patients (3.51%) had postoperative ileus, and 3 patients (5.26%) had wound seroma or infected seroma.Conclusions: This study shows that laparoscopic appendectomy may treat severe appendicitis safely and effectively. It reduced hospital stays and conversions. Prevents postoperative infections.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison between FNAC and TRU cut biopsy in patients with breast lump Clinical study of mesh repair in Sventral hernia with co-morbidities (diabetes mellitus and/or obesity) in a Tertiary care hospital A comparative study of inguinal hernia repair by open versus laparoscopic technique in paediatric age group Liga Clips vs Bipolar Diathermy for cystic artery sealing in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A comparative study A comparative study on primary hypospadias repair using dartos fascia flap versus tunica vaginalis flap in paediatric age group
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1