辅导员的关怀方式如何激发和深化职前教师对其教学实践的反思?一项为期一年的行动研究

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Reflective Practice Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1080/14623943.2023.2264213
Eugénia Lopes Azevedo, Carla Sofia Valério Fernandes, Rui Manuel Flores Araújo, Ana Gracinda Alves Ramos, Isabel Maria Ribeiro Mesquita
{"title":"辅导员的关怀方式如何激发和深化职前教师对其教学实践的反思?一项为期一年的行动研究","authors":"Eugénia Lopes Azevedo, Carla Sofia Valério Fernandes, Rui Manuel Flores Araújo, Ana Gracinda Alves Ramos, Isabel Maria Ribeiro Mesquita","doi":"10.1080/14623943.2023.2264213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThroughout a year-long Action Research (AR) conducted in Physical Education Teacher Education, this study explored how a facilitator’s caring approach can help develop strategies and create circumstances to enhance and deepen Pre-Service Teachers’ (PSTs) reflection on their pedagogical practice. Participants included six PSTs and the first author, who assumed the dual role of external facilitator (EF) and researcher. Three action research-cycles were conducted, enabling the EF to analyze the needs and thoughts of PSTs thoroughly. This allowed EF to tailor her interventions to developed strategies and created circumstances that triggered and deepened the PSTs’ reflection. Qualitative data collected through focus group interviews, informal interviews, reflective journals, and field notes guided the EF’s strategic progression in each AR-cycle through thematic analysis to design subsequent interventions. Through the ongoing AR-cycles, the facilitator underwent a strategic evolution propelled by PSTs’ needs and thoughts. Specifically, PSTs’ reflections transitioned from conformity to autonomy, which embraced multifaceted analysis, transcending consensus. It is recommended that Physical Education Teacher Education programs incorporate a customized caring environment that nurtures vulnerability, fosters the development of trusting relationships, and is responsive to the unique learning context.KEYWORDS: Reflective practiceethics of careinitial teacher educationfacilitatoraction research Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT). The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.Notes on contributorsEugénia Lopes AzevedoEugénia Azevedo is a PhD Student in Sport Sciences and is interested in reflective practice in Physical Education Teacher Education, action research, collaborative learning, and sports pedagogy.Carla Sofia Valério FernandesCarla Valerio is a Health and Physical Education lecturer and researcher interested in Physical Education Teacher Education, teacher professional learning, social learning theory, and student-centred approaches.Rui Manuel Flores AraújoRui Araújo is a Lecture and the Course leader of the Physical Education Teacher Education programme at University of Maia. Integrated researcher at the Research Centre in Sports Sciences, Health Sciences and Human Development and Research on Sport Pedagogy. More than 10 years of teaching experience in higher education.Ana Gracinda Alves RamosAna Ramos is a Lecturer at Faculty of Sport, University of Porto and member of Centre of Research, Education, Innovation, and Intervention in Sport (CIFI2D) interested in the area of Sports Sciences, her research interests are related to the topic of Sports Training, Sports Pedagogy, Didactics, Learning, Action-Research, and Long-term Athlete Development.Isabel Maria Ribeiro MesquitaIsabel Mesquita is a Full Professor at Faculty of Sport, University of Porto and member of Centre of Research, Education, Innovation, and Intervention in Sport (CIFI2D) interested in in the area of Sports Sciences, Sports Training, Sports Pedagogy, Didactics, Learning, Action-Research.","PeriodicalId":51594,"journal":{"name":"Reflective Practice","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How can a facilitator’s caring approach trigger and deepen pre-service teachers’ reflection on their pedagogical practice? A year-long action research study\",\"authors\":\"Eugénia Lopes Azevedo, Carla Sofia Valério Fernandes, Rui Manuel Flores Araújo, Ana Gracinda Alves Ramos, Isabel Maria Ribeiro Mesquita\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14623943.2023.2264213\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTThroughout a year-long Action Research (AR) conducted in Physical Education Teacher Education, this study explored how a facilitator’s caring approach can help develop strategies and create circumstances to enhance and deepen Pre-Service Teachers’ (PSTs) reflection on their pedagogical practice. Participants included six PSTs and the first author, who assumed the dual role of external facilitator (EF) and researcher. Three action research-cycles were conducted, enabling the EF to analyze the needs and thoughts of PSTs thoroughly. This allowed EF to tailor her interventions to developed strategies and created circumstances that triggered and deepened the PSTs’ reflection. Qualitative data collected through focus group interviews, informal interviews, reflective journals, and field notes guided the EF’s strategic progression in each AR-cycle through thematic analysis to design subsequent interventions. Through the ongoing AR-cycles, the facilitator underwent a strategic evolution propelled by PSTs’ needs and thoughts. Specifically, PSTs’ reflections transitioned from conformity to autonomy, which embraced multifaceted analysis, transcending consensus. It is recommended that Physical Education Teacher Education programs incorporate a customized caring environment that nurtures vulnerability, fosters the development of trusting relationships, and is responsive to the unique learning context.KEYWORDS: Reflective practiceethics of careinitial teacher educationfacilitatoraction research Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT). The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.Notes on contributorsEugénia Lopes AzevedoEugénia Azevedo is a PhD Student in Sport Sciences and is interested in reflective practice in Physical Education Teacher Education, action research, collaborative learning, and sports pedagogy.Carla Sofia Valério FernandesCarla Valerio is a Health and Physical Education lecturer and researcher interested in Physical Education Teacher Education, teacher professional learning, social learning theory, and student-centred approaches.Rui Manuel Flores AraújoRui Araújo is a Lecture and the Course leader of the Physical Education Teacher Education programme at University of Maia. Integrated researcher at the Research Centre in Sports Sciences, Health Sciences and Human Development and Research on Sport Pedagogy. More than 10 years of teaching experience in higher education.Ana Gracinda Alves RamosAna Ramos is a Lecturer at Faculty of Sport, University of Porto and member of Centre of Research, Education, Innovation, and Intervention in Sport (CIFI2D) interested in the area of Sports Sciences, her research interests are related to the topic of Sports Training, Sports Pedagogy, Didactics, Learning, Action-Research, and Long-term Athlete Development.Isabel Maria Ribeiro MesquitaIsabel Mesquita is a Full Professor at Faculty of Sport, University of Porto and member of Centre of Research, Education, Innovation, and Intervention in Sport (CIFI2D) interested in in the area of Sports Sciences, Sports Training, Sports Pedagogy, Didactics, Learning, Action-Research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reflective Practice\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reflective Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2023.2264213\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reflective Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2023.2264213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要通过对体育教师教育进行为期一年的行动研究(AR),本研究探讨了辅导员的关怀方法如何帮助制定策略和创造环境,以增强和深化职前教师对其教学实践的反思。参与者包括6名pst和第一作者,他们承担了外部促进者(EF)和研究员的双重角色。进行了三个行动研究周期,使EF能够彻底分析pst的需求和想法。这使得英孚能够根据已制定的策略调整其干预措施,并创造触发和深化pst反思的环境。通过焦点小组访谈、非正式访谈、反思性期刊和实地记录收集的定性数据,通过专题分析设计后续干预措施,指导EF在每个ar周期中的战略进展。通过正在进行的ar周期,推动者经历了由PSTs的需求和思想推动的战略演变。具体来说,pst的反思从从众到自主的转变,包含了多方面的分析,超越了共识。建议体育教师教育项目包含一个定制的关怀环境,培养脆弱性,促进信任关系的发展,并对独特的学习环境做出反应。关键词:反思实践;护理伦理;初级教师教育;本研究由葡萄牙科学技术基金会(FCT)资助。作者无利益冲突需要声明。尤格·阿泽维多是体育科学专业的博士生,对体育教师教育、行动研究、合作学习和体育教育学的反思实践感兴趣。Carla Valerio是一名健康与体育讲师和研究员,对体育教师教育、教师专业学习、社会学习理论和以学生为中心的方法感兴趣。鲁伊·曼努埃尔·弗洛雷斯AraújoRui Araújo是马亚大学体育教师教育项目的讲师和课程负责人。体育科学、健康科学和人类发展研究中心以及体育教育学研究中心的综合研究员。10年以上高等教育教学经验。Ana Gracinda Alves RamosAna Ramos是波尔图大学体育学院的讲师,也是体育研究、教育、创新和干预中心(CIFI2D)的成员,对体育科学领域感兴趣,她的研究兴趣与体育训练、体育教学法、教学、学习、行动研究和长期运动员发展的主题有关。Isabel Maria Ribeiro Mesquita是波尔图大学体育学院的全职教授,也是体育研究、教育、创新和干预中心(CIFI2D)的成员,研究领域包括体育科学、体育训练、体育教育学、教学、学习和行动研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How can a facilitator’s caring approach trigger and deepen pre-service teachers’ reflection on their pedagogical practice? A year-long action research study
ABSTRACTThroughout a year-long Action Research (AR) conducted in Physical Education Teacher Education, this study explored how a facilitator’s caring approach can help develop strategies and create circumstances to enhance and deepen Pre-Service Teachers’ (PSTs) reflection on their pedagogical practice. Participants included six PSTs and the first author, who assumed the dual role of external facilitator (EF) and researcher. Three action research-cycles were conducted, enabling the EF to analyze the needs and thoughts of PSTs thoroughly. This allowed EF to tailor her interventions to developed strategies and created circumstances that triggered and deepened the PSTs’ reflection. Qualitative data collected through focus group interviews, informal interviews, reflective journals, and field notes guided the EF’s strategic progression in each AR-cycle through thematic analysis to design subsequent interventions. Through the ongoing AR-cycles, the facilitator underwent a strategic evolution propelled by PSTs’ needs and thoughts. Specifically, PSTs’ reflections transitioned from conformity to autonomy, which embraced multifaceted analysis, transcending consensus. It is recommended that Physical Education Teacher Education programs incorporate a customized caring environment that nurtures vulnerability, fosters the development of trusting relationships, and is responsive to the unique learning context.KEYWORDS: Reflective practiceethics of careinitial teacher educationfacilitatoraction research Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT). The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.Notes on contributorsEugénia Lopes AzevedoEugénia Azevedo is a PhD Student in Sport Sciences and is interested in reflective practice in Physical Education Teacher Education, action research, collaborative learning, and sports pedagogy.Carla Sofia Valério FernandesCarla Valerio is a Health and Physical Education lecturer and researcher interested in Physical Education Teacher Education, teacher professional learning, social learning theory, and student-centred approaches.Rui Manuel Flores AraújoRui Araújo is a Lecture and the Course leader of the Physical Education Teacher Education programme at University of Maia. Integrated researcher at the Research Centre in Sports Sciences, Health Sciences and Human Development and Research on Sport Pedagogy. More than 10 years of teaching experience in higher education.Ana Gracinda Alves RamosAna Ramos is a Lecturer at Faculty of Sport, University of Porto and member of Centre of Research, Education, Innovation, and Intervention in Sport (CIFI2D) interested in the area of Sports Sciences, her research interests are related to the topic of Sports Training, Sports Pedagogy, Didactics, Learning, Action-Research, and Long-term Athlete Development.Isabel Maria Ribeiro MesquitaIsabel Mesquita is a Full Professor at Faculty of Sport, University of Porto and member of Centre of Research, Education, Innovation, and Intervention in Sport (CIFI2D) interested in in the area of Sports Sciences, Sports Training, Sports Pedagogy, Didactics, Learning, Action-Research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reflective Practice
Reflective Practice EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
Doing cross-cultural interviews from Vietnamese students’ experience and reflective practice: lessons on intercultural communicative competence Reflection tools – support for patient learning in group education What does inclusion look like within an experiential teaching and assessing reflective learning model? Utilising authentic assessment to foster shared social membership Investigating the development of peer-led asynchronous digitally mediated feedback in higher education: three case studies On the journey from cognizance toward thriving: Iranian EFL teachers’ engagement in reflective practice and professional development: the mediating effect of teacher mindfulness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1