受托人决策的正当目的:宏景私人信托有限公司诉黄文永[2022]

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW Trusts & Trustees Pub Date : 2023-02-16 DOI:10.1093/tandt/ttad005
William Moppett
{"title":"受托人决策的正当目的:宏景私人信托有限公司诉黄文永[2022]","authors":"William Moppett","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttad005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In Grand View Private Trust Co Ltd v Wen-Young Wong [2022] UKPC 47, the Privy Council considered the proper approach to reviewing a Bermudan discretionary trustee’s exercise of a power to add and exclude objects where it was alleged that the power was exercised for an improper purpose. The Privy Council analysed the relevance to this inquiry of the trust’s overarching purpose, and considered the recently-prominent question of the existence of a so-called ‘substratum rule’. The decision is an important contribution to the ongoing conversation in the law of trusts and other fiduciaries regarding the review of powers for improper purposes.","PeriodicalId":43396,"journal":{"name":"Trusts & Trustees","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proper Purposes in Trustee Decision-Making: <i>Grand View Private Trust Co Ltd v Wen-Young Wong</i> [2022] UKPC 47\",\"authors\":\"William Moppett\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/tandt/ttad005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In Grand View Private Trust Co Ltd v Wen-Young Wong [2022] UKPC 47, the Privy Council considered the proper approach to reviewing a Bermudan discretionary trustee’s exercise of a power to add and exclude objects where it was alleged that the power was exercised for an improper purpose. The Privy Council analysed the relevance to this inquiry of the trust’s overarching purpose, and considered the recently-prominent question of the existence of a so-called ‘substratum rule’. The decision is an important contribution to the ongoing conversation in the law of trusts and other fiduciaries regarding the review of powers for improper purposes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trusts & Trustees\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trusts & Trustees\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttad005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trusts & Trustees","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttad005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要在Grand View Private Trust Co Ltd诉Wen-Young Wong [2022] UKPC 47案中,枢密院考虑了审查百慕大全权委托受托人在被指控为不正当目的行使权力的情况下行使增加和排除物体的权力的适当方法。枢密院分析了这次调查与信托总体目的的相关性,并考虑了所谓的“底层规则”的存在这一最近突出的问题。这一决定是对信托法和其他受托人正在进行的关于不正当目的的权力审查的讨论的重要贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Proper Purposes in Trustee Decision-Making: Grand View Private Trust Co Ltd v Wen-Young Wong [2022] UKPC 47
Abstract In Grand View Private Trust Co Ltd v Wen-Young Wong [2022] UKPC 47, the Privy Council considered the proper approach to reviewing a Bermudan discretionary trustee’s exercise of a power to add and exclude objects where it was alleged that the power was exercised for an improper purpose. The Privy Council analysed the relevance to this inquiry of the trust’s overarching purpose, and considered the recently-prominent question of the existence of a so-called ‘substratum rule’. The decision is an important contribution to the ongoing conversation in the law of trusts and other fiduciaries regarding the review of powers for improper purposes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
66.70%
发文量
92
期刊最新文献
CC14 guidance update: greener investments, greater uncertainty? Australian tax arrangements for trusts: Section 100A of the Income Tax Assessment Act (1936) Cth Fathers, daughters, and matters of trust In brief An analysis of the risks that arise for discretionary trust settlements in the event of a divorce: to what extent does the Family Court’s asset division approach undermine discretionary trusts?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1