印尼世俗学校与伊斯兰学校:评估英语阅读和听力测试的差异

IF 2.1 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Language Testing in Asia Pub Date : 2023-11-07 DOI:10.1186/s40468-023-00266-w
Abu Nawas, I Gusti Ngurah Darmawan, Nina Maadad
{"title":"印尼世俗学校与伊斯兰学校:评估英语阅读和听力测试的差异","authors":"Abu Nawas, I Gusti Ngurah Darmawan, Nina Maadad","doi":"10.1186/s40468-023-00266-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The greater emphasis on the significance and difference in English performance between the school types has mainly been investigated across Asian countries. However, not much is known about what language skills differentiate their overall language achievement. Using a quantitative study with comparative analysis, this study measured the reading and listening skills of 1319 Indonesian students who were selected using a stratified sample design and grouped them into secular ( Sekolah , n = 726) and Islamic ( Madrasah , n = 593) groups. The samples were selected from 9205 of the total population of secondary school students, in Bone Regency, South Sulawesi Indonesia. The three-way ANOVA results showed a significant difference ( p < 0.05) in reading and listening subskills between the groups. Highly significant results of Madrasah students in reading and listening subskills indicate they are better at constructing what text means in a variety of contexts, as a literary experience in reading texts and obtaining general and specific information from listening tests compared to those attending secular schools. Poor performance of boys and students who enrolled in public secular schools may become the main explanation for achievement gaps across the groups. The main and interaction effects of the school system, sectors, and gender on the tested subskills were also explained in this study. Additionally, the result of the DIF test confirmed that the equity of the tested items between them was supported.","PeriodicalId":37050,"journal":{"name":"Language Testing in Asia","volume":"52 8","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indonesian secular vs. Madrasah schools: assessing the discrepancy in English reading and listening tests\",\"authors\":\"Abu Nawas, I Gusti Ngurah Darmawan, Nina Maadad\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40468-023-00266-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The greater emphasis on the significance and difference in English performance between the school types has mainly been investigated across Asian countries. However, not much is known about what language skills differentiate their overall language achievement. Using a quantitative study with comparative analysis, this study measured the reading and listening skills of 1319 Indonesian students who were selected using a stratified sample design and grouped them into secular ( Sekolah , n = 726) and Islamic ( Madrasah , n = 593) groups. The samples were selected from 9205 of the total population of secondary school students, in Bone Regency, South Sulawesi Indonesia. The three-way ANOVA results showed a significant difference ( p < 0.05) in reading and listening subskills between the groups. Highly significant results of Madrasah students in reading and listening subskills indicate they are better at constructing what text means in a variety of contexts, as a literary experience in reading texts and obtaining general and specific information from listening tests compared to those attending secular schools. Poor performance of boys and students who enrolled in public secular schools may become the main explanation for achievement gaps across the groups. The main and interaction effects of the school system, sectors, and gender on the tested subskills were also explained in this study. Additionally, the result of the DIF test confirmed that the equity of the tested items between them was supported.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language Testing in Asia\",\"volume\":\"52 8\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language Testing in Asia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-023-00266-w\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Testing in Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-023-00266-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对不同学校类型学生英语表现的重要性和差异的研究主要集中在亚洲国家。然而,对于语言技能如何区分他们的整体语言成就,我们知之甚少。本研究采用定量研究与比较分析相结合的方法,对1319名印度尼西亚学生的阅读和听力技能进行了测量,这些学生采用分层抽样设计,并将他们分为世俗(Sekolah, n = 726)和伊斯兰(Madrasah, n = 593)两组。样本选自印度尼西亚南苏拉威西省Bone Regency的9205名中学生。三因素方差分析结果显示差异有统计学意义(p <(0.05)组间阅读和听力子技能差异显著。伊斯兰学校学生在阅读和听力子技能方面的显著成绩表明,与世俗学校的学生相比,他们更善于在各种语境中构建文本的含义,作为阅读文本的文学体验,并从听力测试中获得一般和具体信息。男生和就读于公立世俗学校的学生表现不佳,可能成为各群体之间成绩差距的主要原因。本研究还解释了学校制度、部门和性别对测试子技能的主要影响和交互影响。此外,DIF测试的结果证实了他们之间的测试项目的公平性是支持的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Indonesian secular vs. Madrasah schools: assessing the discrepancy in English reading and listening tests
Abstract The greater emphasis on the significance and difference in English performance between the school types has mainly been investigated across Asian countries. However, not much is known about what language skills differentiate their overall language achievement. Using a quantitative study with comparative analysis, this study measured the reading and listening skills of 1319 Indonesian students who were selected using a stratified sample design and grouped them into secular ( Sekolah , n = 726) and Islamic ( Madrasah , n = 593) groups. The samples were selected from 9205 of the total population of secondary school students, in Bone Regency, South Sulawesi Indonesia. The three-way ANOVA results showed a significant difference ( p < 0.05) in reading and listening subskills between the groups. Highly significant results of Madrasah students in reading and listening subskills indicate they are better at constructing what text means in a variety of contexts, as a literary experience in reading texts and obtaining general and specific information from listening tests compared to those attending secular schools. Poor performance of boys and students who enrolled in public secular schools may become the main explanation for achievement gaps across the groups. The main and interaction effects of the school system, sectors, and gender on the tested subskills were also explained in this study. Additionally, the result of the DIF test confirmed that the equity of the tested items between them was supported.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Language Testing in Asia
Language Testing in Asia Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
28.60%
发文量
50
期刊最新文献
The analysis of marking reliability through the approach of gauge repeatability and reproducibility (GR&R) study: a case of English-speaking test EFL teachers’ cognition of social and psychological consequences of high-stake national language tests: role of teacher training workshops Correction: A review study on discourse-analytical approaches to language testing policy in the South Korean context Indonesian secular vs. Madrasah schools: assessing the discrepancy in English reading and listening tests Correction: Using AI-based detectors to control AI-assisted plagiarism in ESL writing: “The Terminator Versus the Machines”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1