{"title":"《<s:1> rkiye》撤稿科学出版物事后分析","authors":"Fahad AHMED, Yazgı Beriy ALTUN GÜZELDEREN, Şefik YURDAKUL, Parısa POURALI KAHRIZ, Khalıd Mahmood KHAWAR","doi":"10.55517/mrr.1303112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: These days the number of scientific publications is crucial in career advancements and respect in the scientific community. The researchers focus on increasing the number of publications per year, which sometimes compromises the quality of publications. This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of retracted publications with contributions from Turkish authors. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched with a combination of MeSH terms and free words relevant to “retracted publication/s” and “Turkey.” The inclusion criteria were (i) retracted publication and (ii) any authors of the study having affiliation with an institution in Turkey. Bibliographic information of selected publications was extracted. Results: A total of 147 publications were retrieved from three databases. The earliest retracted article was published in 1996, followed by an increasing trend of retracted publications. The study showed 106 (72.1%) articles have full-text Access. Overall 127 scientific journals have published these articles. Scientific Reports and Aesthetic Plastic Surgery were the top journals with four retracted publications. Hacettepe University, was the lead institute, contributing seven publications. The most common reasons for retractions were duplication 50 (34%) and most retracted notices were issued by editor 63 (42.9%). The majority of publications were from Medical Science 93 (63.3% paper) and the highest number, 44 were from surgery and allied. Turkish authors had international collaborations with 20 countries. Conclusion: The number of retracted publications is not high, the trend is increasing. To overcome this, research methodology and research ethics training are crucial.","PeriodicalId":484823,"journal":{"name":"Medical Research Reports","volume":"245 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postmortem of Retracted Scientific Publications from Türkiye\",\"authors\":\"Fahad AHMED, Yazgı Beriy ALTUN GÜZELDEREN, Şefik YURDAKUL, Parısa POURALI KAHRIZ, Khalıd Mahmood KHAWAR\",\"doi\":\"10.55517/mrr.1303112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: These days the number of scientific publications is crucial in career advancements and respect in the scientific community. The researchers focus on increasing the number of publications per year, which sometimes compromises the quality of publications. This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of retracted publications with contributions from Turkish authors. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched with a combination of MeSH terms and free words relevant to “retracted publication/s” and “Turkey.” The inclusion criteria were (i) retracted publication and (ii) any authors of the study having affiliation with an institution in Turkey. Bibliographic information of selected publications was extracted. Results: A total of 147 publications were retrieved from three databases. The earliest retracted article was published in 1996, followed by an increasing trend of retracted publications. The study showed 106 (72.1%) articles have full-text Access. Overall 127 scientific journals have published these articles. Scientific Reports and Aesthetic Plastic Surgery were the top journals with four retracted publications. Hacettepe University, was the lead institute, contributing seven publications. The most common reasons for retractions were duplication 50 (34%) and most retracted notices were issued by editor 63 (42.9%). The majority of publications were from Medical Science 93 (63.3% paper) and the highest number, 44 were from surgery and allied. Turkish authors had international collaborations with 20 countries. Conclusion: The number of retracted publications is not high, the trend is increasing. To overcome this, research methodology and research ethics training are crucial.\",\"PeriodicalId\":484823,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Research Reports\",\"volume\":\"245 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Research Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55517/mrr.1303112\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Research Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55517/mrr.1303112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:如今,科学出版物的数量对职业发展和科学界的尊重至关重要。研究人员专注于增加每年的出版物数量,这有时会损害出版物的质量。本研究旨在调查土耳其作者发表的撤回出版物的特征。方法:检索PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science数据库中与“撤回出版物”和“土耳其”相关的MeSH术语和自由词。纳入标准为:(i)撤回发表和(ii)研究的任何作者与土耳其的机构有关联。提取选定出版物的书目信息。结果:从3个数据库中共检索到文献147篇。最早被撤稿的文章发表于1996年,此后撤稿数量呈上升趋势。研究显示,106篇(72.1%)文章具有全文访问。总共有127种科学期刊发表了这些文章。《科学报告》(Scientific Reports)和《美容整形外科》(Aesthetic Plastic Surgery)是排名靠前的期刊,有4篇论文被撤稿。Hacettepe大学是主要研究机构,发表了7篇论文。撤稿最常见的原因是重复50篇(34%),撤稿通知大多数是由编辑63篇(42.9%)发出的。大多数出版物来自医学科学93(63.3%),最多的44篇来自外科及相关领域。土耳其作家与20个国家有国际合作。结论:撤稿数量不高,呈上升趋势。为了克服这一点,研究方法和研究伦理培训至关重要。
Postmortem of Retracted Scientific Publications from Türkiye
Aim: These days the number of scientific publications is crucial in career advancements and respect in the scientific community. The researchers focus on increasing the number of publications per year, which sometimes compromises the quality of publications. This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of retracted publications with contributions from Turkish authors. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched with a combination of MeSH terms and free words relevant to “retracted publication/s” and “Turkey.” The inclusion criteria were (i) retracted publication and (ii) any authors of the study having affiliation with an institution in Turkey. Bibliographic information of selected publications was extracted. Results: A total of 147 publications were retrieved from three databases. The earliest retracted article was published in 1996, followed by an increasing trend of retracted publications. The study showed 106 (72.1%) articles have full-text Access. Overall 127 scientific journals have published these articles. Scientific Reports and Aesthetic Plastic Surgery were the top journals with four retracted publications. Hacettepe University, was the lead institute, contributing seven publications. The most common reasons for retractions were duplication 50 (34%) and most retracted notices were issued by editor 63 (42.9%). The majority of publications were from Medical Science 93 (63.3% paper) and the highest number, 44 were from surgery and allied. Turkish authors had international collaborations with 20 countries. Conclusion: The number of retracted publications is not high, the trend is increasing. To overcome this, research methodology and research ethics training are crucial.