国家间为追回流失文物开展合作的形式--围绕寻找最佳模式的评论 国家间为追回流失文物开展合作的形式--围绕寻找最佳模式的评论

Q2 Arts and Humanities Santander Art and Culture Law Review Pub Date : 2023-09-27 DOI:10.4467/2450050xsnr.23.004.18116
Anna Gerecka-Żołyńska, Zofia Branicka
{"title":"国家间为追回流失文物开展合作的形式--围绕寻找最佳模式的评论 国家间为追回流失文物开展合作的形式--围绕寻找最佳模式的评论","authors":"Anna Gerecka-Żołyńska, Zofia Branicka","doi":"10.4467/2450050xsnr.23.004.18116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the search for an optimal pattern of conduct for the settlement of disputes concerning the ownership of cultural property, the article characterises the legal means and conciliation initiatives available to states. The discussion is limited to the forms of cooperation confirmed in international law instruments, developed especially in the framework of UNESCO’s period of activity, as adopted in the second half of the 20th century and thereafter. In this context, the use of litigation before both the International Court of Justice and national courts is discussed. Attention is also given to conciliatory forms of dispute resolution, distinguishing between consensus initiatives involving only the states interested in resolving the dispute and forms extended to include the participation of impartial mediators supporting the parties in their search for a satisfactory solution. The article assumes that the development of an out-of-court compromise is particularly desirable when the settlement of a dispute concerning the ownership of a cultural asset by an international tribunal or national courts, due to the legal status in force, limits the prospect of obtaining a substantive settlement satisfactory to all parties involved in the conflict.","PeriodicalId":36554,"journal":{"name":"Santander Art and Culture Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Formy współpracy między państwami w celu odzyskania utraconych dóbr kultury – uwagi wokół poszukiwania optymalnego wzorca Forms of cooperation between\",\"authors\":\"Anna Gerecka-Żołyńska, Zofia Branicka\",\"doi\":\"10.4467/2450050xsnr.23.004.18116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the search for an optimal pattern of conduct for the settlement of disputes concerning the ownership of cultural property, the article characterises the legal means and conciliation initiatives available to states. The discussion is limited to the forms of cooperation confirmed in international law instruments, developed especially in the framework of UNESCO’s period of activity, as adopted in the second half of the 20th century and thereafter. In this context, the use of litigation before both the International Court of Justice and national courts is discussed. Attention is also given to conciliatory forms of dispute resolution, distinguishing between consensus initiatives involving only the states interested in resolving the dispute and forms extended to include the participation of impartial mediators supporting the parties in their search for a satisfactory solution. The article assumes that the development of an out-of-court compromise is particularly desirable when the settlement of a dispute concerning the ownership of a cultural asset by an international tribunal or national courts, due to the legal status in force, limits the prospect of obtaining a substantive settlement satisfactory to all parties involved in the conflict.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36554,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Santander Art and Culture Law Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Santander Art and Culture Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050xsnr.23.004.18116\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Santander Art and Culture Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050xsnr.23.004.18116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在寻求解决有关文化财产所有权的争端的最佳行为模式的过程中,这条规定了各国可用的法律手段和和解倡议的特点。讨论仅限于20世纪下半叶及其后通过的特别是在教科文组织活动时期框架内制定的国际法文书所确认的合作形式。在这方面,讨论了在国际法院和国家法院使用诉讼的问题。还注意解决争端的和解形式,区分只涉及对解决争端感兴趣的国家的协商一致倡议和扩大到包括支持各方寻求令人满意的解决办法的公正调解人参与的形式。该条假定,当由国际法庭或国家法院解决有关文化资产所有权的争端时,由于其现行法律地位,限制了获得使冲突各方都满意的实质性解决的前景时,特别需要制定庭外妥协方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Formy współpracy między państwami w celu odzyskania utraconych dóbr kultury – uwagi wokół poszukiwania optymalnego wzorca Forms of cooperation between
In the search for an optimal pattern of conduct for the settlement of disputes concerning the ownership of cultural property, the article characterises the legal means and conciliation initiatives available to states. The discussion is limited to the forms of cooperation confirmed in international law instruments, developed especially in the framework of UNESCO’s period of activity, as adopted in the second half of the 20th century and thereafter. In this context, the use of litigation before both the International Court of Justice and national courts is discussed. Attention is also given to conciliatory forms of dispute resolution, distinguishing between consensus initiatives involving only the states interested in resolving the dispute and forms extended to include the participation of impartial mediators supporting the parties in their search for a satisfactory solution. The article assumes that the development of an out-of-court compromise is particularly desirable when the settlement of a dispute concerning the ownership of a cultural asset by an international tribunal or national courts, due to the legal status in force, limits the prospect of obtaining a substantive settlement satisfactory to all parties involved in the conflict.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Santander Art and Culture Law Review
Santander Art and Culture Law Review Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Shaping Franco-German Cooperation in the Museum Sector Combating Illicit Trade in Cultural Objects in the Staatliche Museen zu Berlin (State Museums in Berlin): Policies in Acquisitions and Loans and Research of Provenance Trade and Export of Archaeological Cultural Goods: A Conflict of Ideas Inventorying is Reckoning Combatting the Illicit Trade in Cultural Objects: Re-visiting the 2022 EU Action Plan against Trafficking in Cultural Goods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1