科研的空间逻辑:对欧美42栋科研建筑的探索性与定量分析

IF 2.7 4区 工程技术 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Architectural Engineering and Design Management Pub Date : 2023-11-06 DOI:10.1080/17452007.2023.2270650
Xinwei Zhang, Tong Cui, Jun Lan
{"title":"科研的空间逻辑:对欧美42栋科研建筑的探索性与定量分析","authors":"Xinwei Zhang, Tong Cui, Jun Lan","doi":"10.1080/17452007.2023.2270650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTSince the nineteenth-century devolution of natural philosophy into disciplines, scientific activity has expanded from single-disciplined research to comprehensive research. The flow of information between different research teams makes scientific research and its places increasingly social, which is no longer limited to the closed laboratory workbench. Reviewing the literature, we found that the development of scientific research buildings experienced a transition from efficiency to openness. And the new organization of research communities and its demand for space put forward higher requirements for scientific research buildings. To deeply explore the design trends of scientific research buildings at this stage, the sample database is established using space syntax and K-means clustering algorithm software to quantitatively analyze spatial layouts of 42 scientific research buildings worldwide from the perspective of sociology and innovation, clustered into five categories. Each category shows a different tendency in terms of accessibility, visibility, and the proportion of public space, and the different spatial configurations and openness somehow reflect the attitude of the research organization or group towards the use of space.KEYWORDS: Scientific research buildingsspace syntaxspatial configurationclustering algorithm Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":48523,"journal":{"name":"Architectural Engineering and Design Management","volume":"15 10","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spatial logic of scientific research: an exploratory and quantitative analysis of 42 scientific research buildings sited in America and Europe\",\"authors\":\"Xinwei Zhang, Tong Cui, Jun Lan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17452007.2023.2270650\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTSince the nineteenth-century devolution of natural philosophy into disciplines, scientific activity has expanded from single-disciplined research to comprehensive research. The flow of information between different research teams makes scientific research and its places increasingly social, which is no longer limited to the closed laboratory workbench. Reviewing the literature, we found that the development of scientific research buildings experienced a transition from efficiency to openness. And the new organization of research communities and its demand for space put forward higher requirements for scientific research buildings. To deeply explore the design trends of scientific research buildings at this stage, the sample database is established using space syntax and K-means clustering algorithm software to quantitatively analyze spatial layouts of 42 scientific research buildings worldwide from the perspective of sociology and innovation, clustered into five categories. Each category shows a different tendency in terms of accessibility, visibility, and the proportion of public space, and the different spatial configurations and openness somehow reflect the attitude of the research organization or group towards the use of space.KEYWORDS: Scientific research buildingsspace syntaxspatial configurationclustering algorithm Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).\",\"PeriodicalId\":48523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Architectural Engineering and Design Management\",\"volume\":\"15 10\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Architectural Engineering and Design Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2023.2270650\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Architectural Engineering and Design Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2023.2270650","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要自19世纪自然哲学向学科转移以来,科学活动从单一学科的研究扩展到综合学科的研究。不同研究团队之间的信息流动使得科学研究及其场所越来越社会化,不再局限于封闭的实验室工作台。回顾文献,我们发现科研建筑的发展经历了从效率到开放的过渡。而新型科研共同体的组织形式及其对空间的需求对科研建筑提出了更高的要求。为深入探讨现阶段科研建筑的设计趋势,运用空间句法和K-means聚类算法软件建立样本数据库,从社会学和创新的角度定量分析全球42座科研建筑的空间布局,将其聚类为5类。每个类别在可达性、可见性、公共空间比例等方面呈现出不同的趋势,不同的空间配置和开放程度在某种程度上反映了研究机构或群体对空间使用的态度。关键词:科研建筑空间句法空间构型聚类算法披露声明作者未发现潜在利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Spatial logic of scientific research: an exploratory and quantitative analysis of 42 scientific research buildings sited in America and Europe
ABSTRACTSince the nineteenth-century devolution of natural philosophy into disciplines, scientific activity has expanded from single-disciplined research to comprehensive research. The flow of information between different research teams makes scientific research and its places increasingly social, which is no longer limited to the closed laboratory workbench. Reviewing the literature, we found that the development of scientific research buildings experienced a transition from efficiency to openness. And the new organization of research communities and its demand for space put forward higher requirements for scientific research buildings. To deeply explore the design trends of scientific research buildings at this stage, the sample database is established using space syntax and K-means clustering algorithm software to quantitatively analyze spatial layouts of 42 scientific research buildings worldwide from the perspective of sociology and innovation, clustered into five categories. Each category shows a different tendency in terms of accessibility, visibility, and the proportion of public space, and the different spatial configurations and openness somehow reflect the attitude of the research organization or group towards the use of space.KEYWORDS: Scientific research buildingsspace syntaxspatial configurationclustering algorithm Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Informative and accessible, this publication analyses and discusses the integration of the main stages within the process of design and construction and multidisciplinary collaborative working between the different professionals involved. Ideal for practitioners and academics alike, Architectural Engineering and Design Management examines specific topics on architectural technology, engineering design, building performance and building design management to highlight the interfaces between them and bridge the gap between architectural abstraction and engineering practice. Coverage includes: -Integration of architectural and engineering design -Integration of building design and construction -Building design management; planning and co-ordination, information and knowledge management, vale engineering and value management -Collaborative working and collaborative visualisation in building design -Architectural technology -Sustainable architecture -Building thermal, aural, visual and structural performance -Education and architectural engineering This journal is a valuable resource for professionals and academics (teachers, researchers and students) involved in building design and construction, including the following disciplines: -Architecture -Building Engineering -Building Service Engineering -Building Physics -Design Management and Design Coordination -Facilities Management Published papers will report on both fundamental research dealing with theoretical work and applied research dealing with practical issues and industrial innovations. In this way, readers explore the interaction between technical considerations and management issues.
期刊最新文献
Stress and deformation characteristics of ‘dual-purpose diaphragm wall’ in metro stations Critical factors that influence lean premise design implementation: a case of Hong Kong high-rise buildings Climate adaptation in traditional dwelling typologies: the case of Southern Anhui, China Enhancing student satisfaction and academic performance through school courtyard design: a quantitative analysis Optimal selection of false ceiling systems in healthcare buildings: a multidimensional hierarchical analysis for sustainability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1