用科学的方法对学生的学习效果进行结对检查的有效性

Halidin Halidin, Sirad La Ode, Marniati Marniati
{"title":"用科学的方法对学生的学习效果进行结对检查的有效性","authors":"Halidin Halidin, Sirad La Ode, Marniati Marniati","doi":"10.56442/ijble.v4i2.175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to determine the efficiency of the Pairs Check learning model with a scientific approach to students' mathematics learning results. The data on students' mathematics learning outcomes were acquired using the instrument at posttest. Descriptive statistics and inferential statistics were employed in the data analysis approach. The descriptive study found that the mathematics learning outcomes of 30 students taught using Pairs Check model using a scientific approach had an average value (mean) of 80,533. While the students who were taught using conventional learning consisting of 30 students showed an average score is 76,333. Consequently, it can be argued that learning mathematics using a pair check learning model with a scientific approach is more effective than conventional learning methods.","PeriodicalId":479953,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Business Law and Education","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PAIRS CHECK MODEL WITH A SCIENTIFIC APPROACH TO STUDENTS' LEARNING RESULTS\",\"authors\":\"Halidin Halidin, Sirad La Ode, Marniati Marniati\",\"doi\":\"10.56442/ijble.v4i2.175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research aims to determine the efficiency of the Pairs Check learning model with a scientific approach to students' mathematics learning results. The data on students' mathematics learning outcomes were acquired using the instrument at posttest. Descriptive statistics and inferential statistics were employed in the data analysis approach. The descriptive study found that the mathematics learning outcomes of 30 students taught using Pairs Check model using a scientific approach had an average value (mean) of 80,533. While the students who were taught using conventional learning consisting of 30 students showed an average score is 76,333. Consequently, it can be argued that learning mathematics using a pair check learning model with a scientific approach is more effective than conventional learning methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":479953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Business Law and Education\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Business Law and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56442/ijble.v4i2.175\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Business Law and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56442/ijble.v4i2.175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在以科学的方法确定结对检查学习模式对学生数学学习结果的影响。学生数学学习成果的数据在后测时使用该仪器获取。数据分析方法采用描述性统计和推理统计。描述性研究发现,使用科学方法的成对检查模型教学的30名学生的数学学习成果的平均值(平均值)为80,533。而由30名学生组成的传统教学组的平均成绩为76,333分。因此,可以认为,使用科学方法的成对检查学习模型比传统的学习方法更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PAIRS CHECK MODEL WITH A SCIENTIFIC APPROACH TO STUDENTS' LEARNING RESULTS
This research aims to determine the efficiency of the Pairs Check learning model with a scientific approach to students' mathematics learning results. The data on students' mathematics learning outcomes were acquired using the instrument at posttest. Descriptive statistics and inferential statistics were employed in the data analysis approach. The descriptive study found that the mathematics learning outcomes of 30 students taught using Pairs Check model using a scientific approach had an average value (mean) of 80,533. While the students who were taught using conventional learning consisting of 30 students showed an average score is 76,333. Consequently, it can be argued that learning mathematics using a pair check learning model with a scientific approach is more effective than conventional learning methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Influence of Entrepreneurial Orientation and Customer Relationship Management on MSME Competitiveness THE DIRECT AND INDIRECT EFFECT TAX PAYER UNDERSTANDING ON TAX PAYER COMPLIANCE BY TAX COMPLIANCE COST The Influence of Experiential Marketing and Integrated Marketing Communications on Visitor Loyalty Examining the Influence of CEO Characteristics and Brand Image on Performance of Food and Beverages MSMEs in Indonesia: The Mediating Role of Competitive Advantage Social Capital, Financial Capital, and Entrepreneurial Orientation: Keys to Performance in Indonesia’s MSME Clothing Industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1