{"title":"城市研究的多种和区域特定的组织形式?","authors":"Slavomíra Ferenčuhová","doi":"10.1177/27541258231203998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This short contribution comments on Bas van Heur's article ‘What, where and who is urban studies? On research centres in an unequal world’, a highly original analysis of the state of the art in urban studies complemented by provocative propositions to challenge existing global hierarchies of knowledge production. While I am enthusiastic about this work, I also propose considering in greater detail the interpretational risks associated with van Heur's operationalisation of urban studies as the publication production of multidisciplinary research centres. Specifically, I underline the observation that the article already implicitly contends that the organisational form of multidisciplinary and cross-university urban studies centres may be less likely to emerge in some contexts than in others. Thus, mapping various organisational forms that urban studies take across the world, as well as their history, might usefully complement the project. Yet, the critical question remains – how to do this?","PeriodicalId":206933,"journal":{"name":"Dialogues in Urban Research","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multiple and regionally specific organisational forms of urban studies?\",\"authors\":\"Slavomíra Ferenčuhová\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/27541258231203998\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This short contribution comments on Bas van Heur's article ‘What, where and who is urban studies? On research centres in an unequal world’, a highly original analysis of the state of the art in urban studies complemented by provocative propositions to challenge existing global hierarchies of knowledge production. While I am enthusiastic about this work, I also propose considering in greater detail the interpretational risks associated with van Heur's operationalisation of urban studies as the publication production of multidisciplinary research centres. Specifically, I underline the observation that the article already implicitly contends that the organisational form of multidisciplinary and cross-university urban studies centres may be less likely to emerge in some contexts than in others. Thus, mapping various organisational forms that urban studies take across the world, as well as their history, might usefully complement the project. Yet, the critical question remains – how to do this?\",\"PeriodicalId\":206933,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dialogues in Urban Research\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dialogues in Urban Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/27541258231203998\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dialogues in Urban Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27541258231203998","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
这篇短文是对Bas van Heur的文章“城市研究是什么,在哪里,谁是城市研究?”《在一个不平等的世界中的研究中心》,对城市研究的艺术现状进行了高度原创的分析,并辅以挑战现有全球知识生产等级的挑衅性命题。虽然我对这项工作充满热情,但我也建议更详细地考虑范赫尔将城市研究作为多学科研究中心的出版物进行运作所带来的解释风险。具体地说,我强调这篇文章已经含蓄地认为,多学科和跨大学城市研究中心的组织形式在某些情况下可能比在其他情况下更不可能出现。因此,绘制世界各地城市研究的各种组织形式,以及它们的历史,可能会有效地补充该项目。然而,关键的问题仍然存在——如何做到这一点?
Multiple and regionally specific organisational forms of urban studies?
This short contribution comments on Bas van Heur's article ‘What, where and who is urban studies? On research centres in an unequal world’, a highly original analysis of the state of the art in urban studies complemented by provocative propositions to challenge existing global hierarchies of knowledge production. While I am enthusiastic about this work, I also propose considering in greater detail the interpretational risks associated with van Heur's operationalisation of urban studies as the publication production of multidisciplinary research centres. Specifically, I underline the observation that the article already implicitly contends that the organisational form of multidisciplinary and cross-university urban studies centres may be less likely to emerge in some contexts than in others. Thus, mapping various organisational forms that urban studies take across the world, as well as their history, might usefully complement the project. Yet, the critical question remains – how to do this?