藏红花植株的生殖球茎产生和柱头产量受种植方式和球茎深度的影响

IF 0.7 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Journal of Central European Agriculture Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5513/jcea01/24.3.3896
Ahmad Yar Ahmadi, Qasimullah Ryan, Shafigul Shafiqi, Mohmmad Wali Salari, qiamudin Abad
{"title":"藏红花植株的生殖球茎产生和柱头产量受种植方式和球茎深度的影响","authors":"Ahmad Yar Ahmadi, Qasimullah Ryan, Shafigul Shafiqi, Mohmmad Wali Salari, qiamudin Abad","doi":"10.5513/jcea01/24.3.3896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Planting methods and corm depth may damage the underground corms of saffron during the dormant period in heavy rainfall areas. Consideration of proper planting methods and corm depth will lead to a higher yield of saffron. This research was conducted for two successive seasons (2020 - 2021 and 2021 - 2022) to study the influence of planting method and corm depth on the dry stigma and generative corm yield of saffron. The experiment was a factorial combination of two planting methods (ridge and flat) and three corm depths (10 cm, 15 cm, and 20 cm), laid out as a randomized complete block design (RCBD). Results revealed that dry sigma yield (DSY) and generative corm yield (GCY) were significantly influenced by the main and interaction effects of planting method and corm depth. In flat cultivation, both DSY and GCY were considerably higher than the ridge method in both years. In the case of corm depth, 15 cm and 20 cm produced the highest DSY. The interaction effects showed that the flat method in 15cm corm depth produced more DSY and GCY. Moreover, a strong positive correlation was obtained among the days to flowering (DTF) and flowering interval days (FID) first year, the number of flowers (NF) and DSY in both years and among the DSY and the number of generative corms (> 8 g). Hence, the flat method and 15 cm corm depth are recommended for optimum yield in the study area.","PeriodicalId":51685,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Central European Agriculture","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The saffron plant´s generative corm generation and stigma yield are influenced by planting methods and corm depths\",\"authors\":\"Ahmad Yar Ahmadi, Qasimullah Ryan, Shafigul Shafiqi, Mohmmad Wali Salari, qiamudin Abad\",\"doi\":\"10.5513/jcea01/24.3.3896\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Planting methods and corm depth may damage the underground corms of saffron during the dormant period in heavy rainfall areas. Consideration of proper planting methods and corm depth will lead to a higher yield of saffron. This research was conducted for two successive seasons (2020 - 2021 and 2021 - 2022) to study the influence of planting method and corm depth on the dry stigma and generative corm yield of saffron. The experiment was a factorial combination of two planting methods (ridge and flat) and three corm depths (10 cm, 15 cm, and 20 cm), laid out as a randomized complete block design (RCBD). Results revealed that dry sigma yield (DSY) and generative corm yield (GCY) were significantly influenced by the main and interaction effects of planting method and corm depth. In flat cultivation, both DSY and GCY were considerably higher than the ridge method in both years. In the case of corm depth, 15 cm and 20 cm produced the highest DSY. The interaction effects showed that the flat method in 15cm corm depth produced more DSY and GCY. Moreover, a strong positive correlation was obtained among the days to flowering (DTF) and flowering interval days (FID) first year, the number of flowers (NF) and DSY in both years and among the DSY and the number of generative corms (> 8 g). Hence, the flat method and 15 cm corm depth are recommended for optimum yield in the study area.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51685,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Central European Agriculture\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Central European Agriculture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5513/jcea01/24.3.3896\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Central European Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5513/jcea01/24.3.3896","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在多雨地区,种植方法和球茎深度可能对藏红花的地下球茎造成损伤。考虑适当的种植方法和球茎深度将导致更高的藏红花产量。本研究连续两个季节(2020 - 2021年和2021 - 2022年),研究种植方式和球茎深度对藏红花干柱头和再生球茎产量的影响。试验采用两种种植方法(垄栽和平栽)和三种球茎深度(10 cm、15 cm和20 cm)的因子组合,采用随机完全区组设计(RCBD)。结果表明,种植方式和球茎深度对玉米干产量(DSY)和生殖产量(GCY)有显著影响。在平耕条件下,DSY和GCY均显著高于垄作;在茎深的情况下,15 cm和20 cm的DSY最高。互作效应表明,在15cm的球茎深度,扁平法能产生更多的DSY和GCY。此外,第一年的开花日数(DTF)和开花间隔日数(FID)、两年度的花数(NF)和DSY以及DSY与生殖球茎数(> 8 g)之间存在较强的正相关关系。因此,建议研究区采用平整法,球茎深度为15 cm。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The saffron plant´s generative corm generation and stigma yield are influenced by planting methods and corm depths
Planting methods and corm depth may damage the underground corms of saffron during the dormant period in heavy rainfall areas. Consideration of proper planting methods and corm depth will lead to a higher yield of saffron. This research was conducted for two successive seasons (2020 - 2021 and 2021 - 2022) to study the influence of planting method and corm depth on the dry stigma and generative corm yield of saffron. The experiment was a factorial combination of two planting methods (ridge and flat) and three corm depths (10 cm, 15 cm, and 20 cm), laid out as a randomized complete block design (RCBD). Results revealed that dry sigma yield (DSY) and generative corm yield (GCY) were significantly influenced by the main and interaction effects of planting method and corm depth. In flat cultivation, both DSY and GCY were considerably higher than the ridge method in both years. In the case of corm depth, 15 cm and 20 cm produced the highest DSY. The interaction effects showed that the flat method in 15cm corm depth produced more DSY and GCY. Moreover, a strong positive correlation was obtained among the days to flowering (DTF) and flowering interval days (FID) first year, the number of flowers (NF) and DSY in both years and among the DSY and the number of generative corms (> 8 g). Hence, the flat method and 15 cm corm depth are recommended for optimum yield in the study area.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Central European Agriculture
Journal of Central European Agriculture AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
46
审稿时长
50 weeks
期刊介绍: - General agriculture - Animal science - Plant science - Environment in relation to agricultural production, land use and wildlife management - Agricultural economics and rural development
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of anti-transpiration on yield and quality of sugar beet subjected to water stress The effect of laccase enzyme addition to soft Syrian wheat flour or blending with durum flour on the rheological properties of dough Metabolism and utilisation of non-protein nitrogen compounds in ruminants: a review Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) gas exchange capacity under nutrient deficiency Association study between g.16024A>G polymorphism of the FASN gene and milk production of Holstein cattle
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1