南非青少年对医疗干预的自我同意

A E Strode, Z Essack, C M Slack
{"title":"南非青少年对医疗干预的自我同意","authors":"A E Strode, Z Essack, C M Slack","doi":"10.7196/sajch.2023.v17i3.1992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"South African law provides that children under 18 years old can self-consent to medical treatments and terminations of pregnancy.An article published by van Heerden et al. in the South African Journal of Child Health in 2020 found that children 12 years and olderwere able to give informed consent to medical procedures because they were able to make a treatment choice, comprehend information, weigh options and provide reasons for their decision. However, only children older than 14 years possessed actual understanding of more abstract concepts. This paper considers whether the law is consistent with empirical data on child capacity. It does so by examining the evolution of laws regarding child capacity, interrogating current legal standards on capacity and ultimately evaluating whether the law reflects current empirical knowledge. We conclude that the law on medical treatment is not in conflict with the findings of van Heerden et al. However, there is less synergy between law and empirical data regarding terminations of pregnancy for children under 14 years old.Parliament placed an emphasis on access to health services and did not want age or parental consent to act as a barrier to adolescentsgetting medical assistance; however, data show that children younger than 14 years old struggle with more complex and abstract medical choices. We suggest that the recommendations in the Choice Act for counselling in terminations of pregnancy by children under the age of 14 years need to be more fully operationalised through the issuing of regulations or a national policy.Keywords. consent; medical treatment; capacity; law.","PeriodicalId":44732,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Child Health","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adolescent self-consent to medical interventions in South Africa\",\"authors\":\"A E Strode, Z Essack, C M Slack\",\"doi\":\"10.7196/sajch.2023.v17i3.1992\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"South African law provides that children under 18 years old can self-consent to medical treatments and terminations of pregnancy.An article published by van Heerden et al. in the South African Journal of Child Health in 2020 found that children 12 years and olderwere able to give informed consent to medical procedures because they were able to make a treatment choice, comprehend information, weigh options and provide reasons for their decision. However, only children older than 14 years possessed actual understanding of more abstract concepts. This paper considers whether the law is consistent with empirical data on child capacity. It does so by examining the evolution of laws regarding child capacity, interrogating current legal standards on capacity and ultimately evaluating whether the law reflects current empirical knowledge. We conclude that the law on medical treatment is not in conflict with the findings of van Heerden et al. However, there is less synergy between law and empirical data regarding terminations of pregnancy for children under 14 years old.Parliament placed an emphasis on access to health services and did not want age or parental consent to act as a barrier to adolescentsgetting medical assistance; however, data show that children younger than 14 years old struggle with more complex and abstract medical choices. We suggest that the recommendations in the Choice Act for counselling in terminations of pregnancy by children under the age of 14 years need to be more fully operationalised through the issuing of regulations or a national policy.Keywords. consent; medical treatment; capacity; law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Journal of Child Health\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Journal of Child Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7196/sajch.2023.v17i3.1992\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Child Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/sajch.2023.v17i3.1992","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

南非法律规定,18岁以下的儿童可以自行同意接受治疗和终止妊娠。van Heerden等人于2020年在《南非儿童健康杂志》上发表的一篇文章发现,12岁及以上的儿童能够对医疗程序给予知情同意,因为他们能够做出治疗选择,理解信息,权衡选择并提供决定的理由。然而,只有14岁以上的孩子才能真正理解更抽象的概念。本文考虑法律是否与儿童能力的实证数据一致。它通过审查有关儿童能力的法律的演变,询问目前关于能力的法律标准,并最终评估法律是否反映了目前的经验知识来做到这一点。我们的结论是,关于医疗的法律与van Heerden等人的发现并不冲突。然而,关于14岁以下儿童终止妊娠的法律和经验数据之间的协同作用较少。议会强调获得保健服务的机会,不希望年龄或父母同意成为青少年获得医疗援助的障碍;然而,数据显示,14岁以下的儿童在更复杂和抽象的医疗选择上挣扎。我们建议,《选择法案》中关于14岁以下儿童终止妊娠咨询的建议需要通过颁布法规或国家政策来更全面地实施。同意;医疗;能力;法律。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Adolescent self-consent to medical interventions in South Africa
South African law provides that children under 18 years old can self-consent to medical treatments and terminations of pregnancy.An article published by van Heerden et al. in the South African Journal of Child Health in 2020 found that children 12 years and olderwere able to give informed consent to medical procedures because they were able to make a treatment choice, comprehend information, weigh options and provide reasons for their decision. However, only children older than 14 years possessed actual understanding of more abstract concepts. This paper considers whether the law is consistent with empirical data on child capacity. It does so by examining the evolution of laws regarding child capacity, interrogating current legal standards on capacity and ultimately evaluating whether the law reflects current empirical knowledge. We conclude that the law on medical treatment is not in conflict with the findings of van Heerden et al. However, there is less synergy between law and empirical data regarding terminations of pregnancy for children under 14 years old.Parliament placed an emphasis on access to health services and did not want age or parental consent to act as a barrier to adolescentsgetting medical assistance; however, data show that children younger than 14 years old struggle with more complex and abstract medical choices. We suggest that the recommendations in the Choice Act for counselling in terminations of pregnancy by children under the age of 14 years need to be more fully operationalised through the issuing of regulations or a national policy.Keywords. consent; medical treatment; capacity; law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Low birthweight and maternal smoking as predictors of infant lung function from a South African birth cohort within low socioeconomic communities An audit of electronic discharge summaries of neonates admitted with hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy to tertiary hospitals in [City], 2018–2019. Borderline hypernatraemia and mortality rates in South African infants: A single-centre observational study The cost-effectiveness and value of C-reactive protein in the diagnosis and management of neonatal late-onset sepsis in resource-limited settings Issue 4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1