剖析“死一般的沉默”:在卡尼诺拉的斯洛文尼亚报纸和三月前的审查制度

IF 0.2 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE NEOHELICON Pub Date : 2023-09-25 DOI:10.1007/s11059-023-00707-8
Marijan Dović
{"title":"剖析“死一般的沉默”:在卡尼诺拉的斯洛文尼亚报纸和三月前的审查制度","authors":"Marijan Dović","doi":"10.1007/s11059-023-00707-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The media landscape of the Habsburg Monarchy in the pre-March period was relatively meagre. In Carniola and other Austrian crownlands with a Slovenian population, the opportunities for literary development were limited: this is well evidenced by the ban on the publication of Slavinja in mid-1820 as well as by the many conflicts Krajnska čbelica (‘The Carniolan Bee’) had with censorship in the early 1830s. The modesty of literary activity in Slovenia at this time is often related to the low level of education and literacy among the population, discontinuity in the development of literary culture, and the general underdevelopment of the emerging Slovenian literary and media systems. However, imperial censorship also decisively contributed to this state of affairs. This article therefore outlines the functioning of the pre-March censorship apparatus at the state and local levels, showing how the censorship office in Vienna (headed by the count Josef Sedlnitzky) systematically blocked attempts to establish Slovenian-language periodicals ( Slavinja , Slovenske novice ‘Slovenian News’ with its supplement Zora ‘The Dawn’, and Ilirske novice ‘Illyrian News’ with its supplement Ilirski Merkur ‘The Illyrian Mercury’) and how local factors were involved in these processes. It is argued that the power to ban a newspaper had a much stronger impact on the Slovenian press than the activities of local or state censorship. In particular, the long struggle to establish Kmetijske in rokodelske novice (‘Agricultural and Handicraft News’) between 1838 and 1843 testifies to the early tendency of the imperial censorship apparatus to block the respective national(ist) agendas.","PeriodicalId":54002,"journal":{"name":"NEOHELICON","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anatomy of the “deathly silence”: Slovenian newspapers in Carniola and the pre-March censorship\",\"authors\":\"Marijan Dović\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11059-023-00707-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The media landscape of the Habsburg Monarchy in the pre-March period was relatively meagre. In Carniola and other Austrian crownlands with a Slovenian population, the opportunities for literary development were limited: this is well evidenced by the ban on the publication of Slavinja in mid-1820 as well as by the many conflicts Krajnska čbelica (‘The Carniolan Bee’) had with censorship in the early 1830s. The modesty of literary activity in Slovenia at this time is often related to the low level of education and literacy among the population, discontinuity in the development of literary culture, and the general underdevelopment of the emerging Slovenian literary and media systems. However, imperial censorship also decisively contributed to this state of affairs. This article therefore outlines the functioning of the pre-March censorship apparatus at the state and local levels, showing how the censorship office in Vienna (headed by the count Josef Sedlnitzky) systematically blocked attempts to establish Slovenian-language periodicals ( Slavinja , Slovenske novice ‘Slovenian News’ with its supplement Zora ‘The Dawn’, and Ilirske novice ‘Illyrian News’ with its supplement Ilirski Merkur ‘The Illyrian Mercury’) and how local factors were involved in these processes. It is argued that the power to ban a newspaper had a much stronger impact on the Slovenian press than the activities of local or state censorship. In particular, the long struggle to establish Kmetijske in rokodelske novice (‘Agricultural and Handicraft News’) between 1838 and 1843 testifies to the early tendency of the imperial censorship apparatus to block the respective national(ist) agendas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NEOHELICON\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NEOHELICON\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-023-00707-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEOHELICON","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-023-00707-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

三月前哈布斯堡王朝的媒体景观相对贫乏。在卡尼奥拉和其他有斯洛文尼亚人居住的奥地利王室领地,文学发展的机会是有限的:1820年中期《斯拉夫inja》的出版被禁,以及19世纪30年代初《卡尼奥拉蜜蜂》与审查制度的许多冲突,都充分证明了这一点。在这个时期,斯洛文尼亚文学活动的低调往往与人口的低教育水平和识字率、文学文化发展的不连续性以及新兴的斯洛文尼亚文学和媒体系统的普遍不发达有关。然而,帝国的审查制度也决定性地促成了这种状况。因此,本文概述了三月前国家和地方审查机构的运作,展示了维也纳审查办公室(由Josef Sedlnitzky伯爵领导)如何有系统地阻止建立斯洛文尼亚语期刊的尝试(Slavinja,斯洛文尼亚语新“斯洛文尼亚新闻”及其副刊Zora“黎明”,伊利尔斯基新“伊利里亚新闻”及其副刊伊利尔斯基“伊利里亚水星”)以及当地因素如何参与这些过程。有人认为,取缔一家报纸的权力对斯洛文尼亚新闻界的影响要比地方或国家的审查活动大得多。特别是,1838年至1843年间在rokodelske(“农业和手工业新闻”)上建立Kmetijske的长期斗争证明了帝国审查机构早期倾向于阻止各自的国家(清单)议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Anatomy of the “deathly silence”: Slovenian newspapers in Carniola and the pre-March censorship
Abstract The media landscape of the Habsburg Monarchy in the pre-March period was relatively meagre. In Carniola and other Austrian crownlands with a Slovenian population, the opportunities for literary development were limited: this is well evidenced by the ban on the publication of Slavinja in mid-1820 as well as by the many conflicts Krajnska čbelica (‘The Carniolan Bee’) had with censorship in the early 1830s. The modesty of literary activity in Slovenia at this time is often related to the low level of education and literacy among the population, discontinuity in the development of literary culture, and the general underdevelopment of the emerging Slovenian literary and media systems. However, imperial censorship also decisively contributed to this state of affairs. This article therefore outlines the functioning of the pre-March censorship apparatus at the state and local levels, showing how the censorship office in Vienna (headed by the count Josef Sedlnitzky) systematically blocked attempts to establish Slovenian-language periodicals ( Slavinja , Slovenske novice ‘Slovenian News’ with its supplement Zora ‘The Dawn’, and Ilirske novice ‘Illyrian News’ with its supplement Ilirski Merkur ‘The Illyrian Mercury’) and how local factors were involved in these processes. It is argued that the power to ban a newspaper had a much stronger impact on the Slovenian press than the activities of local or state censorship. In particular, the long struggle to establish Kmetijske in rokodelske novice (‘Agricultural and Handicraft News’) between 1838 and 1843 testifies to the early tendency of the imperial censorship apparatus to block the respective national(ist) agendas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NEOHELICON
NEOHELICON LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Neohelicon welcomes studies on all aspects of comparative and world literature, critical theory and practice.  In the discussion of literary historical topics (including literary movements, epochs, or regions), analytical contributions based on a solidly-anchored methodology are preferred.
期刊最新文献
Future present: cli-fi’s representational challenge Representing stream of consciousness in comics: definition and categorization Electronic literary creation: dialogues through cultural recycling The time of data. theoretical thinking, statistical thinking Past present: Coal and Hard Times
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1