Instagram效应:社交媒体是否影响公共土地的访问量?

IF 1.3 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Land Economics Pub Date : 2023-09-25 DOI:10.3368/le.100.2.122920-0192r1
Ashley Lowe Mackenzie, Steven J. Dundas, Bo Zhao
{"title":"Instagram效应:社交媒体是否影响公共土地的访问量?","authors":"Ashley Lowe Mackenzie, Steven J. Dundas, Bo Zhao","doi":"10.3368/le.100.2.122920-0192r1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> Public lands in the United States have recently experienced significant increases in visitation. Journalists and park managers suggest Instagram as a reason for the increase. We explore this issue in the Oregon State Park system by combining visitation data with park-specific georeferenced content and engagement indicators from Instagram. Using several empirical specifications, we show suggestive evidence that Instagram is not likely correlated to increased visitation everywhere, but only in a few locations generating high user participation within the app. We find no contemporary effect and a positive association with cumulative Instagram engagement indicators on visits at this subset of parks.","PeriodicalId":51378,"journal":{"name":"Land Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Instagram Effect: Is Social Media Influencing Visitation to Public Land?\",\"authors\":\"Ashley Lowe Mackenzie, Steven J. Dundas, Bo Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.3368/le.100.2.122920-0192r1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Abstract</h3> Public lands in the United States have recently experienced significant increases in visitation. Journalists and park managers suggest Instagram as a reason for the increase. We explore this issue in the Oregon State Park system by combining visitation data with park-specific georeferenced content and engagement indicators from Instagram. Using several empirical specifications, we show suggestive evidence that Instagram is not likely correlated to increased visitation everywhere, but only in a few locations generating high user participation within the app. We find no contemporary effect and a positive association with cumulative Instagram engagement indicators on visits at this subset of parks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Land Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Land Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3368/le.100.2.122920-0192r1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3368/le.100.2.122920-0192r1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国的公共土地最近经历了游客的显著增加。记者和公园管理人员认为Instagram是游客人数增加的原因之一。我们在俄勒冈州立公园系统中探讨了这一问题,将游客数据与特定公园的地理参考内容和Instagram的参与度指标相结合。使用几个经验规范,我们展示了暗含性的证据,表明Instagram不太可能与任何地方的访问量增加相关,而只在少数几个地方产生高用户参与度的应用程序中。我们发现,在这部分公园的访问量上,Instagram的累积参与度指标没有当代效应,而是与之呈正相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Instagram Effect: Is Social Media Influencing Visitation to Public Land?

Abstract

Public lands in the United States have recently experienced significant increases in visitation. Journalists and park managers suggest Instagram as a reason for the increase. We explore this issue in the Oregon State Park system by combining visitation data with park-specific georeferenced content and engagement indicators from Instagram. Using several empirical specifications, we show suggestive evidence that Instagram is not likely correlated to increased visitation everywhere, but only in a few locations generating high user participation within the app. We find no contemporary effect and a positive association with cumulative Instagram engagement indicators on visits at this subset of parks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Land Economics
Land Economics Multiple-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Land Economics is dedicated to the study of land use, natural resources, public utilities, housing, and urban land issues. Established in 1925 by the renowned economist and founder of the American Economic Association, Richard T. Ely at the University of Wisconsin, Land Economics has consistently published innovative, conceptual, and empirical research of direct relevance to economists. Each issue brings the latest results in international applied research on such topics as transportation, energy, urban and rural land use, housing, environmental quality, public utilities, and natural resources.
期刊最新文献
Does Peer Adoption Increase the Diffusion of Pollution Prevention Practices? The Impact of Weather Risk on Tenure Security Race and Concern for the Environment The Demand for Voluntary Carbon Dioxide Removal Housing Market Capitalization of Pipeline Risk
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1