{"title":"北京、上海、广州等中国主要特大城市的旅游业与房价之间的联系","authors":"Tsung-Pao Wu, Hung-Che Wu, Ya-Tian Liu, Ruixin Deng, Yu-Yu Wu","doi":"10.1080/19407963.2023.2273556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThe main goal of this study is to look at the relationship between tourism and housing prices (HPs) in three important Chinese cities: Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou. We use a unique statistical approach called quantile-on-quantile (QQ) to examine this connection. The findings of the study show a favorable relationship between tourism and HPs in these megacities, with notable variances reported across different quantiles within the cities. For each metropolitan center, these findings have substantial policy ramifications. In a number of important ways, our research adds to the body of information in the existing literature. First, this paper illuminates the fascinating dynamics of China’s tourism sector. Second, it is the first inquiry to look at how tourism-related activities and HPs are related using the QQ approach. To give a novel perspective to the investigation, this paper uses the QQ technique to ascertain how actual international tourism receipts and HPs are related.KEYWORDS: Tourismhousing pricesquantile-on-quantile estimationmegacityChina Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Here is the website for the data: http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/","PeriodicalId":46316,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Policy Research in Tourism Leisure and Events","volume":"23 19","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The linkage between tourism and housing prices of China’s leading megacities: Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou\",\"authors\":\"Tsung-Pao Wu, Hung-Che Wu, Ya-Tian Liu, Ruixin Deng, Yu-Yu Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19407963.2023.2273556\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTThe main goal of this study is to look at the relationship between tourism and housing prices (HPs) in three important Chinese cities: Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou. We use a unique statistical approach called quantile-on-quantile (QQ) to examine this connection. The findings of the study show a favorable relationship between tourism and HPs in these megacities, with notable variances reported across different quantiles within the cities. For each metropolitan center, these findings have substantial policy ramifications. In a number of important ways, our research adds to the body of information in the existing literature. First, this paper illuminates the fascinating dynamics of China’s tourism sector. Second, it is the first inquiry to look at how tourism-related activities and HPs are related using the QQ approach. To give a novel perspective to the investigation, this paper uses the QQ technique to ascertain how actual international tourism receipts and HPs are related.KEYWORDS: Tourismhousing pricesquantile-on-quantile estimationmegacityChina Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Here is the website for the data: http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/\",\"PeriodicalId\":46316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Policy Research in Tourism Leisure and Events\",\"volume\":\"23 19\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Policy Research in Tourism Leisure and Events\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19407963.2023.2273556\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Policy Research in Tourism Leisure and Events","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19407963.2023.2273556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
The linkage between tourism and housing prices of China’s leading megacities: Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou
ABSTRACTThe main goal of this study is to look at the relationship between tourism and housing prices (HPs) in three important Chinese cities: Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou. We use a unique statistical approach called quantile-on-quantile (QQ) to examine this connection. The findings of the study show a favorable relationship between tourism and HPs in these megacities, with notable variances reported across different quantiles within the cities. For each metropolitan center, these findings have substantial policy ramifications. In a number of important ways, our research adds to the body of information in the existing literature. First, this paper illuminates the fascinating dynamics of China’s tourism sector. Second, it is the first inquiry to look at how tourism-related activities and HPs are related using the QQ approach. To give a novel perspective to the investigation, this paper uses the QQ technique to ascertain how actual international tourism receipts and HPs are related.KEYWORDS: Tourismhousing pricesquantile-on-quantile estimationmegacityChina Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Here is the website for the data: http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/
期刊介绍:
Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure & Events provides a unique forum for critical discussion of public policy debates relating to the fields of tourism, leisure and events. This encompasses the economic, social, cultural, political and environmental dimensions of official intervention. In addition to high quality theoretical and empirical papers, the journal publishes contributions examining the value of contrasting methodologies, or advocacy of novel methods. Inter- and multi-disciplinary submissions are particularly welcome. In order to foster debate and extend the scope of discussion, it publishes shorter carefully argued position statements on specific, topical interventions in the Contemporary Policy Debates section. In addition, the journal’s novel Dialogues section involves ‘point/counter-point’ debates between contributors on a range of policy-related or policy research-related topics. These may interrogate key concepts from different cultural, theoretical or spatial perspectives, or discuss potential responses to a range of practical challenges involved in undertaking policy-related research in the fields of tourism, leisure and events. With a swiftly growing academic reputation, the journal is ‘B’ rated by the Australian Business Deans Council (ABDC). It has received citations from a number of senior practitioners and influential bodies, including the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).