老年人参与与减少洪水风险:社区参与的创新及其溢出效应

B. R. Cook, P. Kamstra, R. Winterton, R. Willis, R. Kammoora
{"title":"老年人参与与减少洪水风险:社区参与的创新及其溢出效应","authors":"B. R. Cook, P. Kamstra, R. Winterton, R. Willis, R. Kammoora","doi":"10.1142/s2345737623410014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a growing recognition that community engagement generates spillover effects, though few empirical analyses have accounted for these often intangible and nonlinear impacts. In the broader political economy of disaster risk reduction (DRR), spillovers present participatory research and practice with opportunities for leveling the resource arguments that currently favor deficit-based communications. A central, unexplored hypothesis of participatory research is as follows: If spillovers result from some forms of community engagement, affecting change in participants and non-participants, then the associated costs of community engagement may be justified by the value of changes that spillover. The possibility of spillovers, while enticing, is hampered by present gaps with regard to the ability to design, implement, and measure targeted spillovers. More simply, spillovers likely follow all social relations, but the ability to target specific outcomes following participation remains presently unknown. Focusing on flood risk reduction in Melbourne, Australia, the community engagement for disaster risk reduction (CEDRR) project utilized “relationship building” to test whether efforts to support flood risk reduction also resulted in spillovers to other aspects of participants’ lives, including to non-participants. To analyze this theoretical possibility, we partnered with a senior citizens’ organization: The University of the Third Age (U3A). Within DRR, senior citizens are often portrayed as inherently vulnerable; while within the aging literature, loneliness and isolation are shown to be key detriments to “successful aging”. The relationship-building methodology, then, aligns with both community engagement and successful aging literatures, enabling an analysis of targeted spillovers related to risk reduction actions and successful aging. Engagements on the topic of flood risk were analyzed to determine whether they had spillover effects on participants’ flood risk actions or on their successful aging outcomes. Findings from 45 remote survey-interviews and 30 follow-up engagements demonstrate that relationship building is an enjoyable form of community engagement able to promote learning, skill development, and intellectual risk-taking (i.e., elements of successful aging). In addition to successful aging, relationship building also contributed to household flood risk reduction behaviors, as well as initiating spillovers to non-participants. These exploratory findings suggest an under-accounted impact of participatory flood risk reduction, which suggests a need to broaden the measurement of “impacts” to include the benefits that spillover to other risk contexts and/or to other individuals.","PeriodicalId":73748,"journal":{"name":"Journal of extreme events","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Engaging Senior Citizens and Flood Risk Reduction: Innovations in Community Engagement and the Resulting Spillover Effects\",\"authors\":\"B. R. Cook, P. Kamstra, R. Winterton, R. Willis, R. Kammoora\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/s2345737623410014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is a growing recognition that community engagement generates spillover effects, though few empirical analyses have accounted for these often intangible and nonlinear impacts. In the broader political economy of disaster risk reduction (DRR), spillovers present participatory research and practice with opportunities for leveling the resource arguments that currently favor deficit-based communications. A central, unexplored hypothesis of participatory research is as follows: If spillovers result from some forms of community engagement, affecting change in participants and non-participants, then the associated costs of community engagement may be justified by the value of changes that spillover. The possibility of spillovers, while enticing, is hampered by present gaps with regard to the ability to design, implement, and measure targeted spillovers. More simply, spillovers likely follow all social relations, but the ability to target specific outcomes following participation remains presently unknown. Focusing on flood risk reduction in Melbourne, Australia, the community engagement for disaster risk reduction (CEDRR) project utilized “relationship building” to test whether efforts to support flood risk reduction also resulted in spillovers to other aspects of participants’ lives, including to non-participants. To analyze this theoretical possibility, we partnered with a senior citizens’ organization: The University of the Third Age (U3A). Within DRR, senior citizens are often portrayed as inherently vulnerable; while within the aging literature, loneliness and isolation are shown to be key detriments to “successful aging”. The relationship-building methodology, then, aligns with both community engagement and successful aging literatures, enabling an analysis of targeted spillovers related to risk reduction actions and successful aging. Engagements on the topic of flood risk were analyzed to determine whether they had spillover effects on participants’ flood risk actions or on their successful aging outcomes. Findings from 45 remote survey-interviews and 30 follow-up engagements demonstrate that relationship building is an enjoyable form of community engagement able to promote learning, skill development, and intellectual risk-taking (i.e., elements of successful aging). In addition to successful aging, relationship building also contributed to household flood risk reduction behaviors, as well as initiating spillovers to non-participants. These exploratory findings suggest an under-accounted impact of participatory flood risk reduction, which suggests a need to broaden the measurement of “impacts” to include the benefits that spillover to other risk contexts and/or to other individuals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of extreme events\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of extreme events\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2345737623410014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of extreme events","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2345737623410014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

越来越多的人认识到,社区参与会产生溢出效应,尽管很少有实证分析考虑到这些往往是无形的和非线性的影响。在减少灾害风险(DRR)的更广泛的政治经济学中,溢出效应为参与性研究和实践提供了平衡目前支持基于赤字的沟通的资源争论的机会。参与性研究的一个核心、未被探索的假设如下:如果某些形式的社区参与产生溢出效应,影响参与者和非参与者的变化,那么社区参与的相关成本可能会被溢出效应变化的价值所证明。溢出效应的可能性虽然诱人,但由于目前在设计、实施和衡量有针对性溢出效应的能力方面存在差距而受到阻碍。更简单地说,所有社会关系都可能产生溢出效应,但目前尚不清楚参与后是否有针对性地产生具体结果。减少灾害风险的社区参与(CEDRR)项目以澳大利亚墨尔本的减少洪水风险为重点,利用“建立关系”来测试支持减少洪水风险的努力是否也会对参与者生活的其他方面产生溢出效应,包括对非参与者。为了分析这种理论上的可能性,我们与一个老年人组织合作:第三时代大学(U3A)。在DRR内部,老年人往往被描绘成天生脆弱的;而在有关老龄化的文献中,孤独和孤立被证明是“成功老龄化”的主要危害。因此,关系建立方法与社区参与和成功老龄化文献相一致,从而能够分析与降低风险行动和成功老龄化相关的有针对性的溢出效应。对洪水风险主题的参与进行了分析,以确定它们是否对参与者的洪水风险行为或他们成功的老龄化结果具有溢出效应。来自45个远程调查访谈和30个后续活动的结果表明,建立关系是一种令人愉快的社区参与形式,能够促进学习、技能发展和智力冒险(即成功老龄化的要素)。除了成功的老龄化,关系的建立也有助于家庭减少洪水风险的行为,以及对非参与者的溢出效应。这些探索性发现表明,参与式减少洪水风险的影响被低估了,这表明需要扩大“影响”的衡量范围,以包括对其他风险环境和/或其他个人的溢出效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Engaging Senior Citizens and Flood Risk Reduction: Innovations in Community Engagement and the Resulting Spillover Effects
There is a growing recognition that community engagement generates spillover effects, though few empirical analyses have accounted for these often intangible and nonlinear impacts. In the broader political economy of disaster risk reduction (DRR), spillovers present participatory research and practice with opportunities for leveling the resource arguments that currently favor deficit-based communications. A central, unexplored hypothesis of participatory research is as follows: If spillovers result from some forms of community engagement, affecting change in participants and non-participants, then the associated costs of community engagement may be justified by the value of changes that spillover. The possibility of spillovers, while enticing, is hampered by present gaps with regard to the ability to design, implement, and measure targeted spillovers. More simply, spillovers likely follow all social relations, but the ability to target specific outcomes following participation remains presently unknown. Focusing on flood risk reduction in Melbourne, Australia, the community engagement for disaster risk reduction (CEDRR) project utilized “relationship building” to test whether efforts to support flood risk reduction also resulted in spillovers to other aspects of participants’ lives, including to non-participants. To analyze this theoretical possibility, we partnered with a senior citizens’ organization: The University of the Third Age (U3A). Within DRR, senior citizens are often portrayed as inherently vulnerable; while within the aging literature, loneliness and isolation are shown to be key detriments to “successful aging”. The relationship-building methodology, then, aligns with both community engagement and successful aging literatures, enabling an analysis of targeted spillovers related to risk reduction actions and successful aging. Engagements on the topic of flood risk were analyzed to determine whether they had spillover effects on participants’ flood risk actions or on their successful aging outcomes. Findings from 45 remote survey-interviews and 30 follow-up engagements demonstrate that relationship building is an enjoyable form of community engagement able to promote learning, skill development, and intellectual risk-taking (i.e., elements of successful aging). In addition to successful aging, relationship building also contributed to household flood risk reduction behaviors, as well as initiating spillovers to non-participants. These exploratory findings suggest an under-accounted impact of participatory flood risk reduction, which suggests a need to broaden the measurement of “impacts” to include the benefits that spillover to other risk contexts and/or to other individuals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evolution of the NMME Rainfall Seasonal Forecasting over Central Africa Are You Watching or Warning? the Role of Comprehension, Warning Lead Time and Prior Experience On Individual Preparation of Tornadic Events “Gentle Disruptions”: A Critical Reflection on Participatory Arts in Expanding the Language System for Meaningful Community Engagement Around Local Climate Adaptation Creating Fire-Adapted Communities Through Recovery: Case Studies from the United States and Australia Planning and Warning as Capacity in Island Communities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1