{"title":"欧洲法院努力解决私人复制和网络电视转播相互交织的本质","authors":"Giulia Priora, Amanda Costa Novaes","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpad075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In Ocilion, the Court of Justice of the European Union ruled on two intricated aspects of the relationship between copyright law and Internet TV services, clarifying that de-duplication systems of copying of TV broadcasts do not fall within the scope of the private copying exception and that facilitating online retransmission does not amount to a communication to the public.","PeriodicalId":44529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","volume":"236 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CJEU grapples with the intertwined nature of private copies and retransmission of online television broadcasts\",\"authors\":\"Giulia Priora, Amanda Costa Novaes\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jiplp/jpad075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In Ocilion, the Court of Justice of the European Union ruled on two intricated aspects of the relationship between copyright law and Internet TV services, clarifying that de-duplication systems of copying of TV broadcasts do not fall within the scope of the private copying exception and that facilitating online retransmission does not amount to a communication to the public.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice\",\"volume\":\"236 1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpad075\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpad075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
CJEU grapples with the intertwined nature of private copies and retransmission of online television broadcasts
Abstract In Ocilion, the Court of Justice of the European Union ruled on two intricated aspects of the relationship between copyright law and Internet TV services, clarifying that de-duplication systems of copying of TV broadcasts do not fall within the scope of the private copying exception and that facilitating online retransmission does not amount to a communication to the public.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
