土耳其适应与医学性别意识量表Nıjmegen的心理测量特性:效度与Relıability的评估

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Konuralp Tip Dergisi Pub Date : 2023-10-17 DOI:10.18521/ktd.1294869
İmran Gökçen YILMAZ KARAMAN, Cennet YASTIBAŞ, Ali Ercan ALTINÖZ, İrem Naz ÖRNEKEL, Muzaffer BİLGİN, Gulcan GULEC
{"title":"土耳其适应与医学性别意识量表Nıjmegen的心理测量特性:效度与Relıability的评估","authors":"İmran Gökçen YILMAZ KARAMAN, Cennet YASTIBAŞ, Ali Ercan ALTINÖZ, İrem Naz ÖRNEKEL, Muzaffer BİLGİN, Gulcan GULEC","doi":"10.18521/ktd.1294869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Gender affects how we serve and receive medical care. World Health Organization evaluates gender as a social determinant of health. However, a knowledge gap exists among physicians. The present study aims to adapt Nijmegen Gender in Medicine Awareness Scale (N-GAMS) in the Turkish language and define Turkish medical students’ gender awareness level and related factors.
 Methods: Two hundred seventy-two medical students participated. The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory, Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy- Student Version, and N-GAMS were utilized to collect data; in addition to sociodemographic form.
 Results: Confirmatory factor analysis repeated a three-factor structure, as previously demonstrated. The Cronbach’s alpha of the Turkish N-GAMS was 0.887. Criteria-related validity analysis resulted as follows: Gender sensitivity was associated with higher empathy and higher benevolent sexism. Gender role ideology toward patients scores were related to the male sex, lower empathy, and higher levels of sexist attitudes regarding both hostile and benevolent types. Gender role ideology toward doctors was higher in male students, in those with lower empathy, and in ambivalent sexism. Turkish medical students in our sample were less gender-sensitive than their European counterparts.
 Conclusion: N-GAMS is valid and reliable among Turkish medical students. There is a need for training in gender awareness in medical faculties.","PeriodicalId":17884,"journal":{"name":"Konuralp Tip Dergisi","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Turkish Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of Nıjmegen Gender Awareness in Medicine Scale: Assessment of Validity and Relıability\",\"authors\":\"İmran Gökçen YILMAZ KARAMAN, Cennet YASTIBAŞ, Ali Ercan ALTINÖZ, İrem Naz ÖRNEKEL, Muzaffer BİLGİN, Gulcan GULEC\",\"doi\":\"10.18521/ktd.1294869\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Gender affects how we serve and receive medical care. World Health Organization evaluates gender as a social determinant of health. However, a knowledge gap exists among physicians. The present study aims to adapt Nijmegen Gender in Medicine Awareness Scale (N-GAMS) in the Turkish language and define Turkish medical students’ gender awareness level and related factors.
 Methods: Two hundred seventy-two medical students participated. The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory, Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy- Student Version, and N-GAMS were utilized to collect data; in addition to sociodemographic form.
 Results: Confirmatory factor analysis repeated a three-factor structure, as previously demonstrated. The Cronbach’s alpha of the Turkish N-GAMS was 0.887. Criteria-related validity analysis resulted as follows: Gender sensitivity was associated with higher empathy and higher benevolent sexism. Gender role ideology toward patients scores were related to the male sex, lower empathy, and higher levels of sexist attitudes regarding both hostile and benevolent types. Gender role ideology toward doctors was higher in male students, in those with lower empathy, and in ambivalent sexism. Turkish medical students in our sample were less gender-sensitive than their European counterparts.
 Conclusion: N-GAMS is valid and reliable among Turkish medical students. There is a need for training in gender awareness in medical faculties.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Konuralp Tip Dergisi\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Konuralp Tip Dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18521/ktd.1294869\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Konuralp Tip Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18521/ktd.1294869","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:性别影响我们服务和接受医疗服务的方式。世界卫生组织评价性别是健康的一个社会决定因素。然而,医生之间存在知识差距。本研究拟采用土耳其语版奈梅亨医学性别意识量表(N-GAMS),明确土耳其医学生的性别意识水平及相关因素。 方法:对272名医学生进行调查。采用矛盾性别歧视量表、杰弗逊医生共情量表-学生版、N-GAMS量表收集数据;除了社会人口统计形式之外。 结果:验证性因子分析重复三因素结构,如前所述。土耳其N-GAMS的Cronbach 's alpha为0.887。效度分析结果显示:性别敏感与较高的共情和较高的善意性别歧视相关。对患者的性别角色意识形态得分与男性、较低的同理心和较高的敌意和仁慈类型的性别歧视态度有关。对医生的性别角色意识在男学生、低同理心学生和矛盾性别歧视学生中较高。在我们的样本中,土耳其医科学生的性别敏感性低于欧洲同行。 结论:N-GAMS在土耳其医学生中是有效可靠的。有必要对医务人员进行性别意识方面的培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Turkish Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of Nıjmegen Gender Awareness in Medicine Scale: Assessment of Validity and Relıability
Objective: Gender affects how we serve and receive medical care. World Health Organization evaluates gender as a social determinant of health. However, a knowledge gap exists among physicians. The present study aims to adapt Nijmegen Gender in Medicine Awareness Scale (N-GAMS) in the Turkish language and define Turkish medical students’ gender awareness level and related factors. Methods: Two hundred seventy-two medical students participated. The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory, Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy- Student Version, and N-GAMS were utilized to collect data; in addition to sociodemographic form. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis repeated a three-factor structure, as previously demonstrated. The Cronbach’s alpha of the Turkish N-GAMS was 0.887. Criteria-related validity analysis resulted as follows: Gender sensitivity was associated with higher empathy and higher benevolent sexism. Gender role ideology toward patients scores were related to the male sex, lower empathy, and higher levels of sexist attitudes regarding both hostile and benevolent types. Gender role ideology toward doctors was higher in male students, in those with lower empathy, and in ambivalent sexism. Turkish medical students in our sample were less gender-sensitive than their European counterparts. Conclusion: N-GAMS is valid and reliable among Turkish medical students. There is a need for training in gender awareness in medical faculties.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Konuralp Tip Dergisi
Konuralp Tip Dergisi MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
期刊最新文献
Obstrüktif Uyku Apnede (OUA) Ortalama Trombosit Hacmi (OTH) ve OUA'da Sürekli Pozitif Hava Yolu Basıncı (CPAP) Tedavisinin OTH Üzerine Etkisi A Quasi-Experimental Controlled Educational Intervention for Mothers To Reduce Unnecessary Emergency Department Admissions in Children with Respiratory Tract Infection Symptoms Evaluation of Serum Annexin A1 Values in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Turkish Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of Nıjmegen Gender Awareness in Medicine Scale: Assessment of Validity and Relıability Prematür Ejakülasyon Tanılı Bireylerde Karar Verme ve Dürtüselliğin Değerlendirilmesi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1