马克思和恩格斯对后资本主义未来的预测:时间的考验

E. V. Krasnikova
{"title":"马克思和恩格斯对后资本主义未来的预测:时间的考验","authors":"E. V. Krasnikova","doi":"10.38050/2078-3809-2023-15-3-7-28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The modern world has entered a complex controversial era of changing economic systems, clearly visible in a variety of new phenomena. These include the completion of industrialization in developed countries with the development of the third industrial revolution and the entry into the era of technology development of the Fourth industrial revolution. Such a change resolves the fundamental contradiction of capitalism that has reached a critical level, in the author's interpretation, on the side of the productive forces acting as an environmental crisis, on the side of industrial relations – inequality in income and property. In the era of changing economic systems, it is appropriate to ask a question about the relevance of classical forecasts regarding the future of capitalism, and there are two such in their scientific heritage. The first of them is the well–known socialist one, set out in the Manifesto of the Communist Party, published in 1848, and, on the contrary, the forecast about the «transformation of the capitalist mode of production into an associated one,» which Marx outlined very succinctly, but clearly and unambiguously in the third volume of Capital. The followers of the classics picked up the first forecast, contrary to their expectations, which never took place in the history of capitalism in developed countries, addressed directly to them by the classics, but implemented in semi-feudal Russia. However, the age of socialism turned out to be short-lived in it, but the reasons for its fleeting death are not fully realized to this day. And on the contrary, the second forecast took place: capitalism underwent such a transformation at the stage of mastering the second industrial revolution and even more – the third. Let's try to figure out how popular a socialist forecast can be in modern conditions. This is also relevant in view of the steady increase in state ownership, which abolishes the monopoly of private ownership forms inherent in capitalism and contributes to the increasing role of the state as a macroeconomic entity.","PeriodicalId":489478,"journal":{"name":"Naučnye issledovaniâ èkonomičeskogo fakulʹteta","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forecasts of K. Marx and F. Engels on the Post-Capitalist Future: The Test of Time\",\"authors\":\"E. V. Krasnikova\",\"doi\":\"10.38050/2078-3809-2023-15-3-7-28\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The modern world has entered a complex controversial era of changing economic systems, clearly visible in a variety of new phenomena. These include the completion of industrialization in developed countries with the development of the third industrial revolution and the entry into the era of technology development of the Fourth industrial revolution. Such a change resolves the fundamental contradiction of capitalism that has reached a critical level, in the author's interpretation, on the side of the productive forces acting as an environmental crisis, on the side of industrial relations – inequality in income and property. In the era of changing economic systems, it is appropriate to ask a question about the relevance of classical forecasts regarding the future of capitalism, and there are two such in their scientific heritage. The first of them is the well–known socialist one, set out in the Manifesto of the Communist Party, published in 1848, and, on the contrary, the forecast about the «transformation of the capitalist mode of production into an associated one,» which Marx outlined very succinctly, but clearly and unambiguously in the third volume of Capital. The followers of the classics picked up the first forecast, contrary to their expectations, which never took place in the history of capitalism in developed countries, addressed directly to them by the classics, but implemented in semi-feudal Russia. However, the age of socialism turned out to be short-lived in it, but the reasons for its fleeting death are not fully realized to this day. And on the contrary, the second forecast took place: capitalism underwent such a transformation at the stage of mastering the second industrial revolution and even more – the third. Let's try to figure out how popular a socialist forecast can be in modern conditions. This is also relevant in view of the steady increase in state ownership, which abolishes the monopoly of private ownership forms inherent in capitalism and contributes to the increasing role of the state as a macroeconomic entity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":489478,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Naučnye issledovaniâ èkonomičeskogo fakulʹteta\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Naučnye issledovaniâ èkonomičeskogo fakulʹteta\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.38050/2078-3809-2023-15-3-7-28\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Naučnye issledovaniâ èkonomičeskogo fakulʹteta","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38050/2078-3809-2023-15-3-7-28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现代世界已经进入了一个复杂而有争议的经济体系变化时代,这在各种新现象中清晰可见。这包括随着第三次工业革命的发展,发达国家完成了工业化,第四次工业革命进入了技术发展时代。这种变化解决了资本主义的根本矛盾,在作者的解释中,在作为环境危机的生产力方面,在劳资关系方面-收入和财产的不平等方面,已经达到了一个关键的水平。在经济体系不断变化的时代,我们有必要提出一个问题,即关于资本主义未来的经典预测的相关性,在他们的科学遗产中有两个这样的问题。第一个是著名的社会主义预言,载于1848年出版的《共产党宣言》中;另一个是相反的预言,关于“资本主义生产方式向相关联的生产方式的转变”,马克思在《资本论》第三卷中非常简洁、清晰、明确地概述了这一点。经典的追随者接受了第一个预测,这与他们的期望相反,这在发达国家的资本主义历史上从未发生过,由经典直接针对他们,但在半封建的俄罗斯实现了。然而,社会主义时代在中国是短暂的,但其短暂死亡的原因至今没有完全认识到。相反,第二个预测发生了:资本主义在掌握第二次工业革命甚至第三次工业革命的阶段经历了这样的转变。让我们试着弄清楚,在现代条件下,社会主义预测能有多受欢迎。鉴于国家所有权的稳步增长,这也与此相关,这废除了资本主义固有的私有制形式的垄断,并有助于国家作为宏观经济实体的作用日益增强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Forecasts of K. Marx and F. Engels on the Post-Capitalist Future: The Test of Time
The modern world has entered a complex controversial era of changing economic systems, clearly visible in a variety of new phenomena. These include the completion of industrialization in developed countries with the development of the third industrial revolution and the entry into the era of technology development of the Fourth industrial revolution. Such a change resolves the fundamental contradiction of capitalism that has reached a critical level, in the author's interpretation, on the side of the productive forces acting as an environmental crisis, on the side of industrial relations – inequality in income and property. In the era of changing economic systems, it is appropriate to ask a question about the relevance of classical forecasts regarding the future of capitalism, and there are two such in their scientific heritage. The first of them is the well–known socialist one, set out in the Manifesto of the Communist Party, published in 1848, and, on the contrary, the forecast about the «transformation of the capitalist mode of production into an associated one,» which Marx outlined very succinctly, but clearly and unambiguously in the third volume of Capital. The followers of the classics picked up the first forecast, contrary to their expectations, which never took place in the history of capitalism in developed countries, addressed directly to them by the classics, but implemented in semi-feudal Russia. However, the age of socialism turned out to be short-lived in it, but the reasons for its fleeting death are not fully realized to this day. And on the contrary, the second forecast took place: capitalism underwent such a transformation at the stage of mastering the second industrial revolution and even more – the third. Let's try to figure out how popular a socialist forecast can be in modern conditions. This is also relevant in view of the steady increase in state ownership, which abolishes the monopoly of private ownership forms inherent in capitalism and contributes to the increasing role of the state as a macroeconomic entity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Islamic Banking: the Term, Factors of Formation and Prerequisites for Development in Russia Forecast of the demographic dividend dy- namics in Russia: influence of the pension reform and the pandemic. Material and Non-material Motivation of Young Professionals in the Gas Industry Permission or Prohibition of Vertical Integration: the Experience of the Russian Freight Rail and Power Industry Russian Leviathan through the Prism of the Modified Conception of “Narrow Corridor”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1