Haleema Parveen, Zainab Kausar Khan, Ayesha Nazish, Farzana Kosir, Abid Hussain, Abdul Waheed
{"title":"了解癫痫患者的污名化、心理负担和生活质量","authors":"Haleema Parveen, Zainab Kausar Khan, Ayesha Nazish, Farzana Kosir, Abid Hussain, Abdul Waheed","doi":"10.61506/02.00012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current study was conducted to investigate the impact of perceived stigma and psychological burden on the quality of life among the patients of epilepsy. Sample of 560 (male=221, female=339 epileptic patients were selected through purposive sampling technique from Nishtar Hospital Multan and Combined Military Hospital Multan. Findings showed that perception of stigma, depression, anxiety and stress have a significant positive correlation. Stigma is a significant positive predictor of psychological burden. Results also indicate that stigma and psychological burden are significant negative predictors of quality of life. Significant differences were found in the demographic variable gender on stigmatization, psychological burden and quality of life. Stigma, depression, anxiety and stress are significantly higher in female epileptic patients as compared to male and has a detrimental effect on the patient’s quality of life, recovery, and prognosis. Thus, there is undoubtedly a need to address psychological issues, most notably the stigma associated with illnesses. Psychologists, psychiatrists, other physicians, and care givers of epileptic patients must pay close attention to the stigma in this patient population.","PeriodicalId":46316,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Policy Research in Tourism Leisure and Events","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding Stigmatization, Psychological Burden and Quality of Life among Patients of Epilepsy\",\"authors\":\"Haleema Parveen, Zainab Kausar Khan, Ayesha Nazish, Farzana Kosir, Abid Hussain, Abdul Waheed\",\"doi\":\"10.61506/02.00012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The current study was conducted to investigate the impact of perceived stigma and psychological burden on the quality of life among the patients of epilepsy. Sample of 560 (male=221, female=339 epileptic patients were selected through purposive sampling technique from Nishtar Hospital Multan and Combined Military Hospital Multan. Findings showed that perception of stigma, depression, anxiety and stress have a significant positive correlation. Stigma is a significant positive predictor of psychological burden. Results also indicate that stigma and psychological burden are significant negative predictors of quality of life. Significant differences were found in the demographic variable gender on stigmatization, psychological burden and quality of life. Stigma, depression, anxiety and stress are significantly higher in female epileptic patients as compared to male and has a detrimental effect on the patient’s quality of life, recovery, and prognosis. Thus, there is undoubtedly a need to address psychological issues, most notably the stigma associated with illnesses. Psychologists, psychiatrists, other physicians, and care givers of epileptic patients must pay close attention to the stigma in this patient population.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Policy Research in Tourism Leisure and Events\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Policy Research in Tourism Leisure and Events\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.61506/02.00012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Policy Research in Tourism Leisure and Events","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61506/02.00012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Understanding Stigmatization, Psychological Burden and Quality of Life among Patients of Epilepsy
The current study was conducted to investigate the impact of perceived stigma and psychological burden on the quality of life among the patients of epilepsy. Sample of 560 (male=221, female=339 epileptic patients were selected through purposive sampling technique from Nishtar Hospital Multan and Combined Military Hospital Multan. Findings showed that perception of stigma, depression, anxiety and stress have a significant positive correlation. Stigma is a significant positive predictor of psychological burden. Results also indicate that stigma and psychological burden are significant negative predictors of quality of life. Significant differences were found in the demographic variable gender on stigmatization, psychological burden and quality of life. Stigma, depression, anxiety and stress are significantly higher in female epileptic patients as compared to male and has a detrimental effect on the patient’s quality of life, recovery, and prognosis. Thus, there is undoubtedly a need to address psychological issues, most notably the stigma associated with illnesses. Psychologists, psychiatrists, other physicians, and care givers of epileptic patients must pay close attention to the stigma in this patient population.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure & Events provides a unique forum for critical discussion of public policy debates relating to the fields of tourism, leisure and events. This encompasses the economic, social, cultural, political and environmental dimensions of official intervention. In addition to high quality theoretical and empirical papers, the journal publishes contributions examining the value of contrasting methodologies, or advocacy of novel methods. Inter- and multi-disciplinary submissions are particularly welcome. In order to foster debate and extend the scope of discussion, it publishes shorter carefully argued position statements on specific, topical interventions in the Contemporary Policy Debates section. In addition, the journal’s novel Dialogues section involves ‘point/counter-point’ debates between contributors on a range of policy-related or policy research-related topics. These may interrogate key concepts from different cultural, theoretical or spatial perspectives, or discuss potential responses to a range of practical challenges involved in undertaking policy-related research in the fields of tourism, leisure and events. With a swiftly growing academic reputation, the journal is ‘B’ rated by the Australian Business Deans Council (ABDC). It has received citations from a number of senior practitioners and influential bodies, including the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).