专家在法庭上的解释

Leonid A. Zashlyapin
{"title":"专家在法庭上的解释","authors":"Leonid A. Zashlyapin","doi":"10.37399/issn2072-909x.2023.9.86-94","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the problem of the impossibility of constructing criminal procedural relations in a judicial interrogation of an expert. In the judicial interrogation of an expert, there is a subjective right of authorized persons to ask questions to an expert (to interrogate an expert) and a subjective right of an expert to answer questions (to testify). Forensic interrogation of an expert can be replaced by an expert’s explanation, which involves communication between the expert and the participants in the judicial investigation in the form of a dialogue.","PeriodicalId":487513,"journal":{"name":"Российское правосудие","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Explanation of an Expert in Court\",\"authors\":\"Leonid A. Zashlyapin\",\"doi\":\"10.37399/issn2072-909x.2023.9.86-94\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article is devoted to the problem of the impossibility of constructing criminal procedural relations in a judicial interrogation of an expert. In the judicial interrogation of an expert, there is a subjective right of authorized persons to ask questions to an expert (to interrogate an expert) and a subjective right of an expert to answer questions (to testify). Forensic interrogation of an expert can be replaced by an expert’s explanation, which involves communication between the expert and the participants in the judicial investigation in the form of a dialogue.\",\"PeriodicalId\":487513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Российское правосудие\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Российское правосудие\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37399/issn2072-909x.2023.9.86-94\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Российское правосудие","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37399/issn2072-909x.2023.9.86-94","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了在司法讯问鉴定人过程中,刑事诉讼关系建构的不可能性问题。在对专家的司法讯问中,被授权人有向专家提问(讯问专家)的主观权利,也有专家回答问题(作证)的主观权利。可以用专家解释代替专家的法医讯问,这涉及到专家与司法侦查参与人之间以对话的形式进行沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Explanation of an Expert in Court
The article is devoted to the problem of the impossibility of constructing criminal procedural relations in a judicial interrogation of an expert. In the judicial interrogation of an expert, there is a subjective right of authorized persons to ask questions to an expert (to interrogate an expert) and a subjective right of an expert to answer questions (to testify). Forensic interrogation of an expert can be replaced by an expert’s explanation, which involves communication between the expert and the participants in the judicial investigation in the form of a dialogue.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Features of Recovery of Losses from Shadow Management in the Framework of a Bankruptcy Case Modernization of Criminal Legislation in the Context of Criminalization of Responsibility for Social and Domestic Violence Termination Indemnity is a Universal Way of Cease of Obligations in Russian Civil Law On Responsibility for the Dissemination of Knowingly False Information and Discrediting the Use of the Armed Forces: A Comparative Analysis Actual Issues of Realization of the Right to Defense at the Stage of Initiation of a Criminal Case
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1