成人注意缺陷/多动障碍临床实践指南中的利益冲突管理

IF 0.2 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Psychiatric Annals Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.3928/00485713-20230911-03
Thomas J. Spencer, Olivia Descorbeth, Frances R. Levin
{"title":"成人注意缺陷/多动障碍临床实践指南中的利益冲突管理","authors":"Thomas J. Spencer, Olivia Descorbeth, Frances R. Levin","doi":"10.3928/00485713-20230911-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) require skilled contributors who may have conflicts of interest (COI) that need to be assessed and managed to minimize possible biased influence. Different organizations have unique COI management policies depending on their available expertise, circumstances, and judgment. To inform the development of the American Professional Society of ADHD and Related Disorders (APSARD) COI management procedures, we reviewed the literature. Because there are no CPGs for adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in the United States, we reviewed COI management policies of related CPGs with a focus on ADHD. There were many common elements, including matching levels of permitted involvement with type of COI. Examples included withdrawals from industry activities and limitations on participation in discussions, deliberations, and/or voting on specific matters. Due to the complexities of COIs, it is impossible to fully operationalize COI management. Ultimately, management of COIs is determined after review by the co-chairs and steering committee in discussion with the task force member. [ Psychiatr Ann . 2023;53(10):455–460.]","PeriodicalId":20917,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric Annals","volume":"280 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conflict of Interest Management in Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Clinical Practice Guidelines\",\"authors\":\"Thomas J. Spencer, Olivia Descorbeth, Frances R. Levin\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/00485713-20230911-03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) require skilled contributors who may have conflicts of interest (COI) that need to be assessed and managed to minimize possible biased influence. Different organizations have unique COI management policies depending on their available expertise, circumstances, and judgment. To inform the development of the American Professional Society of ADHD and Related Disorders (APSARD) COI management procedures, we reviewed the literature. Because there are no CPGs for adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in the United States, we reviewed COI management policies of related CPGs with a focus on ADHD. There were many common elements, including matching levels of permitted involvement with type of COI. Examples included withdrawals from industry activities and limitations on participation in discussions, deliberations, and/or voting on specific matters. Due to the complexities of COIs, it is impossible to fully operationalize COI management. Ultimately, management of COIs is determined after review by the co-chairs and steering committee in discussion with the task force member. [ Psychiatr Ann . 2023;53(10):455–460.]\",\"PeriodicalId\":20917,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatric Annals\",\"volume\":\"280 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatric Annals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/00485713-20230911-03\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric Annals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/00485713-20230911-03","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

临床实践指南(cpg)需要熟练的贡献者,他们可能有利益冲突(COI),需要进行评估和管理,以尽量减少可能的偏见影响。不同的组织有独特的COI管理策略,这取决于他们可用的专业知识、环境和判断。为了了解美国ADHD及相关障碍专业协会(APSARD) COI管理程序的发展,我们回顾了文献。由于美国没有针对成人注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)的cpg,我们回顾了相关cpg的COI管理政策,重点是ADHD。有许多共同的元素,包括与COI类型相匹配的允许参与程度。例子包括退出行业活动和限制参与讨论、审议和/或对具体事项的投票。由于COI的复杂性,完全实施COI管理是不可能的。最终,coi的管理是在联合主席和指导委员会与工作组成员讨论后审查确定的。[精神病医生安。]2023; 53(10): 455 - 460。)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Conflict of Interest Management in Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Clinical Practice Guidelines
Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) require skilled contributors who may have conflicts of interest (COI) that need to be assessed and managed to minimize possible biased influence. Different organizations have unique COI management policies depending on their available expertise, circumstances, and judgment. To inform the development of the American Professional Society of ADHD and Related Disorders (APSARD) COI management procedures, we reviewed the literature. Because there are no CPGs for adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in the United States, we reviewed COI management policies of related CPGs with a focus on ADHD. There were many common elements, including matching levels of permitted involvement with type of COI. Examples included withdrawals from industry activities and limitations on participation in discussions, deliberations, and/or voting on specific matters. Due to the complexities of COIs, it is impossible to fully operationalize COI management. Ultimately, management of COIs is determined after review by the co-chairs and steering committee in discussion with the task force member. [ Psychiatr Ann . 2023;53(10):455–460.]
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatric Annals
Psychiatric Annals PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
期刊最新文献
Physician Coaching: An Intervention to Address the Burnout Gender Gap Among Physicians The Times, They Are a-Changing at Psychiatric Annals The Relationship Between Dyadic Coping Strategies and Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms in Pregnant Persons at Risk of Miscarriage A SAFER Workplace: Broadening Peer Support Programs Promoting Workforce Well-Being
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1