在网络和邮件调查中显示电池项目:网格vs逐项,无线电vs宽按钮

IF 2.4 4区 管理学 Q3 BUSINESS International Journal of Market Research Pub Date : 2023-10-28 DOI:10.1177/14707853231210223
Kristen Olson, Jolene D Smyth, Angelica Phillips
{"title":"在网络和邮件调查中显示电池项目:网格vs逐项,无线电vs宽按钮","authors":"Kristen Olson, Jolene D Smyth, Angelica Phillips","doi":"10.1177/14707853231210223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How to display questions that are part of a battery in self-administered surveys is an important decision. Battery items may be displayed in a grid in a mail survey or computer web survey, but are often displayed as individual items on mobile devices. Although past research has compared grids to item-by-item displays in computer and mobile web surveys, almost no work has compared these displays in mail surveys. Additionally, many web survey templates use wide rectangular buttons to select response options in individual items using a mobile-optimized design, different from the standard round answer space format typically used in mail surveys. In this study, we experimentally test grid versus item-by-item displays and round radio buttons versus wide rectangular buttons for battery items in a probability-based general population mixed-mode mail + web survey of adults in Nebraska. Consistent with past research, we find that item-by-item displays reduce straightlining rates compared to grid designs. We also find that respondents are less likely to select the last two response categories in the item-by-item displays than in the grid displays. Smartphone and computer web respondents have higher item nonresponse rates than mail respondents, and web respondents have lower straightlining rates than mail respondents, accounting for respondent characteristics. Reassuringly, there is no difference in data quality outcomes across radio button versus wide button formats. These findings replicate past research that item-by-item displays reduce straightlining but may shift answer categories. These findings suggest that questionnaire designers can combine round radio button answer spaces on mail surveys with wide buttons on web surveys on battery items with little difference in data quality.","PeriodicalId":47641,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Market Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Display of battery items in web and mail surveys: Grids versus item-by-item and radio versus wide buttons\",\"authors\":\"Kristen Olson, Jolene D Smyth, Angelica Phillips\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14707853231210223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"How to display questions that are part of a battery in self-administered surveys is an important decision. Battery items may be displayed in a grid in a mail survey or computer web survey, but are often displayed as individual items on mobile devices. Although past research has compared grids to item-by-item displays in computer and mobile web surveys, almost no work has compared these displays in mail surveys. Additionally, many web survey templates use wide rectangular buttons to select response options in individual items using a mobile-optimized design, different from the standard round answer space format typically used in mail surveys. In this study, we experimentally test grid versus item-by-item displays and round radio buttons versus wide rectangular buttons for battery items in a probability-based general population mixed-mode mail + web survey of adults in Nebraska. Consistent with past research, we find that item-by-item displays reduce straightlining rates compared to grid designs. We also find that respondents are less likely to select the last two response categories in the item-by-item displays than in the grid displays. Smartphone and computer web respondents have higher item nonresponse rates than mail respondents, and web respondents have lower straightlining rates than mail respondents, accounting for respondent characteristics. Reassuringly, there is no difference in data quality outcomes across radio button versus wide button formats. These findings replicate past research that item-by-item displays reduce straightlining but may shift answer categories. These findings suggest that questionnaire designers can combine round radio button answer spaces on mail surveys with wide buttons on web surveys on battery items with little difference in data quality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47641,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Market Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Market Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14707853231210223\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Market Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14707853231210223","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如何在自我管理调查中显示问题是一个重要的决定。在邮件调查或计算机网络调查中,电池项目可能显示在网格中,但在移动设备上通常显示为单个项目。尽管过去的研究将网格与计算机和移动网络调查中的逐项显示进行了比较,但几乎没有研究将这些显示与邮件调查进行了比较。此外,许多网络调查模板使用宽矩形按钮来选择单个项目的回答选项,使用移动优化设计,不同于通常在邮件调查中使用的标准圆形回答空间格式。在这项研究中,我们对内布拉斯加州成年人进行了基于概率的一般人群混合模式邮件+网络调查,实验测试了网格与逐项显示,圆形单选按钮与宽矩形按钮的电池项目。与过去的研究一致,我们发现与网格设计相比,逐项显示降低了直线率。我们还发现,与网格显示相比,受访者在逐项显示中选择最后两个响应类别的可能性更小。智能手机和电脑网络受访者的项目不回复率高于邮件受访者,而网络受访者的直言率低于邮件受访者,这说明了受访者的特点。令人放心的是,单选按钮与宽按钮格式之间的数据质量结果没有差异。这些发现重复了过去的研究,即逐项显示减少了简单性,但可能会改变答案类别。这些发现表明,问卷设计者可以将邮件调查中的圆形单选按钮与网络调查中关于电池项目的宽按钮结合起来,数据质量几乎没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Display of battery items in web and mail surveys: Grids versus item-by-item and radio versus wide buttons
How to display questions that are part of a battery in self-administered surveys is an important decision. Battery items may be displayed in a grid in a mail survey or computer web survey, but are often displayed as individual items on mobile devices. Although past research has compared grids to item-by-item displays in computer and mobile web surveys, almost no work has compared these displays in mail surveys. Additionally, many web survey templates use wide rectangular buttons to select response options in individual items using a mobile-optimized design, different from the standard round answer space format typically used in mail surveys. In this study, we experimentally test grid versus item-by-item displays and round radio buttons versus wide rectangular buttons for battery items in a probability-based general population mixed-mode mail + web survey of adults in Nebraska. Consistent with past research, we find that item-by-item displays reduce straightlining rates compared to grid designs. We also find that respondents are less likely to select the last two response categories in the item-by-item displays than in the grid displays. Smartphone and computer web respondents have higher item nonresponse rates than mail respondents, and web respondents have lower straightlining rates than mail respondents, accounting for respondent characteristics. Reassuringly, there is no difference in data quality outcomes across radio button versus wide button formats. These findings replicate past research that item-by-item displays reduce straightlining but may shift answer categories. These findings suggest that questionnaire designers can combine round radio button answer spaces on mail surveys with wide buttons on web surveys on battery items with little difference in data quality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Market Research is the essential professional aid for users and providers of market research. IJMR will help you to: KEEP abreast of cutting-edge developments APPLY new research approaches to your business UNDERSTAND new tools and techniques LEARN from the world’s leading research thinkers STAY at the forefront of your profession
期刊最新文献
Examining stated improvement research methods Marketing Outcomes and Shareholder Value: A Review and Research Agenda Measuring prime ministerial brands: Exploring Needham’s framework for assessing the UK’s Boris Johnson and the Greek konstantinos mitsotakis Machine learning based methods for ratemaking health care insurance When “the more the better”? Mindfulness enhances the effect of the number of displayed product features in short video ADs on purchase intention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1