将社区发展方法纳入地方系统以解决卫生不平等问题:范围审查

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 Q3 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Community Development Journal Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1093/cdj/bsad017
Elizabeth Walters, Gail Findlay, Katherine Curtis-Tyler, Angela Harden
{"title":"将社区发展方法纳入地方系统以解决卫生不平等问题:范围审查","authors":"Elizabeth Walters, Gail Findlay, Katherine Curtis-Tyler, Angela Harden","doi":"10.1093/cdj/bsad017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background There is a growing evidence base which shows that community development can make an important contribution to reducing health inequalities, but embedding community development as a mainstream approach into local systems is challenging. The literature relevant to the question of how to embed community development approaches is reviewed in this paper. Methods Using guidance from the Joanna Briggs Institute, a scoping review was carried out to identify relevant literature. Systematic searches were carried out across multiple databases, experts in the field were contacted and references of included studies were screened. Search results were screened against exclusion criteria. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used as a framework to identify factors hindering or supporting embedding. Findings The review identified thirty-five documents which described embedded, or attempts to embed, community development approaches in fourteen different countries. The most common community development approaches were strength-based or co-production. Four studies reported primary research on the embedding process or systems change. Several barriers and facilitators to embedding were identified including those related to funding arrangements, organizational and system culture, building trust with communities and the need for training and support for staff. Conclusion Using an implementation science framework, this scoping review has assessed the nature of the evidence base on how to embed community development. While the evidence base uncovered is currently limited, barriers and facilitators to embedding identified in the review can be used to both inform future attempts to embed community development and provide the building blocks for future primary research.","PeriodicalId":47329,"journal":{"name":"Community Development Journal","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Embedding community development approaches in local systems to address health inequalities: a scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Walters, Gail Findlay, Katherine Curtis-Tyler, Angela Harden\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/cdj/bsad017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background There is a growing evidence base which shows that community development can make an important contribution to reducing health inequalities, but embedding community development as a mainstream approach into local systems is challenging. The literature relevant to the question of how to embed community development approaches is reviewed in this paper. Methods Using guidance from the Joanna Briggs Institute, a scoping review was carried out to identify relevant literature. Systematic searches were carried out across multiple databases, experts in the field were contacted and references of included studies were screened. Search results were screened against exclusion criteria. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used as a framework to identify factors hindering or supporting embedding. Findings The review identified thirty-five documents which described embedded, or attempts to embed, community development approaches in fourteen different countries. The most common community development approaches were strength-based or co-production. Four studies reported primary research on the embedding process or systems change. Several barriers and facilitators to embedding were identified including those related to funding arrangements, organizational and system culture, building trust with communities and the need for training and support for staff. Conclusion Using an implementation science framework, this scoping review has assessed the nature of the evidence base on how to embed community development. While the evidence base uncovered is currently limited, barriers and facilitators to embedding identified in the review can be used to both inform future attempts to embed community development and provide the building blocks for future primary research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Community Development Journal\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Community Development Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsad017\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community Development Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsad017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

越来越多的证据表明,社区发展可以为减少卫生不平等做出重要贡献,但将社区发展作为一种主流方法纳入地方系统是具有挑战性的。本文回顾了与如何嵌入社区发展方法相关的文献。方法在乔安娜布里格斯研究所的指导下,进行范围审查,以确定相关文献。在多个数据库中进行了系统检索,联系了该领域的专家,筛选了纳入研究的参考文献。根据排除标准筛选搜索结果。实施研究综合框架被用作确定阻碍或支持嵌入的因素的框架。审查确定了35份文件,这些文件描述了在14个不同国家嵌入或试图嵌入社区发展方法。最常见的社区发展方法是以力量为基础或共同生产。四项研究报告了对嵌入过程或系统变化的初步研究。确定了若干妨碍嵌入工作的障碍和促进因素,包括与供资安排、组织和系统文化、与社区建立信任以及对工作人员进行培训和支助的需要有关的障碍和促进因素。利用实施科学框架,本范围审查评估了如何嵌入社区发展的证据基础的性质。虽然目前发现的证据基础有限,但在审查中确定的嵌入障碍和促进因素可用于为未来嵌入社区发展的尝试提供信息,并为未来的初级研究提供构建块。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Embedding community development approaches in local systems to address health inequalities: a scoping review
Abstract Background There is a growing evidence base which shows that community development can make an important contribution to reducing health inequalities, but embedding community development as a mainstream approach into local systems is challenging. The literature relevant to the question of how to embed community development approaches is reviewed in this paper. Methods Using guidance from the Joanna Briggs Institute, a scoping review was carried out to identify relevant literature. Systematic searches were carried out across multiple databases, experts in the field were contacted and references of included studies were screened. Search results were screened against exclusion criteria. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used as a framework to identify factors hindering or supporting embedding. Findings The review identified thirty-five documents which described embedded, or attempts to embed, community development approaches in fourteen different countries. The most common community development approaches were strength-based or co-production. Four studies reported primary research on the embedding process or systems change. Several barriers and facilitators to embedding were identified including those related to funding arrangements, organizational and system culture, building trust with communities and the need for training and support for staff. Conclusion Using an implementation science framework, this scoping review has assessed the nature of the evidence base on how to embed community development. While the evidence base uncovered is currently limited, barriers and facilitators to embedding identified in the review can be used to both inform future attempts to embed community development and provide the building blocks for future primary research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Community Development Journal
Community Development Journal DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Since 1966 the leading international journal in its field, covering a wide range of topics, reviewing significant developments and providing a forum for cutting-edge debates about theory and practice. It adopts a broad definition of community development to include policy, planning and action as they impact on the life of communities. We particularly seek to publish critically focused articles which challenge received wisdom, report and discuss innovative practices, and relate issues of community development to questions of social justice, diversity and environmental sustainability.
期刊最新文献
‘We kept having this internal conflict around the language of handout and hand-up’: independent living philosophy and rural disability services during the COVID-19 pandemic Reproducing poverty through participation: examining the constraints of community development strategies in fostering empowerment and social change Implementation of community-based rehabilitation in Colombia in mental health: barriers, facilitators, and purposes The politics of ward committees in enhancing community development through democratic participation in the perspective of structuration Community resilience through bottom–up participation: when civil society drives urban transformation processes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1