旅游经济影响评价

IF 1.5 Q4 GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development Pub Date : 2023-10-15 DOI:10.14246/irspsd.11.4_205
Zeli Hu, Jeetesh Kumar, Suresh Kannam
{"title":"旅游经济影响评价","authors":"Zeli Hu, Jeetesh Kumar, Suresh Kannam","doi":"10.14246/irspsd.11.4_205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The abundance of diverse and varied tourism economic impact studies can be overwhelming for new researchers in this field. The extensive and heterogeneous nature of these studies often creates confusion regarding the specific study topic, the relevant location, and the appropriate assessment models to employ. This paper employs the systematic literature method, co-occurrence network analysis of author keywords, and crosstable analysis to review 70 articles in the Scopus database from 1988 to April 2021. The result shows that tourism economic impact assessment topics can be grouped into tourism demand and factors affecting tourism demand. Locations of studies consist of nations, regions, cities, towns, and communities. Primary assessment models are Input-Output, CGE, TSA, and SAM; the CGE model and SAM have been applied in nations and regions; TSA has been applied to nations. The Input-Output model can be effectively utilised at different levels, including national, regional, and local scales, encompassing countries, regions, and towns. This study offers a comprehensive panorama of study topics, locations, and appropriate measurement models for economic impact assessment, enabling scholars to delve into further research with a clear understanding and direction.","PeriodicalId":44501,"journal":{"name":"International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tourism Economic Impact Assessment\",\"authors\":\"Zeli Hu, Jeetesh Kumar, Suresh Kannam\",\"doi\":\"10.14246/irspsd.11.4_205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The abundance of diverse and varied tourism economic impact studies can be overwhelming for new researchers in this field. The extensive and heterogeneous nature of these studies often creates confusion regarding the specific study topic, the relevant location, and the appropriate assessment models to employ. This paper employs the systematic literature method, co-occurrence network analysis of author keywords, and crosstable analysis to review 70 articles in the Scopus database from 1988 to April 2021. The result shows that tourism economic impact assessment topics can be grouped into tourism demand and factors affecting tourism demand. Locations of studies consist of nations, regions, cities, towns, and communities. Primary assessment models are Input-Output, CGE, TSA, and SAM; the CGE model and SAM have been applied in nations and regions; TSA has been applied to nations. The Input-Output model can be effectively utilised at different levels, including national, regional, and local scales, encompassing countries, regions, and towns. This study offers a comprehensive panorama of study topics, locations, and appropriate measurement models for economic impact assessment, enabling scholars to delve into further research with a clear understanding and direction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14246/irspsd.11.4_205\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14246/irspsd.11.4_205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

丰富多样的旅游经济影响研究对这一领域的新研究人员来说是压倒性的。这些研究的广泛性和异质性常常使人们对具体的研究主题、相关地点和适当的评估模型产生困惑。本文采用系统文献法、作者关键词共现网络分析、交叉稳定分析等方法,对Scopus数据库1988年至2021年4月的70篇文章进行综述。结果表明,旅游经济影响评价主题可分为旅游需求和旅游需求影响因素。研究地点包括国家、地区、城市、城镇和社区。主要评价模型有投入产出、CGE、TSA和SAM;CGE模型和SAM已在多个国家和地区得到应用;TSA已经被应用到国家。投入产出模式可以在国家、区域和地方等不同层面得到有效利用,涵盖国家、地区和城镇。本研究为经济影响评估提供了一个全面的研究主题、研究地点和合适的测量模型,使学者们能够有一个清晰的认识和方向来深入研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tourism Economic Impact Assessment
The abundance of diverse and varied tourism economic impact studies can be overwhelming for new researchers in this field. The extensive and heterogeneous nature of these studies often creates confusion regarding the specific study topic, the relevant location, and the appropriate assessment models to employ. This paper employs the systematic literature method, co-occurrence network analysis of author keywords, and crosstable analysis to review 70 articles in the Scopus database from 1988 to April 2021. The result shows that tourism economic impact assessment topics can be grouped into tourism demand and factors affecting tourism demand. Locations of studies consist of nations, regions, cities, towns, and communities. Primary assessment models are Input-Output, CGE, TSA, and SAM; the CGE model and SAM have been applied in nations and regions; TSA has been applied to nations. The Input-Output model can be effectively utilised at different levels, including national, regional, and local scales, encompassing countries, regions, and towns. This study offers a comprehensive panorama of study topics, locations, and appropriate measurement models for economic impact assessment, enabling scholars to delve into further research with a clear understanding and direction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
43.80%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: For investigation regarding the impact of planning policy on spatial planning implementation, International review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development (IRSPSD International) seeks to learn from researchers in an integrated multidisciplinary platform that reflects a variety of perspectives—such as economic development, social equality, and ecological protection—with a view to achieving a sustainable urban form. This international journal attempts to provide insights into the achievement of a sustainable urban form, through spatial planning and implementation; here, we focus on planning experiences at the levels of local cities and some metropolitan areas in the world, particularly in Asian countries. Submission are expected from multidisciplinary viewpoints encompassing land-use patterns, housing development, transportation, green design, and agricultural and ecological systems.
期刊最新文献
Geospatial Land Use and Land Cover Changes Detection over the Last 40 Years with Validation by Ground Truthing Using an Integrated Approach of Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems in the Amman Zarqa Basin, Jordan Determining Policy Option for Sustainable Residential Area in Suburban Metropolitan Jakarta Rowali model for Sustainable Urban Green Infrastructure Governance Strategies for Acoustical Resilience towards Liveable and Sustainable Urban Neighborhoods The Integration of Region Development Planning in Donggala Regency, Central Sulawesi Province, an Underdeveloped Region in Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1