四十年的运动:安妮·弗兰克的日记和大屠杀否认者,1958-1998

IF 0.5 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY MODERN JUDAISM Pub Date : 2023-10-28 DOI:10.1093/mj/kjad013
Dina Porat
{"title":"四十年的运动:安妮·弗兰克的日记和大屠杀否认者,1958-1998","authors":"Dina Porat","doi":"10.1093/mj/kjad013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract On December 9, 1998, the Dutch court in Amsterdam ruled Anne Frank’s diary to be authentic, and that anyone who cast doubt on its authenticity was breaking the law and would be fined. This article examines the ongoing battle between those who view themselves as charged with the legacy of the diary and the Holocaust deniers; it also examines the methods used by the latter and their possible influence on society. The first half deals with the events leading to the writing of the diary, its publication, theatrical and cinematic adaptations, and examines how the Holocaust deniers came to use those events in their claims. The second half deals with the claims themselves and their development over the years, and the deniers’ attempts to reach the widest possible audience in an attempt to sully the image of one of the central symbols of the Holocaust period, Anne Frank, The Diary of a Young Girl.","PeriodicalId":54089,"journal":{"name":"MODERN JUDAISM","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A FORTY-YEAR-OLD CAMPAIGN: ANNE FRANK’S DIARY AND THE HOLOCAUST DENIERS, 1958–1998\",\"authors\":\"Dina Porat\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/mj/kjad013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract On December 9, 1998, the Dutch court in Amsterdam ruled Anne Frank’s diary to be authentic, and that anyone who cast doubt on its authenticity was breaking the law and would be fined. This article examines the ongoing battle between those who view themselves as charged with the legacy of the diary and the Holocaust deniers; it also examines the methods used by the latter and their possible influence on society. The first half deals with the events leading to the writing of the diary, its publication, theatrical and cinematic adaptations, and examines how the Holocaust deniers came to use those events in their claims. The second half deals with the claims themselves and their development over the years, and the deniers’ attempts to reach the widest possible audience in an attempt to sully the image of one of the central symbols of the Holocaust period, Anne Frank, The Diary of a Young Girl.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MODERN JUDAISM\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MODERN JUDAISM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/mj/kjad013\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MODERN JUDAISM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mj/kjad013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1998年12月9日,荷兰阿姆斯特丹法院裁定安妮·弗兰克的日记是真实的,任何怀疑日记真实性的人都是违法的,将被罚款。这篇文章探讨了那些认为自己负责日记遗产的人与否认大屠杀的人之间正在进行的斗争;它还审查了后者使用的方法及其对社会可能产生的影响。前半部分论述了导致日记写作、出版、戏剧和电影改编的事件,并考察了否认大屠杀的人是如何在他们的主张中使用这些事件的。后半部分涉及这些主张本身及其多年来的发展,以及否认者试图触及尽可能广泛的受众,试图玷污大屠杀时期的核心象征之一安妮·弗兰克的形象,《一个年轻女孩的日记》。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A FORTY-YEAR-OLD CAMPAIGN: ANNE FRANK’S DIARY AND THE HOLOCAUST DENIERS, 1958–1998
Abstract On December 9, 1998, the Dutch court in Amsterdam ruled Anne Frank’s diary to be authentic, and that anyone who cast doubt on its authenticity was breaking the law and would be fined. This article examines the ongoing battle between those who view themselves as charged with the legacy of the diary and the Holocaust deniers; it also examines the methods used by the latter and their possible influence on society. The first half deals with the events leading to the writing of the diary, its publication, theatrical and cinematic adaptations, and examines how the Holocaust deniers came to use those events in their claims. The second half deals with the claims themselves and their development over the years, and the deniers’ attempts to reach the widest possible audience in an attempt to sully the image of one of the central symbols of the Holocaust period, Anne Frank, The Diary of a Young Girl.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
MODERN JUDAISM
MODERN JUDAISM HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Modern Judaism: A Journal of Jewish Ideas and Experience provides a distinctive, interdisciplinary forum for discussion of the modern Jewish experience. Articles focus on topics pertinent to the understanding of Jewish life today and the forces that have shaped that experience.
期刊最新文献
Martin Buber’s Small Theological–Political Tractate The Question to the Single One as a Call for Intersubjective Action An Ambivalent Turn: The Changing Image of the Talmud Among Twentieth-Century German-Jewish Intellectuals Religious-Zionist Right-Wing Israelis: Their Expectations of Archeological Research in Judea and Samaria and Their Ways of Contending With the Resulting Complicated Findings Between Safed and Vienna: Chajim Bloch’s The Memoires of the Kabbalist Vital The Holocaust as An (UN)Exceptional Phenomenon: Development and Change in the Lubavitcher Rebbe’s Outlook
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1