人工智能软件实验中伦理问题的出现

Q3 Social Sciences Reseaux Pub Date : 2023-09-21 DOI:10.3917/res.240.0145
Gérald Gaglio, Alain Loute
{"title":"人工智能软件实验中伦理问题的出现","authors":"Gérald Gaglio, Alain Loute","doi":"10.3917/res.240.0145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article brings together the perspectives of the sociology of innovation and the ethics of technology. It highlights the heuristic scope of the concept of experimentation for reflection on the ethics of Artificial Intelligence (AI), in the field of radiology. More specifically, we mobilize three types of experimentation (experiments in and with technology, and tacit experiments) to describe and analyse four work environments where AI-based detection software is tested in senology and traumatology. We highlight the ways in which these devices are appropriated (or rejected), as well as the resulting ethical concerns, drawing on the above-mentioned derivatives of the concept of experimentation. AI ethics raises three sets of questions: the first concerns the steering, scope and learning process of these experiments, and ultimately their (more or less) democratic nature; the second concerns the accuracy of what the software delivers, and consequently the risks of error involved, in a context where analytical work is delegated (at least partially) to algorithms; and the third concerns the quality of the service provided and its fairness, within the healthcare system, as well as the content of professional identities. AI ethics are thus embedded in concrete situations of use and embodied in professional worlds, unlike ‘principled’ and ‘future’ ethics.","PeriodicalId":35245,"journal":{"name":"Reseaux","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"L’émergence d’enjeux éthiques lors d’expérimentations de logiciels d’intelligence artificielle\",\"authors\":\"Gérald Gaglio, Alain Loute\",\"doi\":\"10.3917/res.240.0145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article brings together the perspectives of the sociology of innovation and the ethics of technology. It highlights the heuristic scope of the concept of experimentation for reflection on the ethics of Artificial Intelligence (AI), in the field of radiology. More specifically, we mobilize three types of experimentation (experiments in and with technology, and tacit experiments) to describe and analyse four work environments where AI-based detection software is tested in senology and traumatology. We highlight the ways in which these devices are appropriated (or rejected), as well as the resulting ethical concerns, drawing on the above-mentioned derivatives of the concept of experimentation. AI ethics raises three sets of questions: the first concerns the steering, scope and learning process of these experiments, and ultimately their (more or less) democratic nature; the second concerns the accuracy of what the software delivers, and consequently the risks of error involved, in a context where analytical work is delegated (at least partially) to algorithms; and the third concerns the quality of the service provided and its fairness, within the healthcare system, as well as the content of professional identities. AI ethics are thus embedded in concrete situations of use and embodied in professional worlds, unlike ‘principled’ and ‘future’ ethics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35245,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reseaux\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reseaux\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3917/res.240.0145\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reseaux","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/res.240.0145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文汇集了创新社会学和技术伦理学的观点。它突出了在放射学领域对人工智能(AI)伦理反思的实验概念的启发式范围。更具体地说,我们动员了三种类型的实验(技术实验和隐性实验)来描述和分析四种工作环境,在这些环境中,基于人工智能的检测软件在老年学和创伤学中进行了测试。我们强调这些设备被挪用(或拒绝)的方式,以及由此产生的伦理问题,借鉴上述实验概念的衍生品。人工智能伦理提出了三组问题:第一个问题涉及这些实验的指导、范围和学习过程,以及最终它们(或多或少)的民主性质;第二个问题涉及软件交付的准确性,以及在将分析工作(至少部分地)委托给算法的环境中所涉及的错误风险;第三是医疗保健系统内所提供服务的质量和公平性,以及职业身份的内容。因此,人工智能伦理嵌入到具体的使用情境中,并体现在专业领域中,而不像’原则’和& # 8216;未来# 8217;道德。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
L’émergence d’enjeux éthiques lors d’expérimentations de logiciels d’intelligence artificielle
This article brings together the perspectives of the sociology of innovation and the ethics of technology. It highlights the heuristic scope of the concept of experimentation for reflection on the ethics of Artificial Intelligence (AI), in the field of radiology. More specifically, we mobilize three types of experimentation (experiments in and with technology, and tacit experiments) to describe and analyse four work environments where AI-based detection software is tested in senology and traumatology. We highlight the ways in which these devices are appropriated (or rejected), as well as the resulting ethical concerns, drawing on the above-mentioned derivatives of the concept of experimentation. AI ethics raises three sets of questions: the first concerns the steering, scope and learning process of these experiments, and ultimately their (more or less) democratic nature; the second concerns the accuracy of what the software delivers, and consequently the risks of error involved, in a context where analytical work is delegated (at least partially) to algorithms; and the third concerns the quality of the service provided and its fairness, within the healthcare system, as well as the content of professional identities. AI ethics are thus embedded in concrete situations of use and embodied in professional worlds, unlike ‘principled’ and ‘future’ ethics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reseaux
Reseaux Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: La revue Réseaux – Communication – Technologie – Société s"intéresse à l"ensemble du champ de la communication en s"axant tout particulièrement sur les télécommunications. Les mass-médias et l"informatique sont également abordés. La télévision a notamment constitué le thème d"un nombre important de numéros. La réflexion sur la communication étant à l"origine de nombreux débats au sein des sciences sociales, des numéros sont aussi consacrés à des questions d"ordre théorique ou méthodologique.
期刊最新文献
La fabrique discursive de la haine Maddalena CANNITO, Eugenia MERCURI et Francesca TOMATIS, Cancel culture e ideologia gender. Fenomenologia di un dibattito pubblico, Turin, Rosenberg & Seillier, coll. « Questioni di genere », 2022, 104 p. Jérôme DENIS, David PONTILLE, Le soin des choses : politiques de la maintenance , Paris, La Découverte, coll. « Terrains philosophiques », 2022, 368 p. Chris BAIL, Breaking the Social Media Prism: How to Make Our Platforms Less Polarizing , Princeton, N.J., Princeton University Press, 2021, 240 p. Quelle place pour les réseaux sociaux numériques dans la production et la circulation des discours de haine ?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1