卫生公平与司法:从罗尔斯的视角看巴西的统一卫生制度

IF 0.4 4区 哲学 Acta Bioethica Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.4067/s1726-569x2023000200165
Luiz Oscar Machado Martins, Marcio Fernandes dos Reis, Alfredo Chaoubah, Guilhermina Rego
{"title":"卫生公平与司法:从罗尔斯的视角看巴西的统一卫生制度","authors":"Luiz Oscar Machado Martins, Marcio Fernandes dos Reis, Alfredo Chaoubah, Guilhermina Rego","doi":"10.4067/s1726-569x2023000200165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study addresses the issue of equity in health and justice from the perspective of public health bioethics, describing the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS), equating legitimate interests for essential goods, such as health. The conception of John Rawls’ theory of justice is “justice as fairness” and has a seventeenth century contractualism tenor. Although it was not conceived specifically for health and marked by the “difference principle”, it promoted, in the field of health care, the institution of health systems created on the basis of universal access and equity in the distribution of scarce resources. The principles of the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) guarantee access to all levels of care, equality in health care, without distinctions or privileges of any kind, integrity in health care, free of charge, community participation and decentralization, regionalization and hierarchization of health actions and services, which gives the SUS a strong Rawlsian bias. The Brazilian model was built on the principle that health is a right of all and a duty of the State, therefore, it is based on the assumption of universal and equal access to health actions and services for its promotion and recovery.","PeriodicalId":49112,"journal":{"name":"Acta Bioethica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Equity in health and justice: a look at the Brazilian unified health system (SUS) from the perspective of John Rawls\",\"authors\":\"Luiz Oscar Machado Martins, Marcio Fernandes dos Reis, Alfredo Chaoubah, Guilhermina Rego\",\"doi\":\"10.4067/s1726-569x2023000200165\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study addresses the issue of equity in health and justice from the perspective of public health bioethics, describing the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS), equating legitimate interests for essential goods, such as health. The conception of John Rawls’ theory of justice is “justice as fairness” and has a seventeenth century contractualism tenor. Although it was not conceived specifically for health and marked by the “difference principle”, it promoted, in the field of health care, the institution of health systems created on the basis of universal access and equity in the distribution of scarce resources. The principles of the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) guarantee access to all levels of care, equality in health care, without distinctions or privileges of any kind, integrity in health care, free of charge, community participation and decentralization, regionalization and hierarchization of health actions and services, which gives the SUS a strong Rawlsian bias. The Brazilian model was built on the principle that health is a right of all and a duty of the State, therefore, it is based on the assumption of universal and equal access to health actions and services for its promotion and recovery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Bioethica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Bioethica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4067/s1726-569x2023000200165\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Bioethica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s1726-569x2023000200165","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究从公共卫生生物伦理学的角度解决了卫生公平和正义问题,描述了巴西统一卫生系统(SUS),将健康等基本商品的合法利益等同起来。约翰·罗尔斯的正义理论的概念是“正义即公平”,具有17世纪契约主义的基调。虽然它不是专门为保健而构想的,并以“差别原则”为标志,但它在保健领域促进了在普遍获得和公平分配稀缺资源的基础上建立的保健制度。巴西统一卫生系统(SUS)的原则保证获得所有级别的保健,平等的卫生保健,没有任何形式的区别或特权,卫生保健的完整性,免费,社区参与和权力下放,卫生行动和服务的区区化和分层,这使SUS具有强烈的罗尔斯偏见。巴西模式是根据健康是所有人的权利和国家的义务这一原则建立的,因此,它的基础是普遍和平等地获得促进和恢复健康的保健行动和服务的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Equity in health and justice: a look at the Brazilian unified health system (SUS) from the perspective of John Rawls
This study addresses the issue of equity in health and justice from the perspective of public health bioethics, describing the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS), equating legitimate interests for essential goods, such as health. The conception of John Rawls’ theory of justice is “justice as fairness” and has a seventeenth century contractualism tenor. Although it was not conceived specifically for health and marked by the “difference principle”, it promoted, in the field of health care, the institution of health systems created on the basis of universal access and equity in the distribution of scarce resources. The principles of the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) guarantee access to all levels of care, equality in health care, without distinctions or privileges of any kind, integrity in health care, free of charge, community participation and decentralization, regionalization and hierarchization of health actions and services, which gives the SUS a strong Rawlsian bias. The Brazilian model was built on the principle that health is a right of all and a duty of the State, therefore, it is based on the assumption of universal and equal access to health actions and services for its promotion and recovery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Bioethica
Acta Bioethica 医学-卫生政策
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Acta Bioethica is a biannual publication by the Interdisciplinary Center for Studies in Bioethics of the University of Chile (ISSN 0717-5906, press edition, y 1726-569-X, electronic edition), which publishes in three languages: Spanish, English and Portuguese. Indexed in Science Citation Index (SCI), Scopus, Lilacs, SciELO y Latindex, and in database from several Institutions; it constitutes a pluralistic source of perspectives and an important tribune which accepts the contributions of authors compromised with the interdisciplinary study of ethical determinants and consequences of techno scientific research.
期刊最新文献
The application of bioethics as legal basis in judicial sentences concerning right to health in Brazil Injusticias epistémicas normalizadas y restricción de la agencia de las personas con discapacidad El futuro antropológico de la medicina The Centre for Medical Humanities and Bioethics, Linköping University. The importance of encounters between the medical humanities and bioethics Study on the policy implementation effect of serious Illness medical insurance in the ethnic minority autonomous area of Western China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1